BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Assumption_success of the commissioner

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:09 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:7 members

Assumption_success of the commissioner

by Soumita Ghosh » Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:00 pm
The city's transportation department has noticed that the city's extensive public bus system generally runs behind schedule on days when traffic is heavier in the city. The transportation commissioner concluded that the traffic prevents the buses from reaching their stops on time, despite the existence of a number of bus-only lanes throughout the city. He has therefore proposed creating additional bus-only lanes on city streets to allow more buses to bypass traffic.

The success of the commissioner's proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?

A)Similar proposals have been effectively implemented in other cities.

B)The city's bus-only lanes do not contribute substantially to gridlock by reducing the number of lanes available to other traffic.

C)An increase in bus fare is not necessary as a result of the proposal.

D)The city owns enough buses to cover all established routes.

E)Automobile drivers will not object to the proposal.

OA B

Can anyone explain me how OA is correct??

Conclusion : additional bus-only lanes on city streets to allow more buses to bypass traffic.

If the assumption is like this: The city's bus-only lanes do contribute substantially to gridlock by reducing the number of lanes available to other traffic. Then will also Conclusion remain true and same.

If the assumption is like this: The city's bus-only lanes do not contribute substantially to gridlock by reducing the number of lanes available to other traffic.Then will also Conclusion remain true and same.

So please explain me how can OA is correct??
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:04 am
Soumita Ghosh wrote:The city's transportation department has noticed that the city's extensive public bus system generally runs behind schedule on days when traffic is heavier in the city. The transportation commissioner concluded that the traffic prevents the buses from reaching their stops on time, despite the existence of a number of bus-only lanes throughout the city. He has therefore proposed creating additional bus-only lanes on city streets to allow more buses to bypass traffic.

The success of the commissioner's proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?

A)Similar proposals have been effectively implemented in other cities.

B)The city's bus-only lanes do not contribute substantially to gridlock by reducing the number of lanes available to other traffic.

C)An increase in bus fare is not necessary as a result of the proposal.

D)The city owns enough buses to cover all established routes.

E)Automobile drivers will not object to the proposal.
This a PLANNING argument.
The plan links CREATING ADDITIONAL BUS-ONLY LANES to HELPING BUSES REACH THEIR STOPS ON TIME.
The assumption is WHAT MUST BE TRUE for the plan to work.
Answer choice B, negated: The city's bus-only lanes CONTRIBUTE SUBSTANTIALLY TO GRIDLOCK by reducing the number of lanes available to other traffic.
If the bus-only lanes cause gridlock, then the argument cannot conclude that CREATING ADDITIONAL BUS-ONLY LANES will help buses REACH THEIR STOPS ON TIME.
Since the negation of B invalidates the conclusion, B is the necessary assumption: WHAT MUST BE TRUE for the plan to work.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:06 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:8 members

by charu_mahajan » Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:19 am
Conclusion : additional bus-only lanes on city streets to allow more buses to bypass traffic.

If the assumption is like this: The city's bus-only lanes do contribute substantially to gridlock by reducing the number of lanes available to other traffic. Then will also Conclusion remain true and same.
Hi Soumita,

You are on the right track and did negate it correctly - The city's bus-only lanes contribute substantially to gridlock by reducing the number of lanes available to other traffic.
Now if the bus only lanes are contributing substantially to gridlock, is it a good idea to increase the lanes??? This is hitting the conclusion.

The conclusion here is - creation of additional lanes.

See how negating the argument made the conclusion fall apart.
Do you get it now??
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2016 3:51 am

by toro86717498 » Sat Oct 08, 2016 4:57 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Soumita Ghosh wrote:The city's transportation department has noticed that the city's extensive public bus system generally runs behind schedule on days when traffic is heavier in the city. The transportation commissioner concluded that the traffic prevents the buses from reaching their stops on time, despite the existence of a number of bus-only lanes throughout the city. He has therefore proposed creating additional bus-only lanes on city streets to allow more buses to bypass traffic.

The success of the commissioner's proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?

A)Similar proposals have been effectively implemented in other cities.

B)The city's bus-only lanes do not contribute substantially to gridlock by reducing the number of lanes available to other traffic.

C)An increase in bus fare is not necessary as a result of the proposal.

D)The city owns enough buses to cover all established routes.

E)Automobile drivers will not object to the proposal.
This a PLANNING argument.
The plan links CREATING ADDITIONAL BUS-ONLY LANES to HELPING BUSES REACH THEIR STOPS ON TIME.
The assumption is WHAT MUST BE TRUE for the plan to work.
Answer choice B, negated: The city's bus-only lanes CONTRIBUTE SUBSTANTIALLY TO GRIDLOCK by reducing the number of lanes available to other traffic.
If the bus-only lanes cause gridlock, then the argument cannot conclude that CREATING ADDITIONAL BUS-ONLY LANES will help buses REACH THEIR STOPS ON TIME.
Since the negation of B invalidates the conclusion, B is the necessary assumption: WHAT MUST BE TRUE for the plan to work.

The correct answer is B.

Hi Mitch,

By negating the choice to find the assumption, it must weaken the argument. However, (B) seems to strengthen the argument because "The city's bus-only lanes CONTRIBUTE SUBSTANTIALLY TO GRIDLOCK by reducing the number of lanes available to other traffic."

in other words, the city's traffic is better if increasing the number of lanes. Consequently, if we negate the argument, it seems to strengthen the argument.

Can you please clarify my points? Million thanks in advance.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1