BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Argonia

Expert replies
by ketkoag » Mon May 11, 2009 2:13 am
In Argonia the average rate drivers pay for car accident insurance is regulated to allow insurance companies to make a reasonable profit. Under the regulations, the rate any individual driver pays never depends on the actual distance driven by that driver each year. Therefore, Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidize the insurance of those who drive more than average.
The conclusion above would be properly drawn if it were also true that in Argonia
(A) the average accident insurance rate for all drivers rises whenever a substantial number of new drivers buy insurance
(B) the average cost to insurance companies of insuring drivers who drive less than the annual average is less than the average cost of insuring drivers who drive more than the annual average
(C) the lower the age of a driver, the higher the insurance rate paid by that driver
(D) insurance company profits would rise substantially if drivers were classified in terms of the actual number of miles they drive each year
(E) drivers who have caused insurance companies to pay costly claims generally pay insurance rates that are equal to or lower than those paid by other drivers


I got the correct answer by POE, but i am not convinced how option B can be inferred from the stimuli above. How option B , if true, suggests that "Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidize the insurance of those who drive more than average." As i think that option B suggests that people below average are paying less amount than the people who are more than average, so they are not subsidizing the others.
Please explain if i am missing something.....
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: Argonia

by Pranay » Mon May 11, 2009 2:48 am
ketkoag wrote:In Argonia the average rate drivers pay for car accident insurance is regulated to allow insurance companies to make a reasonable profit. Under the regulations, the rate any individual driver pays never depends on the actual distance driven by that driver each year. Therefore, Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidize the insurance of those who drive more than average.
The conclusion above would be properly drawn if it were also true that in Argonia
(A) the average accident insurance rate for all drivers rises whenever a substantial number of new drivers buy insurance
(B) the average cost to insurance companies of insuring drivers who drive less than the annual average is less than the average cost of insuring drivers who drive more than the annual average
(C) the lower the age of a driver, the higher the insurance rate paid by that driver
(D) insurance company profits would rise substantially if drivers were classified in terms of the actual number of miles they drive each year
(E) drivers who have caused insurance companies to pay costly claims generally pay insurance rates that are equal to or lower than those paid by other drivers


I got the correct answer by POE, but i am not convinced how option B can be inferred from the stimuli above. How option B , if true, suggests that "Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidize the insurance of those who drive more than average." As i think that option B suggests that people below average are paying less amount than the people who are more than average, so they are not subsidizing the others.
Please explain if i am missing something.....
Passage concludes,

The insurance paid by drivers who drive less than average compensates the insurance rate of drivers who drive more than average.

Thus, can be seen that the drivers who drive more than average, cost higher to the insurance company. This indicates that the two types of drivers are compensating the costs based on the no. of miles they drive. which is given in B.

Please correct if I am wrong. :)
Join the discussion

Re: Argonia

by ketkoag » Mon May 11, 2009 4:11 am
ok, so here the word subsidize means compensate, right?
but how compensating the higher revenue generators make more profit as the first statement says that "In Argonia the average rate drivers pay for car accident insurance is regulated to allow insurance companies to make a reasonable profit" Please elaborate further.....[/b]
Join the discussion

Re: Argonia

by Pranay » Mon May 11, 2009 4:35 am
ketkoag wrote:ok, so here the word subsidize means compensate, right?
but how compensating the higher revenue generators make more profit as the first statement says that "In Argonia the average rate drivers pay for car accident insurance is regulated to allow insurance companies to make a reasonable profit" Please elaborate further.....[/b]
Ketkoag,

Firstly, I interpret the statement in this way,

1. All drivers pay a constant amount of tax, giving reasonable profit to the insurance company, irrespective of the number of miles they drive.

2. But, the drivers who drive less than the avg. miles, subsidize the expenses for insurance company incurred while covering the drivers who drive more than the avg. miles.

Now, the question is targetting on the hidden assumption that links the above two statements.

From Options,

I find only B links the two statements properly by establishing a precise relationship between the expenses incurred between the driver who drive less than the avg, miles and the one who drives more than the avg. miles.

Hope, this would be of some help.

Pranay
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 1:00 pm
Answer is clearly B here
Join the discussion

by Brad.C » Sun May 15, 2016 1:34 pm
B looks better than other options
Join the discussion