BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Asbestos

Expert replies
by ssgmatter » Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:59 pm
Asbestos, an almost indestructible mineral once installed as building insulation, poses no health risk unless the asbestos is disturbed and asbestos fibers are released into the environment. Since removing asbestos from buildings disturbs it, thereby releasing asbestos fibers, the government should not require removal of all asbestos insulation.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Asbestos poses far less risk to health than does smoking, drug and alcohol abuse, improper diet or lack of exercise.
(B) Asbestos can post a health threat to workers who remove it without wearing required protective gear.
(C) Some kinds of asbestos, when disturbed, pose greater health risks than do other kinds.
(D) Asbestos is inevitably disturbed by building renovations or building demolition.
(E) Much of the time, removed asbestos is buried in landfills and forgotten with no guarantee that it will not be disturbed again.
Best-
Amit
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by dream700 » Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:15 pm
IMO E.

(A) Asbestos poses far less risk to health than does smoking, drug and alcohol abuse, improper diet or lack of exercise.
==> Out of scope. "Asb and smoking"?

(B) Asbestos can post a health threat to workers who remove it without wearing required protective gear.
==>This weakens. If they do wear the masks and all, no threat to the workers.

(C) Some kinds of asbestos, when disturbed, pose greater health risks than do other kinds.
==>Out of scope.

(D) Asbestos is inevitably disturbed by building renovations or building demolition.
==> Weakens the arg. If they are to be disturbed anyhow, it makes sense to remove them now.

(E) Much of the time, removed asbestos is buried in landfills and forgotten with no guarantee that it will not be disturbed again.
==>This supports. Even after removing, there is no guarantee that it will not be disturbed again, then what's the point of removing it at the first place?

Deutsch750
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:26 pm
dream700 wrote:IMO E.

(A) Asbestos poses far less risk to health than does smoking, drug and alcohol abuse, improper diet or lack of exercise.
==> Out of scope. "Asb and smoking"?

(B) Asbestos can post a health threat to workers who remove it without wearing required protective gear.
==>This weakens. If they do wear the masks and all, no threat to the workers.

(C) Some kinds of asbestos, when disturbed, pose greater health risks than do other kinds.
==>Out of scope.

(D) Asbestos is inevitably disturbed by building renovations or building demolition.
==> Weakens the arg. If they are to be disturbed anyhow, it makes sense to remove them now.

(E) Much of the time, removed asbestos is buried in landfills and forgotten with no guarantee that it will not be disturbed again.
==>This supports. Even after removing, there is no guarantee that it will not be disturbed again, then what's the point of removing it at the first place?

Deutsch750
Perfect!

Cheers

Phil
Best-
Amit
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:03 am
I neither like any of the options nor the passage. however, E is my answer.
ssgmatter wrote:Asbestos, an almost indestructible mineral once installed as building insulation, poses no health risk unless the asbestos is disturbed and asbestos fibers are released into the environment. Since removing asbestos from buildings disturbs it, thereby releasing asbestos fibers, the government should not require removal of all asbestos insulation.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Asbestos poses far less risk to health than does smoking, drug and alcohol abuse, improper diet or lack of exercise. - Out of scope
(B) Asbestos can post a health threat to workers who remove it without wearing required protective gear. - what happen if workers wear protective gear? Out of scope
(C) Some kinds of asbestos, when disturbed, pose greater health risks than do other kinds. - Then Govt. should use other kinds of asbestos. Passage talks about the asbestos and not about certain type, out
(D) Asbestos is inevitably disturbed by building renovations or building demolition. - Passage talks the same, out.
(E) Much of the time, removed asbestos is buried in landfills and forgotten with no guarantee that it will not be disturbed again. - Best among the worst
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by selango » Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:15 am
Yes Option E is better.
--Anand--
Join the discussion