Chairs, Intergers

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:02 pm
Followed by:1 members

Chairs, Intergers

by qduong » Thu Jun 16, 2011 8:22 pm
Please help explain. Thank you.
Attachments
DS 7.jpg
DS 8.jpg

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 9:09 am
Location: pune
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:3 members

by amit2k9 » Thu Jun 16, 2011 8:52 pm
1. a let individual chairs cost $n and bunch of 6 chairs = $m

n= 0.9* 6m = 0.54m not sufficient.

b n = 5m+20 not sufficient.

a+b 5m+20 = 0.54m thus m = 0.04m = 20. Sufficient. thus C.

2

a can be (1,1) or (-1,-2,-3) not sufficient.

b can be (1,1) or (-1,1) not sufficient.

a+b

numbers cannot be (-1,1) or (-2,-1,1,2) meaning having both positive and negative integers.
numbers have to be either (-1,-2) or (1,2) and so on. meaning either completely positive or completely negative.

sufficient.

hence C.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 28 times
GMAT Score:770

by goalevan » Sun Jun 19, 2011 8:12 pm
First problem:
Set G: price of a set of 6 chairs, S: price of a single chair

Question stem asks, in other words, what is the value of G?

1) G = 90% * 6S.
We are not given S or G, so this equation cannot be solved. Insufficient.

2) G = 5S + 20.
We are not given S or G, so this equation cannot be solved. Insufficient.

1 & 2) We immediately see that we can substitute for G to create an equation with one unknown. Carrying out the operations just for illustration we see:
5S + 20 = 90% * 6S
20 = 0.4S
S = 20(5/2) = 50. Sufficient.

IMO C

Second problem:
The question stem asks whether the product of all integers in the list is positive. In other words, is the count of negative numbers in this list even?

1) This statement says that the smallest and greatest integers are the same sign, ie all integers in the list are positive or all are negative. But we could have {-5,-4,-3}, which yields a negative product, but {1,2,3,4,5}, which yields a positive one. Insufficient.

2) We could have {-2,-1,1,2}, which yields a positive number, or {-1,1,2,3} which yields negative. Insufficient.

1 & 2) Taking both statements, the list can be:
a) all negative numbers which can then be factored into the list (-1)^(k)*{a,b,c,d,...} where k is an even integer making the product positive.
b) all positive numbers, whose product will always equal a positive number. Sufficient.

IMO C

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 9:32 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by treker » Tue Jun 21, 2011 5:25 am
In the second question,
Can someone explain as to how we could deduce(from 1 and 2) that all elements in the list are either positive or negative?

Thanks.
Thanks!
- Treker

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:13 members
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Tue Jun 21, 2011 7:06 am
For DS7 it shall be E

we need even number of equal signed numbers..
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 28 times
GMAT Score:770

by goalevan » Tue Jun 21, 2011 7:35 pm
Hi treker,

The first statement in the second problem says "the product of the greatest and smallest integers in the list is positive." Algebraically, this is stated as xy > 0. By the way, I recommend memorizing this inequality as "x and y are the same sign" whenever you see it written this way, as this is quite popular in the GMAT I've noticed.

We can deduce that all numbers are either negative or positive because they all fall between the largest and the smallest number, which are both the same sign.

I hope this addresses your question.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:06 pm

by yjeezle » Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:02 pm
DS8: Let Set = S, individual = I

[spoiler]A) S= 5.4I; S = .9 x 6I; neither I or S are given
B) S= 5I + 20; same as above (2 variables in eqn)
C) 5.4I = 5I + 20; equate the two together
D) invalid[/spoiler]


shouldn't DS7 be E?

1) product of low & high can be these combinations: neg/pos, neg/neg, pos/pos; insuff
2) even number of integers: neg neg pos pos; neg pos pos pos

combine: ex. (-2, 1, 2, 4) or something like that... or (pos x pos x pos x pos)