The sum of the integers in list S is the same as the sum of the integers in list T. Does S contain more integers than T?
1) The average (arithmetic mean) of the integers in S is less than the average (arithmetic mean) of the integers in T.
2) The median of the integers in S is greater than the median of the integers in T.
Let's say S is composed of 2,2,2,2 &2 , then the sum of these numbers is 10 and then mean is 2 and T is composed of 5 & 5 for a total sum of 10 and a mean of 5.
How can I assess 2)?
Average + Median
This topic has expert replies
- grockit_jake
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:49 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Thanked: 16 times
The simple average formula can be expressed: Avg = SUM/# , or as SUM = Avg*#
The stimulus tells us that SUM(t) = SUM(s), therefore we know the products of their respective Avgs and #s must be equal
(1) Avg(s) < Avg(t), therefore #(t) >#(s) to make Avg*# = Avg*#. Sufficient.
(2) The stimulus does not say that the group of numbers is evenly distributed. Therefore, outliers can skew the mean in either direction while keeping the median the same. Regardless, the relationship of the median doesn't provide information about the relative averages or number of integers. Insufficient.
The stimulus tells us that SUM(t) = SUM(s), therefore we know the products of their respective Avgs and #s must be equal
(1) Avg(s) < Avg(t), therefore #(t) >#(s) to make Avg*# = Avg*#. Sufficient.
(2) The stimulus does not say that the group of numbers is evenly distributed. Therefore, outliers can skew the mean in either direction while keeping the median the same. Regardless, the relationship of the median doesn't provide information about the relative averages or number of integers. Insufficient.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:10 pm
- Thanked: 50 times
- Followed by:4 members
This is official problem but why OA is A.
Sum of integers in S = Sum of integers in T = SUM (Either +ve or -ve)
No of integers in S = s
No of integers in T = t
Integers may be -ve or +ve. It is not mentioned.
Statement 1:
Assume SUM = 6
6 / s < 6 / t; s > t
Assume SUM = -6
-6 / s < -6 / t; 6 / s > 6 / t; s < t
Not Sufficient
Click Here to open screen short
Sum of integers in S = Sum of integers in T = SUM (Either +ve or -ve)
No of integers in S = s
No of integers in T = t
Integers may be -ve or +ve. It is not mentioned.
Statement 1:
Assume SUM = 6
6 / s < 6 / t; s > t
Assume SUM = -6
-6 / s < -6 / t; 6 / s > 6 / t; s < t
Not Sufficient
Click Here to open screen short
- kevincanspain
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:17 am
- Location: madrid
- Thanked: 171 times
- Followed by:64 members
- GMAT Score:790
I'm afraid you have assumed that we are dealing with positive integers.grockit_jake wrote:The simple average formula can be expressed: Avg = SUM/# , or as SUM = Avg*#
The stimulus tells us that SUM(t) = SUM(s), therefore we know the products of their respective Avgs and #s must be equal
(1) Avg(s) < Avg(t), therefore #(t) >#(s) to make Avg*# = Avg*#. Sufficient.
(2) The stimulus does not say that the group of numbers is evenly distributed. Therefore, outliers can skew the mean in either direction while keeping the median the same. Regardless, the relationship of the median doesn't provide information about the relative averages or number of integers. Insufficient.
If x is the sum of each set, x/s and x/t are the numbers of elements in S and T, where s and t are the averages of the elements in S and T respectively.
We need to know whether x/s > x/t
(1) Given s < t , 1/s > 1/t
If x > 0 x/s > x/t YES
If x > 0, x/s < x/t NO
NOT SUFF
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
- Patrick_GMATFix
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:30 am
- Thanked: 335 times
- Followed by:98 members
This is a gmatprep problem (GMATPrep question 1335) for which the official answer is A
However, like the people above, I don't see how A can be right. We know that sum = avg*#of terms, so average is sum/#of terms. Let s and t be the number of terms. Rephrase: is s>t ?
My approach to statement (1) is: This statement tells us that sum/s < sum/t. Cross multiply to get sum*t < sum*s. We then have two possibilities when we divide both sides by sum.
-Patrick
However, like the people above, I don't see how A can be right. We know that sum = avg*#of terms, so average is sum/#of terms. Let s and t be the number of terms. Rephrase: is s>t ?
My approach to statement (1) is: This statement tells us that sum/s < sum/t. Cross multiply to get sum*t < sum*s. We then have two possibilities when we divide both sides by sum.
- If sum>0, we get t<s. So the answer to the original Q would be YES.
- If sum<0, we get t>s, and the answer to the original Q would be NO
-Patrick
- Check out my site: GMATFix.com
- To prep my students I use this tool >> (screenshots, video)
- Ask me about tutoring.
I don't believe you can cross multiply this inequality because, like you said, we don't know if sum is positive and don't know if we should flip the sign. I originally thought it was A but your answer made me think about it for another minute.My approach to statement (1) is: This statement tells us that sum/s < sum/t. Cross multiply to get sum*t < sum*s. We then have two possibilities when we divide both sides by sum.
- Patrick_GMATFix
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:30 am
- Thanked: 335 times
- Followed by:98 members
I actually agree with you, but the official answer does not. If you read my full post, you'll note that at the end I wrote:MrE2All wrote: I don't believe you can cross multiply this inequality because, like you said, we don't know if sum is positive and don't know if we should flip the sign. I originally thought it was A but your answer made me think about it for another minute.
-PatrickBecause we have conflicting data, I believe (1) is not sufficient. I simply don't know why the official answer is A.
- Check out my site: GMATFix.com
- To prep my students I use this tool >> (screenshots, video)
- Ask me about tutoring.
Let S contain s integers from S1, S2, ......., Ss
Let T contain t integers from T1, T2, ......., Tt
Now, it is given that Sum(S) = Sum(T)
1. Sum(S)/s < Sum(T)/t
Case 1: Assume Sum(S) <0 and Sum(T)<0
Case 2: Assume Sum(S) <0 and Sum(T)>0 : Cannot Exist as Sum(S) = Sum(T)
Case 3: Assume Sum(S) >0 and Sum(T)<0 : Cannot Exist as Sum(S) = Sum(T)
Case 4: Assume Sum(S) >0 and Sum(T)>0
Case 1: Assume Sum(S) <0 and Sum(T)<0
=> |Sum(S)|/s > |Sum(T)|/t
=> s/t < |Sum(S)|/|Sum(T)| = 1
=> s < t always YES
Case 4: Assume Sum(S) >0 and Sum(T)>0
=> |Sum(S)|/s < |Sum(T)|/t
=> s/t > |Sum(S)|/|Sum(T)| = 1
=> s > t always YES
Case 1 and case 4 both gives different results depending on whether the sum of the integers is +ve or not. So (1) by itself is not sufficient by itself. Therefore, guess what OA is wrong.
Now let's see (2):
Median(S) > Median(T)
For any set of integers, Median effects neither sum nor number of integers.
Example,
S = 1,2,3 :: Median = 2 :: Sum = 6 :: #=3
T = 1,1,4 :: Median = 1 :: Sum = 6 :: #=3 (You can say there is an answer to Q that s=t always if median(S) > median (T))
We need one more to clarify
T = 1,1,1,3 :: Median = 1 :: Sum = 6 :: #=4 (=>s<t)
Hence, neither (1) nor (2) is suffcient.
Correct answer is (E)
Let T contain t integers from T1, T2, ......., Tt
Now, it is given that Sum(S) = Sum(T)
1. Sum(S)/s < Sum(T)/t
Case 1: Assume Sum(S) <0 and Sum(T)<0
Case 2: Assume Sum(S) <0 and Sum(T)>0 : Cannot Exist as Sum(S) = Sum(T)
Case 3: Assume Sum(S) >0 and Sum(T)<0 : Cannot Exist as Sum(S) = Sum(T)
Case 4: Assume Sum(S) >0 and Sum(T)>0
Case 1: Assume Sum(S) <0 and Sum(T)<0
=> |Sum(S)|/s > |Sum(T)|/t
=> s/t < |Sum(S)|/|Sum(T)| = 1
=> s < t always YES
Case 4: Assume Sum(S) >0 and Sum(T)>0
=> |Sum(S)|/s < |Sum(T)|/t
=> s/t > |Sum(S)|/|Sum(T)| = 1
=> s > t always YES
Case 1 and case 4 both gives different results depending on whether the sum of the integers is +ve or not. So (1) by itself is not sufficient by itself. Therefore, guess what OA is wrong.
Now let's see (2):
Median(S) > Median(T)
For any set of integers, Median effects neither sum nor number of integers.
Example,
S = 1,2,3 :: Median = 2 :: Sum = 6 :: #=3
T = 1,1,4 :: Median = 1 :: Sum = 6 :: #=3 (You can say there is an answer to Q that s=t always if median(S) > median (T))
We need one more to clarify
T = 1,1,1,3 :: Median = 1 :: Sum = 6 :: #=4 (=>s<t)
Hence, neither (1) nor (2) is suffcient.
Correct answer is (E)