• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Reach higher with Artificial Intelligence. Guaranteed
Now free for 30 days

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## automobile insurance includes compensation

tagged by:

This topic has 1 expert reply and 7 member replies
gmatdriller Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
04 Jul 2010
Posted:
418 messages
Followed by:
2 members
6

#### automobile insurance includes compensation

Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:27 am
In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation
for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of
having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in
countries where whiplash is not covered. Some commentators
have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no
objective test for whiplash
, spurious reports of whiplash
injuries cannotbe readily identified. These commentators are,
however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the
countries with the higherrates of reported whiplash injuries, half of
the reported cases are spurious
: clearly, in countires where
automobile insurance doesnot include compensation for whiplash,
people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that
they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the
following roles?

A: The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion
that the arguemnt criticizes; the second is that conclusion
B: The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion
that the arguemnt criticizes; the second is the position that the
argument defends
C: The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion
that the argument accepts; the second is the position that the a
rgument defends
D: The first is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to
support a conclusion that the argument defends; the second is
the position that the argument opposes.
E: The first presents a claim that is disputed in the argument; the
second is a conclusion that has been drawn on the basis of that
claim.

There has been variants of this question and solutions; I'd
appreciate explanations/strategy for solving under 2mins.

Thanks.

turbo jet Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
08 Jun 2009
Posted:
154 messages
Followed by:
3 members
5
Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:08 am
IMO: A

Was tossing between A and D for a while. However on a closer look, the first portion of Answer D is incorrect ( 1st boldface is a premise/evidence and not a conclusion) although the second portion of Answer D is correct.

E gets eliminated automatically as it says that the Boldface 1 is a claim that is DISPUTED. It is not disputed. It is mentioned in the argument that is it CORRECT.

B: Second portion of Ans B is incorrect. The argument definitely DOES NOT DEFEND Boldface 2.

C: 1 portion of answer incorrect." support a conclusion that the argument ACCEPTS" The argument definitely does not support Boldface 2. Even second portion of answer is INCORRECT as boldface 2 is NOT what the argument defends.

Cheers
TJ

_________________
Life is Tom; I am Jerry

ankurmit Legendary Member
Joined
02 Nov 2009
Posted:
516 messages
Followed by:
1 members
14
Test Date:
06-06-2011
GMAT Score:
710
Mon Mar 28, 2011 7:57 am

_________________
--------
Ankur mittal

HSPA Legendary Member
Joined
28 Jan 2011
Posted:
1101 messages
Followed by:
13 members
47
Target GMAT Score:
720
GMAT Score:
640
Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:41 am
IMO D

gmatdriller Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
04 Jul 2010
Posted:
418 messages
Followed by:
2 members
6
Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:52 am
HSPA,

HSPA Legendary Member
Joined
28 Jan 2011
Posted:
1101 messages
Followed by:
13 members
47
Target GMAT Score:
720
GMAT Score:
640
Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:07 am
On these bold face...my approach is bottoms up... I usually read the options first.. because they are the actual questions.
Opinion: Here all 5 questions are asking the conclusion.. so what is the actual conclusion??... matter after the word "clearly"

A) 'A' says the second is the conclusion but for me it looks like premise
B) Argument for the second is not defending but blasts it with words "wrong to draw"
C) Same as B
D) "I liked oppossing"
E) It says that the second is the conclusion

I dont know but Iliked oppossing ... so it is not I but my heart chose that option...

### GMAT/MBA Expert

Geva@EconomistGMAT GMAT Instructor
Joined
12 Sep 2010
Posted:
905 messages
Followed by:
123 members
378
GMAT Score:
760
Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:22 am
There are no magic shortcuts for these. Read the argument, disregarding the boldface portions at first, just to get an idea what's going on. Then come up with your own definition of the specific roles of the boldface portions: are they premises/conclusions? If the argument has two sides, are they on the same side or opposing side? Do they support each other or oppose each other?

In this argument there are two sides:

1) some commentators say that half of the reported cases are spurious, based on the premise (1st boldface) that there is no objective test for whiplash.

2) the opposing side is the one the argument supports: the commentators are wrong in reaching the conclusion (2nd boldface) that the reports are spurious. It's not that people file false claims, but rather that people report less if no money is involved.

So the first is a piece of evidence that supports the conclusion in the second, but the argument opposes that conclusion.

With this definition, go to the answer choices and aggressively eliminate those who do not match your definition. If you've done a good job of analyzing the argument and the roles of the boldfaces, this is where you can save time: eliminate the answer choices that clearly do not match your definition, and whatever's left must be the right one.

gmatdriller wrote:
In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation
for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of
having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in
countries where whiplash is not covered. Some commentators
have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no
objective test for whiplash
, spurious reports of whiplash
injuries cannotbe readily identified. These commentators are,
however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the
countries with the higherrates of reported whiplash injuries, half of
the reported cases are spurious
: clearly, in countires where
automobile insurance doesnot include compensation for whiplash,
people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that
they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the
following roles?

A: The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion
that the argument criticizes; the second is that conclusion
This is correct answer it matches the definition of the role, while the others do not.
B: The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion
that the argument criticizes; the second is the position that the
argument defends
Right on the first one, wrong on the second one: the argument does not defend the conclusion in the 2nd boldface.
C: The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion
that the argument accepts; the second is the position that the argument defends
Wrong on both counts: the argument does not accept or defend the conclusion.
D: The first is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to
support a conclusion that the argument defends; the second is
the position that the argument opposes.
the first is not an intermediate conclusion, but a hard core fact. Also, the conclusion it supports is not one the argument defends.
E: The first presents a claim that is disputed in the argument; the
second is a conclusion that has been drawn on the basis of that
claim.
The claim in the first is not disputed: you cannot argue with the fact that there is no objective test for whiplash.

There has been variants of this question and solutions; I'd
appreciate explanations/strategy for solving under 2mins.

Thanks.

_________________
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com

Last edited by Geva@EconomistGMAT on Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:18 am; edited 1 time in total

Free 7-Day Test Prep with Economist GMAT Tutor - Receive free access to the top-rated GMAT prep course including a 1-on-1 strategy session, 2 full-length tests, and 5 ask-a-tutor messages. Get started now.
ankurmit Legendary Member
Joined
02 Nov 2009
Posted:
516 messages
Followed by:
1 members
14
Test Date:
06-06-2011
GMAT Score:
710
Sat Mar 26, 2011 4:27 am
IMO C

_________________
--------
Ankur mittal

gmatdriller Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
04 Jul 2010
Posted:
418 messages
Followed by:
2 members
6
Sun Apr 03, 2011 12:25 am
Geva and TJ have given clear explanations.
OA, as supported by both contributors, is
A

### Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 84 topics
2 LUANDATO 60 topics
3 ardz24 56 topics
4 M7MBA 50 topics
5 AAPL 44 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

136 posts
2 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

133 posts
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

130 posts
4 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

118 posts
5 Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

114 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts