Despite the recent election of a woman to the office of prime minister, the status of women in Pakistan is little changed from how it was in the last century.
(A) is little changed from how it was
(B) is a little change from how it was
(C) has changed little
(D) has changed little from how it has been
(E) is little changed from the way it was
While the popular opinion about this question is C, I am finding C illogical.
Firstly it talks about something that has the effect until now and then compares it to a state of the past.C would have made full sense, had the last words been in the present century.
Secondly, it distorts the meaning of the original sentence. The sentence is trying to compare the status of women in this century to the status of women in the last century.
C totally eats up this comparison and says somethign else.
How can this possible be the correct choice then.
D, on the other hand, keeps the meaning intact and conveys the right message.
Can someone clarify this issue heere.
Despite the recent election of a woman
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:14 am
- Location: Bangalore
- Thanked: 20 times
- Followed by:5 members
- GMAT Score:770
I think option C should ideally be "has changed little from how it was".
D is not definitely not right. You should probably not rack your brains
about this question.
HTH
D is not definitely not right. You should probably not rack your brains
about this question.
HTH
- karthikgmat
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:35 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:610
I think "Changed" itself signifies the comparison of current century to last. So, C is concise and correct.
- jimmyjimmy
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:08 pm
- Thanked: 8 times
D is wrong, has changed little from how it has been in the last centurydhonu121 wrote:Despite the recent election of a woman to the office of prime minister, the status of women in Pakistan is little changed from how it was in the last century.
(A) is little changed from how it was
(B) is a little change from how it was
(C) has changed little
(D) has changed little from how it has been
(E) is little changed from the way it was
While the popular opinion about this question is C, I am finding C illogical.
Firstly it talks about something that has the effect until now and then compares it to a state of the past.C would have made full sense, had the last words been in the present century.
Secondly, it distorts the meaning of the original sentence. The sentence is trying to compare the status of women in this century to the status of women in the last century.
C totally eats up this comparison and says somethign else.
How can this possible be the correct choice then.
D, on the other hand, keeps the meaning intact and conveys the right message.
Can someone clarify this issue heere.
instead of has, had shud come..coz its talking about last centure, past tense, correct me if m wrong..
- vk_vinayak
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pm
- Thanked: 99 times
- Followed by:21 members
Agree with karthikgmat's explanation. Indeed, his explanation is also concise and correct. D is wrong for the second 'has'.
- VK
I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:14 am
- Location: Bangalore
- Thanked: 20 times
- Followed by:5 members
- GMAT Score:770
Given the 5 choices in the exam, I will pick C. Having said that,
C changes the meaning of the sentence (as per me), and I can not
agree with Karthik's explanation. If we are talking about last
century and current century, last century is past and hence the
construction, I feel, is wrong. "status of women changed little
in last century" is what I would use to indicate a past.
HTH
C changes the meaning of the sentence (as per me), and I can not
agree with Karthik's explanation. If we are talking about last
century and current century, last century is past and hence the
construction, I feel, is wrong. "status of women changed little
in last century" is what I would use to indicate a past.
HTH
vk_vinayak wrote:Agree with karthikgmat's explanation. Indeed, his explanation is also concise and correct. D is wrong for the second 'has'.
- karthikgmat
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:35 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:610
The meaning here "change of status of women in previous century to current century" . Isn't it?
If its so Changed should itself convey the meaning .
Alter from value X to value Y -> changed little .(in this case)
If its so Changed should itself convey the meaning .
Alter from value X to value Y -> changed little .(in this case)
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 5:18 am
- Location: Mumbai
IMHO, A is wordy.
Option C clearly conveys the meaning clearly and concisely.
Option D however distorts the original meaning of sentence and creates ambiguity.
Here sentence requires present perfect tense indicating process started somewhere in past and still continues.
Option C clearly conveys the meaning clearly and concisely.
Option D however distorts the original meaning of sentence and creates ambiguity.
Here sentence requires present perfect tense indicating process started somewhere in past and still continues.