BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Assumption or strengthen?

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:35 am
Location: TASHKENT
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:640

Assumption or strengthen?

by hoji » Sat Jan 14, 2012 2:09 am
The use of radar detectors in commercial vehicles was banned because commercial truck and bus drivers were using these devices to drive faster than the posted speed limit without fear of arrest. Since drivers of noncommercial vehicles also use radar detectors and since speeding decreases safety for any vehicle, use of radar detectors should also be banned in noncommercial vehicles to increase safety.
Source: Gprep:

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?
A. The average noncommercial-vehicle driver is involved in less long-distance driving than is the average commercial-vehicle driver.
B. In many places airplanes or helicopters are used rather than radar to locate vehicles traveling faster than the posted speed limit.
C. The ban on radar detectors in commercial vehicles has been effective in deterring them from speeding.
D. Traffic accidents involving a truck or bus generally pose a greater threat of injury or death than do other accidents.
E. Radar detectors are sometimes set off by devices other than the law enforcement devices that the radar detectors were built to detect.

OA [spoiler]C[/spoiler]

i think that c is assumption of the argument;
question: does an assumption always strengthen the argument?
I know of no more encouraging fact than the unquestionable ability of a man to elevate his life by conscious endeavor.
Henry David Thoreau.

Sleep GMAT, eat GMAT, beat GMAT!
______________________________
Quant ----> 51
Verbal----> 44+
GMAT ----> 750+
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:34 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by westom » Sat Jan 14, 2012 7:16 pm
hoji wrote: question: does an assumption always strengthen the argument?
To be credible, the argument should always replace all assumptions with facts. That is the difference between critical thinking and propaganda. Propaganda feeds off of personal biases. Most (even critical thinkers) will often use their own biases as if fact.

Assumption C discusses two 'nouns' found in the argument. "Ban on radar detectors in commercial vehicles" and "deterring them from speeding". (Other assumptions introduce 'nouns' not found in the argument.)

The argument defines no relationship between both nouns. The 'verb' "has been effective" is in the assumption. That assumption necessary to complete the argument.

The argument only implies a relationship (maybe or maybe not) between speeding and use of radar detectors. Radar detectors might cause speeding (A causes B). Or radar detector and speeding is coincidental (A and B exist independently). Or speeding causes use of radar detectors (B causes A).

To make the original argument valid, a reader must add an assumption. That radar detectors cause, encourage, or make possible speeding (A causes or results in B). None of those 'verbs' are defined or even exist.

A reader will often make that assumption using personal biases. Biases can come from anywhere including hearsay in a newspaper article or from racism. Did racism cause one to create that assumption. Probably not. But probably (maybe or maybe not) is not 'no'.

In this case, the argument is missing a necessary and hard fact. That radar detectors cause or result in speeding. Without assumption C, then the argument loses credibility.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
Thanked: 149 times
Followed by:32 members
GMAT Score:760

by avik.ch » Sat Jan 14, 2012 10:03 pm
hoji wrote: i think that c is assumption of the argument;
question: does an assumption always strengthen the argument?
Please note there is a difference between strengthening the argument and supporting the argument.

We generally categorize assumption in two ways :
- assumption in a supporter role.
- assumption in a defender role.

From first type, we can consider that the assumption do support the argument in some way or the other. But assumption do not work in the same way as strengthener works.

An assumption : must be true for the argument to be true
an strengthener : add something to the argument, but the argument can stand without this.

So in CR, Strengthening is not same as support or defend.

Few days back, I was quiet confused on this. Posted something on this concept. Please take a look at the experts explanation on it.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/assumption-i ... 00004.html


Hope this helps !!
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 626
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 2:50 am
Location: Ahmedabad
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:10 members

by ronnie1985 » Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:28 pm
(C) is the only option supporting the conclusion.
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:36 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by Prashant Ranjan » Fri Sep 07, 2012 11:50 pm
An assumption can be a strengthener , however the reverse isn't true. A strengthener is something that just makes the conclusion more likely to be true. However an assumption is something that if isn't true, invalidates the argument.
Here the conclusion says that the ban on usage of radar in non commercial vehicles will also increase the safety.
So the most basic assumption here springs from the word "ALSO". The argument assumes that the ban was effective in deterring the commercial vehicles from using radar.

(E) is not a strengthener here. "Sometimes" doesn't reveal the frequency of the error performed by radar equipped Non commercial vehicles. It can be 1 in 100 or 51 in 100. So we don't know.

Thanks
Prashant
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1