BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Sun Sep 09, 2018 9:59 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 24, 0.82, and 5.096 are three terminating decimals. If r and s are positive integers and the ratio r/s is expressed as a decimal, is r/s a terminating decimal?

(1) 90 < r < 100
(2) s = 4

Source: Official Guide

OA B
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Sun Sep 09, 2018 10:48 pm
BTGmoderatorDC wrote:Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 24, 0.82, and 5.096 are three terminating decimals. If r and s are positive integers and the ratio r/s is expressed as a decimal, is r/s a terminating decimal?

(1) 90 < r < 100
(2) s = 4

Source: Official Guide

OA B
A ratio, here, r/s is a terminating decimal if s has only two prime factors: 2 and 5.

Note that there is no role of r, so Statement 1 is insufficient.

From Statement 2, we know that s = 4 has a prime factor 2, it's sufficient to collude that r/s is a terminating decimal.

The correct answer: B

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GRE Prep

Locations: GMAT Classes San Diego | GRE Prep Course Boston | GRE Prep Chicago | TOEFL Prep Classes NYC | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:01 am
BTGmoderatorDC wrote:Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 24, 0.82, and 5.096 are three terminating decimals. If r and s are positive integers and the ratio r/s is expressed as a decimal, is r/s a terminating decimal?

(1) 90 < r < 100
(2) s = 4

Source: Official Guide

OA B
Target question: Is r/s a terminating decimal?

Statement 1: 90 < r < 100
There are several pairs of values that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: r = 91 and s = 2, in which case r/s = 91/2 = 45.5 = a terminating decimal
Case b: r = 91 and s = 3, in which case r/s = 91/3 = 30.33333.... = a non-terminating decimal
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: s = 4
Notice that 1/4 = 0.25, 2/4 = 0.5 and 3/4 = 0.75
So, if the denominator is 4, the resulting decimal will definitely be a terminating decimal.
In other words, if s = 4 then r/s must be a terminating decimal.
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Aside: There's a nice rule that says something like,
If the prime factorization of the denominator contains only 2's and/or 5's, then the decimal version of the fraction will be a terminating decimal.
Since the denominator, 4 = (2)(2), the rule tells us that r/s must be a terminating decimal.

Answer: B

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:47 am
Here is further explanation on the logic of terminating decimals:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-decimals ... tml#583298
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Wed Sep 12, 2018 2:28 pm
BTGmoderatorDC wrote:Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 24, 0.82, and 5.096 are three terminating decimals. If r and s are positive integers and the ratio r/s is expressed as a decimal, is r/s a terminating decimal?

(1) 90 < r < 100
(2) s = 4

Source: Official Guide
\[r,s\,\, \geqslant 1\,\,\,{\text{ints}}\]
\[\frac{r}{s}\,\,\,\mathop = \limits^? \,\,\,\,{\text{terminating}}\]
\[\left( 1 \right)\,\,90 < r < 100\,\,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered}
\,\left( {r,s} \right) = \left( {95,5} \right)\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left( {\frac{{95}}{5} = \operatorname{int} } \right) \hfill \\
\,\left( {r,s} \right) = \left( {91,3} \right)\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left( {\frac{{91}}{3} = 30\frac{1}{3} = 30.333 \ldots } \right) \hfill \\
\end{gathered} \right.\]

\[\left( 2 \right)\,\,s = 4\]
\[\left( * \right)\,\,\,\,{\text{r/s}}\,\,\,{\text{division}}\,\,{\text{algorithm}}:\,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered}
\,r = qs + R\,\,\,\mathop = \limits^{s\,\, = \,\,4} \,\,\,4q + R \hfill \\
\,q\,\,\operatorname{int} \,\,\,,\,\,\,\,0\,\,\, \leqslant \,\,\,R\,\,\operatorname{int} \,\,\, \leqslant \,\,3\,\,\,\,\left( { = s - 1} \right) \hfill \\
\end{gathered} \right.\]
\[\frac{r}{s}\,\,\,\,\mathop = \limits^{\,\left( * \right)} \,\,\,\,\frac{{4q + R}}{4} = q + \frac{R}{4}\,\, = \,\,\operatorname{int} \,\, + \,\,\frac{R}{4}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\]
\[\frac{R}{4} = \,\,\,\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{\,\,\frac{0}{4}} \\
{\,\,\frac{1}{4}} \\
{\,\,\frac{2}{4}} \\
{\,\,\frac{3}{4}}
\end{array}} \right.\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{\,\,{\text{if}}\,\,\,R = 0\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left( {\frac{r}{4} = \operatorname{int} } \right)} \\
{\,\,{\text{if}}\,\,\,R = 1\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left( {\frac{r}{4} = \operatorname{int} \,\, + \,\,0.25} \right)} \\
{\,\,{\text{if}}\,\,\,R = 2\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left( {\frac{r}{4} = \operatorname{int} \,\, + \,\,0.5} \right)} \\
{\,\,{\text{if}}\,\,\,R = 3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left( {\frac{r}{4} = \operatorname{int} \,\, + \,\,0.75} \right)}
\end{array}\]

This solution follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.

Regards,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by swerve » Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:22 am
For a fraction to be terminating two conditions must satisfy:
1) numerator is an INTEGER.
2) denominator should be of form 2^x 5^y (x,y => integers which also includes 0).

now in this question
the denominator is 2^2 5^0
hence it satisfies.

Regards!
Join the discussion

swerve wrote:For a fraction to be terminating two conditions must satisfy:
1) numerator is an INTEGER.
2) denominator should be of form 2^x 5^y (x,y => integers which also includes 0).
Hi swerve!

What about 3/30 ? This number/fraction is terminating (=0.1) but it does not satisfy the conditions you have presented...

Do not forget that for the conditions above, first you must "simplify your fraction"... in other words:

Be sure numerator and denominator are relative prime, then you apply your "laws"!

Regards,
Fabio.

P.S.: curiously, integers x and y MAY be negative... but if so, we are not talking about "denominator", really... therefore I would prefer to add a nonnegative condition on x and y, in your second rule.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion