BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

divisibility

Expert replies
by mehrasa » Mon Sep 26, 2011 12:10 am
is x divisible by 8?

1)x is divisible by 24
2)x is divisible by 16


[spoiler]OA: A[/spoiler]
my Q is that how we can prove B is not sufficient
bcuz 16 have four (2) while for divisibility of 8 we need three (2).. why we can not determine that x is divisible by 8.. can sum1 explain for me theoretically...
Last edited by mehrasa on Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by shankar.ashwin » Mon Sep 26, 2011 12:59 am
What? 48 is ofcourse divisible by 8.

Should be D IMO


mehrasa wrote:is x divisible by 8?

1)x is divisible by 24
2)x is divisible by 16


[spoiler]OA: A[/spoiler]
my Q is that how we can prove B is not sufficient
bcuz 16 have four (2) while for divisibility of 8 we need three (2).. why we can not determine that x is divisible by 8.. can sum1 explain for me theoretically...
i know its example is 48 which is divisible by 16 but not 8
Join the discussion

by mehrasa » Mon Sep 26, 2011 1:49 am
to me also the answer is D bcuz as i said 16 have four (2) and 8 needs three (2)... I taught maybe I,m wrong

shankar.ashwin wrote:What? 48 is ofcourse divisible by 8.

Should be D IMO


mehrasa wrote:is x divisible by 8?

1)x is divisible by 24
2)x is divisible by 16


[spoiler]OA: A[/spoiler]
my Q is that how we can prove B is not sufficient
bcuz 16 have four (2) while for divisibility of 8 we need three (2).. why we can not determine that x is divisible by 8.. can sum1 explain for me theoretically...
i know its example is 48 which is divisible by 16 but not 8
Join the discussion

by mehrasa » Mon Sep 26, 2011 1:50 am
to me also the answer is D bcuz as i said 16 have four (2) and 8 needs three (2)... I taught maybe I,m wrong

shankar.ashwin wrote:What? 48 is ofcourse divisible by 8.

Should be D IMO


mehrasa wrote:is x divisible by 8?

1)x is divisible by 24
2)x is divisible by 16


[spoiler]OA: A[/spoiler]
my Q is that how we can prove B is not sufficient
bcuz 16 have four (2) while for divisibility of 8 we need three (2).. why we can not determine that x is divisible by 8.. can sum1 explain for me theoretically...
i know its example is 48 which is divisible by 16 but not 8
Join the discussion

by shankar.ashwin » Mon Sep 26, 2011 1:56 am
Having greater Nos. of 2's is Okay, only when you have lesser No's of 2's the number would not be divisible..

IF the question was;

Is x divisible by 16?

A) X is divisible by 8
B) X is divisible by 32

In this case it would be B (Because A has lesser Nos of 2's)
mehrasa wrote:to me also the answer is D bcuz as i said 16 have four (2) and 8 needs three (2)... I taught maybe I,m wrong
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:00 am
mehrasa wrote:is x divisible by 8?
1)x is divisible by 24
2)x is divisible by 16
[spoiler]OA: A[/spoiler]
A lot of integer property questions can be solved using prime factorization.
For divisibility questions, we can say:
If N is divisible by k, then k is "hiding" within the prime factorization of N
Examples:
24 is divisible by 3 <--> 24 = 2x2x2x3
70 is divisible by 5 <--> 70 = 2x5x7
330 is divisible by 6 <--> 330 = 2x3x5x11

So, if x is divisible by 8, then we know an 8 is hiding in the prime factorization of x.
In other words x = (2)(2)(2)(?)(?)... [notice that we may or may not have primes other than the three 2's in the factorization. All we can be certain of is that there are three 2's (8) within the prime factorization]

Okay, with all of that, we can first take the target question "Is x divisible by 8?" and reword it as "Is 8 hiding in the prime factorization of x"

Statement 1: x is divisible by 24
In other words, 24 is hiding in the prime factorization of x
So, we can say that x = (2)(2)(2)(3)(?)(?)...
From here we can see that 8 is hiding in the prime factorization of x (in the form of three 2's)
So, statement 1 is sufficient.

Statement 1: x is divisible by 16
In other words, 16 is hiding in the prime factorization of x
So, we can say that x = (2)(2)(2)(2)(?)(?)...
From here we can see that 8 is hiding in the prime factorization of x (in the form of three 2's)
So, statement 2 is sufficient, and the answer is D

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion