BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR- help required

Expert replies
by joinashish » Mon May 09, 2011 11:45 pm
Source: Friend

A recent study has concluded that, contrary to the claim of those trying to ban cigarette advertisements altogether, cigarette ads placed on bill boards and in magazines have little to no effect on the smoking habits of the smokers who views the ads. The study, which surveyed more than 20,000 smokers and solicited their reasons for continuing to smoke, found that practically no one in the survey felt that these advertisements influenced their decision to smoke.

The study's conclusion is based upon which of the following assumptions?

a) people do not switch cigarette brands based on their exposure to cigarette ads on bill boards and in magazines.

b) Cigarette ads on bill boards and in magazines do not encourage non smokers to take up the habit.

c) Banning cigarette ads altogether will encourage people to give up smoking

d) people are consciously aware of all reasons they choose to smoke

e) People who decide to smoke do so for rational reasons.

OA is D....

My doubt: In assumption question we can go for external details, in this argument study was based on the smokers reaction with cigarette ads placed on billboards and magazines. This argument failed to include non smokers reaction to the ads.

So as in option B we may assume that these ads do not encourage non smokers to take up the habit.( Assumption Q)

But in option D, it can be inferred that smokers are aware of the reasons of their smoking.( inference Q)

So, why option D but not B is correct.
Last edited by joinashish on Tue May 10, 2011 12:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by atulmangal » Tue May 10, 2011 12:18 am
first of all, is it an official question...why m asking this is because of SC section now i have this habit to raise question if i find something awful in structure. So far i have seen that official question, even of CR are well written. Sorry, before doing CR drill m doing an SC drill here, please suggest me if m missing something. In the given argument, the part in RED COLOR is referring to what??? if its a verb, what is it subject and if its a modifier, to what it is modifying????
A recent study has concluded that, contrary to the claim of those trying to ban cigarette advertisements altogether, cigarette ads placed on bill boards and in magazines have little to no effect on the smoking habits of the smokers and solicited their reasons for continuing to smoke, found that practically no one in the survey felt that these advertisements influenced their decision to smoke.
I believe, after SMOKE (green color) a full stop must be there. As thats where the conclusion ends. After that the sentence should start again, with researchers found or studies found etc...

I'm sorry, when i was reading this argument structure i feel something incomplete, if m missing something please clear...

And by the way OA should be Op D only..will explain this later if needed but first m looking for the answer of my question.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by joinashish » Tue May 10, 2011 12:59 am
Thanks to respond. You are absolutely correct, it was my mistake( typing error). I modified the stimulus. But still wondering for the answer.
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Tue May 10, 2011 1:36 am
joinashish wrote:Thanks to respond. You are absolutely correct, it was my mistake( typing error). I modified the stimulus. But still wondering for the answer.
Op B is Out of scope (a common term in CR)

In assumption question you can include extra piece of info, but u include that info to support the conclusion / supporting premise but not to change the scope of the argument. The scope of the argument is restricted to SMOKERS only, that means the scope is restricted and set, and in any case u can not go beyond this scope. This applies for all the types of questions in CR section (as per my knowledge).

Why Op D is correct..??

See the author's conclusion is based on the supporting premise:

more than 20,000 smokers and solicited their reasons for continuing to smoke, found that practically no one in the survey felt that these advertisements influenced their decision to smoke.

Observe the part in bold, this suggests that people have this sense or they know which particular thing influence their decision to smoke...right..

Imagine if people doesn't have this sense and then if they say, we don't fell advertisement facilitates us to smoke...isn't that gonna be meaningless...without such sense how can they can say this, and in that case this whole supporting premise will fall and thus as the supporting premise fall, so does the conclusion.

So, we can say that, the assumption made in Op D is necessary for the validity of conclusion.
Join the discussion

by joinashish » Tue May 10, 2011 1:59 am
thanks to explain...i will keep it in mind while practicing other questions and will keep posting if any doubt will incur...

thanks again
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Tue May 10, 2011 2:14 am
joinashish wrote:thanks to explain...i will keep it in mind while practicing other questions and will keep posting if any doubt will incur...

thanks again
I'm glad my post helped....keep posting
Join the discussion

by LIL » Tue May 10, 2011 4:17 am
ok, that original post was all over the place, but i assume you are asking why (d) is correct, and why (b) is incorrect?

(b) is incorrect because the study cited is about the smoking habits of smokers. thus, the smoking habits (or non-smoking habits) of non-smokers is obviously not an assumption the study was based upon. we're not concerned with non-smokers in a study about smokers.

(d) is correct because the study asked smokers if they *felt* like they were influenced by ads. to draw a conclusion from this type of study, you must assume that the smokers know what they are talking about, i.e., they know for sure that they are not influenced by ads.

most self-reported studies' conclusions are called into question for this very reason--you have to assume the people self reporting know what they're talking about and are telling the truth.
Join the discussion