BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

By dating fossils

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Thu Jan 25, 2018 5:58 pm
By dating fossils of pollen and beetles, which returned after an Ice Age glacier left an area, it is possible to establish an approximate date when a warmer climate developed. In one glacial area, it appears from the insect record that a warm climate developed immediately after the melting of the glacier. From the pollen record, however, it appears that the warm climate did not develop until long after the glacier disappeared.

Each one of the following, if true, helps to explain the apparent discrepancy EXCEPT:

(A) Cold-weather beetle fossils can be mistaken for those of beetles that live in warm climates.
(B) Warm-weather plants cannot establish themselves as quickly as can beetles in a new environment.
(C) Beetles can survive in a relatively barren postglacial area by scavenging.
(D) Since planes spread unevenly in a new climate, researchers can mistake gaps in the pollen record as evidence of no new overall growth.
(E) Beetles are among the oldest insect species and are much older than many warm-weather plants.

What is wrong with other Options?

OA E
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ErikaPrepScholar » Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:05 am
This question asks us to find the answer that does NOT help to explain why scientists found older fossils of warm-weather beetles than of warm-weather pollen. This means we can eliminate any answers that help to explain why the warm-weather beetle fossils would be older.

(A) Cold-weather beetle fossils can be mistaken for those of beetles that live in warm climates.

If the older beetle fossils were actually cold-weather beetles, this would indicate that the warm climate may not have developed as early as the beetle record indicates. So the information from the beetle record may be incorrect, which would explain the difference. Eliminate.

(B) Warm-weather plants cannot establish themselves as quickly as can beetles in a new environment.
This indicates that while warm-weather beetles could have shown up as soon as the weather warmed up, plants might have taken a while. This would mean that pollen would not have shown up in the fossil record until later than beetles would have, which would explain the difference. Eliminate.

(C) Beetles can survive in a relatively barren postglacial area by scavenging.
This would indicate that beetles can survive pretty much right after the climate warmed up. Plants, on the other hand, might need a less barren landscape, which means they (and their pollen) wouldn't have shown up until later, which would explain the difference. Eliminate.

(D) Since planes spread unevenly in a new climate, researchers can mistake gaps in the pollen record as evidence of no new overall growth.
This indicates that plants could have been growing without leaving any evidence in the pollen record. This would mean that the information from the pollen record may be incorrectly interpreted, which would explain the difference. Eliminate.

(E) Beetles are among the oldest insect species and are much older than many warm-weather plants.
We know that beetles and warm-weather plants both "returned" after the weather warmed up - in other words, they both existed before the weather warmed up. So it doesn't really matter how old either of them were. What matters is when they "returned" to the area - either the older beetles or the younger plants could have shown up first! E doesn't explain anything, so we can eliminate.
Image

Erika John - Content Manager/Lead Instructor
https://gmat.prepscholar.com/gmat/s/

Get tutoring from me or another PrepScholar GMAT expert: https://gmat.prepscholar.com/gmat/s/tutoring/

Learn about our exclusive savings for BTG members (up to 25% off) and our 5 day free trial

Check out our PrepScholar GMAT YouTube channel, and read our expert guides on the PrepScholar GMAT blog
Join the discussion