Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Bumblebee Expert help needed.

Expert replies
by Neilsheth2 » Wed May 25, 2016 12:52 am
I chose 'D'-is it wrong because of the pronoun error ? Secondly if yes, GMAC has several times avoided pronoun ambiguity has an absolute rule ? Does it have any other problem?

Secondly , Why is A correct the meaning states that Bumblebees live in colonies of several hundred!! I find it weird to comprehend too.
Does it mean several hundred colonies ? Or does it mean the bees live in Several hundred - in the colonies?


Pls help Experts

Thank you in advance
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GMATGuruNY » Sat May 28, 2016 4:13 pm
Neilsheth2 wrote:I chose 'D'-is it wrong because of the pronoun error ? Secondly if yes, GMAC has several times avoided pronoun ambiguity has an absolute rule ? Does it have any other problem?

Secondly , Why is A correct the meaning states that Bumblebees live in colonies of several hundred!! I find it weird to comprehend too.
Does it mean several hundred colonies ? Or does it mean the bees live in Several hundred - in the colonies?
NUMBER + of is appropriate when referring to A SPECIFIC, KNOWN GROUP.
Correct:
A man was attacked by two of the lions at the zoo.
The store sold ten of its most expensive computers.
One hundred of the museum's paintings were saved.


NUMBER + of is not appropriate when referring AN ENTIRE CATEGORY.
Incorrect:
A man was attacked by two of lions.
The store sold ten of computers.
One hundred of paintings were saved.


When referring to an entire category, the preposition of is omitted:
Correct:
A man was attacked by two lions.
The store sold ten computers.
One hundred paintings were saved.


D: Bumblebees live in colonies that have several hundred of them.
Here, them seems to refer to bumblebees, conveying the following meaning:
several hundred of bumblebees.
Since NUMBER + of cannot serve to refer an entire category, eliminate D.

The students were divided into groups of three.
Conveyed meaning:
Each group was composed of three students.

OA: Bumblebees live in colonies of several hundred.
Conveyed meaning:
Each colony is composed of several hundred bumblebees.

Note:
PLURAL NUMBER + of can refer either to a specific, known group OR to an entire category.
Correct:
HUNDREDS of the museum's paintings were saved.
THOUSANDS of paintings were saved.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by RBBmba@2014 » Mon May 30, 2016 7:41 am
GMATGuruNY wrote: NUMBER + of is not appropriate when referring AN ENTIRE CATEGORY.
Incorrect:
One hundred of paintings were saved.
.
.
.
Note:
PLURAL NUMBER + of can refer either to a specific, known group OR to AN ENTIRE CATEGORY.
Correct:
THOUSANDS of paintings were saved.
Mitch - One hundred and THOUSANDS are BOTH PLURAL ENTITIES. Right ?

If so, then how BOTH of your above TWO quotes can be TRUE at the same time ? Where is the catch ?

Please explain.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue May 31, 2016 5:53 am
RBBmba@2014 wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote: NUMBER + of is not appropriate when referring AN ENTIRE CATEGORY.
Incorrect:
One hundred of paintings were saved.
.
.
.
Note:
PLURAL NUMBER + of can refer either to a specific, known group OR to AN ENTIRE CATEGORY.
Correct:
THOUSANDS of paintings were saved.
Mitch - One hundred and THOUSANDS are BOTH PLURAL ENTITIES. Right ?

If so, then how BOTH of your above TWO quotes can be TRUE at the same time ? Where is the catch ?

Please explain.
Whereas two and one hundred are actual numbers, hundreds and thousands are each a synonym for MULTITUDES.
Since we can say multitudes of uses, we can also say hundreds of uses or thousands of uses.
But we cannot say two of uses or one hundred of uses.
As noted above, ACTUAL NUMBER + of cannot serve to refer to an entire category.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion