As the former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a board member for 28 years, Joan Philkill attended more than 400 meetings and reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications.
A) As the former
B) The former
C) Former
D) She was
E) As the
As the former Chair...
Answer is E.
Answers with the word "former" are not parallel with board member- you would expect "former chair and former board member".
Also, more importantly adding former changes the meaning of the sentence.
She atteneded (past tense) those meetings and and reviewed those applications as THE chair and/or board member, not as THE "former" chair/board member.
Answers with the word "former" are not parallel with board member- you would expect "former chair and former board member".
Also, more importantly adding former changes the meaning of the sentence.
She atteneded (past tense) those meetings and and reviewed those applications as THE chair and/or board member, not as THE "former" chair/board member.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:33 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
IMO E.Canman wrote:Answer is E.
Answers with the word "former" are not parallel with board member- you would expect "former chair and former board member".
Also, more importantly adding former changes the meaning of the sentence.
She atteneded (past tense) those meetings and and reviewed those applications as THE chair and/or board member, not as THE "former" chair/board member.
but @Canman, I'm sorry but I don agree with ur reasoning of parallelism, a person can no longer be the chair but he/she can continue as a member of the organization.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:21 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
As is used for comparing verb.
I would go with D,
any one can explain?
I would go with D,
any one can explain?
Please share your idea and your reasoning
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:21 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
She can modify for Joan Philkill.
Others cannot.
Others cannot.
Please share your idea and your reasoning
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
- uwhusky
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pm
- Thanked: 74 times
- Followed by:4 members
I guess for A to be right, we would have to say:
As the former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a [current/former] board member for 28 years, Joan Philkill attended more than 400 meetings and reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications.
As the former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a [current/former] board member for 28 years, Joan Philkill attended more than 400 meetings and reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:54 am
- Thanked: 1 times
i'm still a little mystified as to why A is wrong...uwhusky wrote:I guess for A to be right, we would have to say:
As the former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a [current/former] board member for 28 years, Joan Philkill attended more than 400 meetings and reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications.
i thought the sentence meant that she was a former chair of the planning board...a position she filled for 18 years...
if the sentence were to read, "As the former chair of the board, Joan attended more than 400 meetings.." wouldn't it be correct? why does tacking on "For 18 consecutive years" make it wrong? please help. thanks!
- uwhusky
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pm
- Thanked: 74 times
- Followed by:4 members
I must have posted the original response before I understood the question.
The issue with A is that it is illogical to suggest that Joan was a "former chair" for 18 consecutive years.
For example, you would say that you were a teacher for 18 years, but you wouldn't say that you were a former teacher for 18 years.
Hopefully I make sense in the explanation =).
The issue with A is that it is illogical to suggest that Joan was a "former chair" for 18 consecutive years.
For example, you would say that you were a teacher for 18 years, but you wouldn't say that you were a former teacher for 18 years.
Hopefully I make sense in the explanation =).
Yep.