BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Black plague

Expert replies
by anurag_7 » Sun Feb 15, 2015 5:20 am
Researchers studying the spread of the Black Plague in sixteenth-century England claim that certain people survived the epidemic because they carried a genetic mutation, known as Delta-32, that is known to prevent the bacteria that causes the Plague from overtaking the immune system. To support this hypothesis, the researchers tested the direct descendants of the residents of an English town where an unusually large proportion of people survived the Plague. More than half of these descendants tested positive for the mutation Delta-32, a figure nearly three times higher than that found in other locations.

The researchers' hypothesis is based on which of the following assumptions?


a. Delta-32 does not prevent a carrier from contracting any disease other than the Plague.


b. The Plague is not similar to other diseases caused by bacteria.


c. Delta-32 did not exist in its current form until the sixteenth century.


d. No one who tested positive for Delta-32 has ever contracted a disease caused by bacteria.


e. The Plague does not cause genetic mutations such as Delta-32.

Can anyone explain why option d is wrong?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Abhijit K » Sun Feb 15, 2015 5:48 am
I think it should be option 'b'
Option D is incorrect because the passage specifically talks of plague causing bacteria and does not talk of all diseases caused by bacteria.
Also option b is correct because if Plague is similar to other diseases caused by bacteria then delta 32 should prevent the people from all bacterial diseases.
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Sun Feb 15, 2015 6:13 am
Consider what an extreme sentiment 'd' expresses:

d. No one who tested positive for Delta-32 has ever contracted a disease caused by bacteria.


Imagine that you have this special gene. The gene allowed your ancestors to survive the plague, and subsequently, it was passed down to you. Would you assume, then, that because you have this gene you'll never contract any disease caused by bacteria? Of course not. You can still get sick. You're just less likely to die of the Plague, which, to be fair, is still a pretty nice perk.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by Abhijit K » Sun Feb 15, 2015 6:19 am
What is the answer to this question and more importantly why?
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Sun Feb 15, 2015 6:50 am
Here we have a classic causality argument. In essence, having Delta-32 allows people to survive the plague.

There are two common potential problems with a causality argument. In this case, maybe something else, other than this gene, allowed these people to survive the Plague. Second, maybe cause and effect are reversed, and somehow contracting and surviving the Plague led to people getting this gene.

Watch what happens to answer choice E when we negate it: The Plague does cause genetic mutations such as Delta-32.

Well, if this is true, then survivors likely didn't survive the Plague because they had this special gene, but rather they have this special gene because they survived the Plague. There's no reason to believe that the gene confers any benefit at all. So the negation of E utterly destroys the argument by reversing cause and effect. Anytime you have an assumption question, and the negation of an answer destroys the argument, you know that answer must be correct.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion