BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

another number properties with "remaining.."

Expert replies
by hwiya320 » Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:29 pm
The integer x is positive. What is the remainder when the x is divided by 14 ?

(1) The remainder when 4x is divided by 28 is 12.

(2) The remainder when x is divided by 21 is 3.

correct answer is E
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

hwiya320 wrote:The integer x is positive. What is the remainder when the x is divided by 14 ?

(1) The remainder when 4x is divided by 28 is 12.

(2) The remainder when x is divided by 21 is 3.

correct answer is E
Statement 1)

4x = 28a+12

x=7a+3 INSUF

Statement 2)

x=21b+3 INSUF

1+2)

X-3 = LCM(21:7)C

X-3=21C

X=21C+3

Insuf

24/14 = 10 as a remainder

43/14 = 1 as a remainder

Hence, E
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:50 pm
X-3 = LCM(21:7)C

X-3=21C
Nice approach. I just picked numbers till both matched.

Logitech, do u think we can do this if the remainders were different? I dint think so but let me know ur thoughts

For eg:

Stmt I left a remainder of 4 x=7a+4

Stmt II left a remainder of 3 x=21b+3
Join the discussion

by logitech » Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:01 pm
cramya wrote:
X-3 = LCM(21:7)C

X-3=21C
Nice approach. I just picked numbers till both matched.

Logitech, do u think we can do this if the remainders were different? I dint think so but let me know ur thoughts

For eg:

Stmt I left a remainder of 4 x=7a+4

Stmt II left a remainder of 3 x=21b+3
Nope, because we treat X-3 as a new number that can be divisible with both 21 and 7.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:58 am
I need a more detailed explanation. Can one of you pls elaborate. I dint understand how logitech concluded that 1 and 2 are independently insufficient (algebraically).

thanks a lot
Join the discussion

by logitech » Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:12 am
vittalgmat wrote:I need a more detailed explanation. Can one of you pls elaborate. I dint understand how logitech concluded that 1 and 2 are independently insufficient (algebraically).

thanks a lot
Statement 1)

x=7a+3

lets divide X with 14:

x /14 = ( a/2 + 3/14 )



as you see we do not always have an integer with different values of a.

lets say

X = 6b +3

is X divisible by 3 ?

x/3 = 2b+1

so every different value of B we will have an integer so IT IS DIVISIBLE
Last edited by logitech on Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:33 am, edited 2 times in total.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:26 am
logitech wrote:
vittalgmat wrote:I need a more detailed explanation. Can one of you pls elaborate. I dint understand how logitech concluded that 1 and 2 are independently insufficient (algebraically).

thanks a lot
Statement 1)

x=7a+3

lets divide X with 14:

x /14 = ( a/2 + 3/4 ) <--- should be (a/2 + 3/14)



Thanks for the explanation.

Join the discussion