I have following 2 doubts. please help me resolve them
Exception to TOUCH rule (doesn't following statements contradict eachother)
MGMAT SC 4th ed. (pg-234): short predicate can separate noun & noun-modifier.
Ron's video(https://vimeo.com/11867667 at 1:38hrs): says following sentence is wrong because you cannot separate noun & noun modifier "I know more about Shakespear than my brother does, who has not studies british lecture."
Another doubt from same video at 1:38hrs:
a) I know more about Shakespear than does my brother
b) I know more about Shakespear than knows my brother
Ron says- a) is correct because we can put helping verb before subject but b) is wrong because we cannot put action verb before subject. However, we know that, in above context, "does" stands for "knows" OR "does==knows" then why there is difference in usage
doubts in parallelism
This topic has expert replies
- vikram4689
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1325
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
- Thanked: 105 times
- Followed by:14 members
- avik.ch
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
- Thanked: 149 times
- Followed by:32 members
- GMAT Score:760
I know more about Shakespeare than my brother does, who has not studies british lecture - where is the predicate here ?vikram4689 wrote:Exception to TOUCH rule (doesn't following statements contradict eachother)
MGMAT SC 4th ed. (pg-234): short predicate can separate noun & noun-modifier.
Ron's video(https://vimeo.com/11867667 at 1:38hrs): says following sentence is wrong because you cannot separate noun & noun modifier "I know more about Shakespear than my brother does, who has not studies british lecture."
If you go with the exact conversational definition of predicate : subject + predicate ( includes all that define or tell us more about the subject ), then you will realize that the whole concept of noun + noun modifier will not hold with the above mentioned rule. So the concept you are referring above do not consider this definition of predicate.
1.the attributes of a verb is determined by what follows the verb and not what comes before it ( in all active sentence).vikram4689 wrote:Another doubt from same video at 1:38hrs:
a) I know more about Shakespear than does my brother
b) I know more about Shakespear than knows my brother
Ron says- a) is correct because we can put helping verb before subject but b) is wrong because we cannot put action verb before subject. However, we know that, in above context, "does" stands for "knows" OR "does==knows" then why there is difference in usage
2. "does" do not stand for "knows". when ever we use any action verb - we assume did/do. repeating "does" only help us to assume the action verb to follow.
In the above example :
1. I know more about Shakespeare than does my brother [know]
I know more about Shakespeare than my brother does [know]
In both these cases,"know",the main action verb, is assumed.
2. I know more about Shakespeare than knows my brother - here, "knows" being the original action verb ( the point of comparison) makes "my brother" the object of the verb. so this version would be correct -
I know more about Shakespeare than my brother knows.
hope this helps !!
- vikram4689
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1325
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
- Thanked: 105 times
- Followed by:14 members
I know more about Shakespeare than my brother does, who has not studies british lecture - where is the predicate here ?
She dances. - verb-only predicate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predicate_(grammar)
"brother does" is clause and "does" is predicate. in case you don't like "does" in above sentence consider this sentence from mgmat sc A new CEO has been hired who will transform the company. as per the ron's suggestion this sentence will be incorrect as well. i think that this rule is revised recently but will have to confirm from ron.
if we can use "do" then we can use "does" as well. they are singular-plural versions."does" do not stand for "knows". when ever we use any action verb - we assume did/do. repeating "does" only help us to assume the action verb to follow.
I know more about Shakespeare than does my brother [know]
I know more about Shakespeare than my brother does [know]
in any case, above sentences are not correct please see https://www.beatthegmat.com/halleya-s-co ... tml#468096
this is incorrect because as per above quote gift is object but infact it is subject - in the presentation ceremony hall is your gift.I know more about Shakespeare than knows my brother - here, "knows" being the original action verb ( the point of comparison) makes "my brother" the object of the verb.
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/wink.png)
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/wink.png)
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
you can't put a verb between a noun and "which".vikram4689 wrote:I have following 2 doubts. please help me resolve them
Exception to TOUCH rule (doesn't following statements contradict eachother)
MGMAT SC 4th ed. (pg-234): short predicate can separate noun & noun-modifier.
Ron's video(https://vimeo.com/11867667 at 1:38hrs): says following sentence is wrong because you cannot separate noun & noun modifier "I know more about Shakespear than my brother does, who has not studies british lecture."
there are some modifiers that will allow an intervening verb, but "which" is not one of them.
yeah, but that doesn't change the thing that matters: one of those is a helping verb, and the other isn't.Ron says- a) is correct because we can put helping verb before subject but b) is wrong because we cannot put action verb before subject. However, we know that, in above context, "does" stands for "knows" OR "does==knows" then why there is difference in usage
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron