a. considering r=1
x costing 200 units and y costing 100 units

seling x gives 200 units there by purchasing 2 more Y shares.
thus total 3 Y shares will give annual return of 6% = 1.06*300 = 318
original annual return of Y share = 1.06 * 100 = 106
thus increase % = (318-106)/106 * 100.

OA has to be A indeed.

Assume I have 100 stocks of each type (=r)

Cost of X = X
Cost of Y = Y

Hence,

100X + 100 Y = Total Invested

102X+106Y = Total after annual dividends



(1) Given, X = 2Y.

Therefore,

200Y + 100 Y = 300Y (Total Invested)

318 Y = Total after dividends.

From, this we can find % increase. Hence, SUFFICIENT

(2) Given, Y = 45

We dont know X and hence we cannot find how many stocks of X he sold to buy equivalent Y stocks. Not Sufficient.

A IMO

I think original annual yield for both X and Y needs to be considered.
X would have got him 204 and Y 106, so Total = 310.

Now he gets 318, so it shld be 318-310/310 IMO

amit2k9 wrote:a. considering r=1
x costing 200 units and y costing 100 units

seling x gives 200 units there by purchasing 2 more Y shares.
thus total 3 Y shares will give annual return of 6% = 1.06*300 = 318
original annual return of Y share = 1.06 * 100 = 106
thus increase % = (318-106)/106 * 100.

OA has to be A indeed.