BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

any other method

Expert replies
by raunekk » Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:56 am
19. If M and N are positive integers that have remainders of 1 and 3, respectively, when divided by 6, which of the following could NOT be a possible value of M+N?
(A) 86
(B) 52
(C) 34
(D) 28
(E) 10


is there any other way to solve tis problem??

what would be the fastest way to solve such problems..??

OA=A[spoiler][/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by floravaze » Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:08 am
hi,
first,are you sure the answer is A.Because it seems to me like the right answer should be E.let me explain.
when M is divided by 6,remainder is 1,so let's have an equation
M/6=x + 1
When N is divided by 6,remainder is 3,so
N/6=y + 3
When we cross-multiply,we get M=6x +6 and N=6y+18
Therefore M+N=9x+6y+24.
Looking at the answer choices,we see that the most unlikely choice is 10 coz the above equation already tells us that M+N must be greater than or equal to 24.Hope this helps.
touch the sky
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:34 am
i believe it is A and here's my thought process,

if remainder of M is 1, then M could be 6, and similarly N could be 9. then if 9+7 = 16 is divided 6, then remainder we get is 4.

so if we backsolve with the answer choices, any answer choice that doesn't yield a remainder 4 when divided by 6 should be our answer.

so 86/6 meets that logic so A.
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:09 am
M=6x+1
N=6y+3

M+N=6(x+y)+ 4

x+y must be bigger than 2, M+N must bigger than 16

E is the right answer
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:37 am
duongthang wrote:M=6x+1
N=6y+3

M+N=6(x+y)+ 4

x+y must be bigger than 2, M+N must bigger than 16

E is the right answer
This starts out well, but there is no reason why x+y must be larger than 2. There is nothing wrong with having a quotient of 0 in division: when you divide 5 by 6, for example, the quotient is 0 and the remainder is 5. x and y are the quotients here, and they can certainly be equal to 0.

That said, your approach is good to begin with. We know

M+N = 6(x+y) + 4

That means that M+N must be 4 larger than a multiple of 6, or in other words, that the remainder must be 4 when you divide M+N by 6. This is essentially what niraj found above by picking numbers. A is the only answer that gives a remainder different from 4 when you divide by 6.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by tokaitalbo » Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:52 am
For me, doing this out seems the easiest, and fastest.

if the remainder is 1, then M can only be 1,7,13,19,25
if the remainder is 3, then N can only be 3,9,15,21,27

start at the bottom (smallest) and use POE

cannot be E: 1+9=10
cannot be D: 27+1=28
cannot be C: 27+7=34
cannot be B: 25+27=52.

Answer must be A.
Join the discussion

Wrong approach?

by yvichman » Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:58 am
Can't you just divide each of the answer choices given, by 6 to find out if they give a remainder of 4 (3+1 as stated in the question). The one that does not have a remainder of 4 would give you the correct answer.

Is this an approach that would not work all the time?
Join the discussion

Re: Wrong approach?

by Ian Stewart » Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:26 am
yvichman wrote:Can't you just divide each of the answer choices given, by 6 to find out if they give a remainder of 4 (3+1 as stated in the question). The one that does not have a remainder of 4 would give you the correct answer.

Is this an approach that would not work all the time?
Yes, that's perfect. My post above is identical in method- I just wanted to demonstrate why the remainder needs to be equal to 4.
Join the discussion