crack this !!
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 3:20 am
Let I be false. Then no home sold for more than 165,000.rahuljones1 wrote:Crack this one
15 x 150000 = 2250000 =Total value of all homes.
If median is 130,000, the first seven homes will have 130,000 since I must max to cover more ground and since first 7 can’t sell for greater since 130000.
So H1-H7 sold for 130000, H8 is median, 130,000. Total is 130000 x8=1,040,000. Subtract this from 2,2500000=1,210,000.
If the remaining 7 houses each sell for 165000 then, 7 x1650000=1155000<1210000. So I must be True.
H1-H7 – 130,000
H8---- 130,000
H9-H14 165,000
H15 ---220,000>165,000
Use this distribution to answer the rest of the question.
II must be true. Since 165,000>130,000 <150,000
III is false b/c none of the homes in the distribution above sold for less than 130,000
Choose I and II
But this doesn't disprove what I wrote.avenus wrote:Not quite. An example:II must be true. Since 165,000>130,000 <150,000
H1,H2,...,H8 = 130K
H9, H10,..., H14 = 170K
H15 = 190K
170K>130K<150K<190K.
At least one is greater than 130K. and one at least one is less than $150K. Isnt' 130K<150K?
yeah, I guess 130K is usually <150K but statement II goes "At least one of the homes was sold for more than 130K and less than 150K". It's referring to the same home.dtweah wrote:But this doesn't disprove what I wrote.avenus wrote:Not quite. An example:II must be true. Since 165,000>130,000 <150,000
H1,H2,...,H8 = 130K
H9, H10,..., H14 = 170K
H15 = 190K
170K>130K<150K<190K.
At least one is greater than 130K. and one at least one is less than $150K. Isnt' 130K<150K?
It doesn't say "At least one of the homes was sold for more than 130K and one of the homes was sold for less than 150K"
I stick with (A), I only.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 3:20 am
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:29 pm
- Location: new jersey
- GMAT Score:640
I stick with A only too.
Because statement 2 says that "At least one of the homes was sold for more than 130K and less than 150K” so in this case, let’s say that all the first 8 houses were sold for 130K, which leaves 1,210,000 if you divide this by 7 (the remaining homes) you will get 172K. So you see, one of the rest of the houses don’t necessarily have to be between 130k & 150k. It could be, but doesn’t have to be. A is correct.
Because statement 2 says that "At least one of the homes was sold for more than 130K and less than 150K” so in this case, let’s say that all the first 8 houses were sold for 130K, which leaves 1,210,000 if you divide this by 7 (the remaining homes) you will get 172K. So you see, one of the rest of the houses don’t necessarily have to be between 130k & 150k. It could be, but doesn’t have to be. A is correct.