Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

confusing SC!!!

Expert replies

by GMATGuruNY » Fri May 12, 2017 3:53 am
ngk4mba3236 wrote:won't it be better if it were : proposed a return to communal ownership of land, what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership... ? ("to" is dropped here to make the TWO NOUNS in APPOSITION appear exactly side-by-side)

your thoughts please!
If we omit the second to in the OA, we get:
a return to communal ownership of land, what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership.
Here, the portion in red seems to be in apposition to the noun in blue, conveying that LAND = what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership.
Not the intended meaning.

Actual OA:
a return to communal ownership of land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.
Here, each colored portion serves as an object of the preposition to.
Since the two colored portions serve the same function, it is crystal clear that the red portion is in apposition to the entire blue portion, conveying that COMMUNAL OWNERSHIP OF LAND = what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership.

An analogous structure appears in SC67 in the OG16:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/can-two-inde ... 83697.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by ngk4mba3236 » Fri May 12, 2017 5:32 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:If we omit the second to in the OA, we get:
a return to communal ownership of land, what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership.
Here, the portion in red seems to be in apposition to the noun in blue, conveying that LAND = what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership.
Not the intended meaning.
in this case, how we can consider the first NOUN to be only "land" instead of the whole NOUN-phrase "COMMUNAL OWNERSHIP OF LAND" ?

two NOUN-phrases can be in APPOSITION, right ?
GMATGuruNY wrote:Actual OA:
a return to communal ownership of land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.
Here, each colored portion serves as an object of the preposition to.
Since the two colored portions serve the same function, it is crystal clear that the red portion is in apposition to the entire blue portion, conveying that COMMUNAL OWNERSHIP OF LAND = what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership.
got this part.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue May 16, 2017 5:12 am
ngk4mba3236 wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:If we omit the second to in the OA, we get:
a return to communal ownership of land, what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership.
Here, the portion in red seems to be in apposition to the noun in blue, conveying that LAND = what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership.
Not the intended meaning.
in this case, how we can consider the first NOUN to be only "land" instead of the whole NOUN-phrase "COMMUNAL OWNERSHIP OF LAND" ?

two NOUN-phrases can be in APPOSITION, right ?
The default referent for COMMA + APPOSITIVE is the nearest preceding noun.
Thus, the default referent for the red appositive above is the nearest preceding noun in blue.
If COMMA + APPOSITIVE is intended to refer to an earlier noun, some aspect of the sentence will make the intention crystal clear.
An OA from GMAC:
The recent birth of a Sumatran rhinoceros in a Cincinnati zoo, the first birth in captivity for that species in over a century, is a landmark development.
Here, the parallel forms in blue make it crystal clear that the first birth serves to refer not to zoo (the nearest preceding noun) but to the recent birth (an earlier noun phrase).
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by ngk4mba3236 » Wed May 17, 2017 9:51 pm
so, the default referent for the appositive (NOUN or NOUN-phrase) will generally be the nearest preceding noun (but NOT the nearest preceding NOUN-phrase).

did I get you right ?
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu May 18, 2017 3:02 am
ngk4mba3236 wrote:so, the default referent for the appositive (NOUN or NOUN-phrase) will generally be the nearest preceding noun (but NOT the nearest preceding NOUN-phrase).

did I get you right ?
Correct.
But as noted in my post above, COMMA + APPOSITIVE may serve to refer to an earlier noun if some aspect of the sentence makes the intention crystal clear.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion