An inference question is like a mini reading comp passage

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770
An inference question is like a mini reading comprehension passage

For most types of critical reasoning questions the specifics are very important, especially when it comes to the conclusion and the most important premise.

But for the inference question, focusing too much on the specifics as you are reading the stimulus can be a poor strategy. One reason for this is that inference question stems can be among the longer question stems of any critical reasoning type. More to read means more chances to get lost. Another reason is that because inference questions usually do not have a conclusion they do not have the inherent order of, for example, a good strengthening question. So that further increases the chances of getting lost in an inference stimulus. Finally, and most importantly, it is very difficult to accurately predict what the correct answer to an inference question will be.

Instead treat an inference as you would a reading comprehension passage. Focus on the scope of the stimulus and on what is being said in general. Just like in a reading comprehension passage if you need to check the specifics you can look back to the passage.

Then when you move to the answer choices you can focus on eliminating the 4 answer choices that COULD BE FALSE. Here are the 3 main ways that answers choices COULD BE FALSE:

1) Beyond the scope. So many inference choices are beyond the scope of the stimulus. This is by far the biggest category

2) Predictions. Predictions are future-oriented and the future is not something that "must be true."

3) Must be False. Some answer choices actually contradict what has been said.

Try the following question LSAT question and see if you can place the incorrect answer choices into the above categories. OA to follow.
  • 10. Twelve healthy volunteers with the Apo-A-IV-1 gene
    and twelve healthy volunteers who instead have the
    Apo-A-IV-2 gene each consumed a standard diet
    supplemented daily by a high-cholesterol food. A high
    level of cholesterol in the blood is associated with an
    increased risk of heart disease. After three weeks, the
    blood cholesterol levels of the subjects in the second
    group were unchanged, whereas the blood cholesterol
    levels of those with the Apo-A-IV-1 gene rose
    20 percent.

    Which one of the following is most strongly supported
    by the information above?

    (A) Approximately half the population carries a gene
    that lowers cholesterol levels.

    (B) Most of those at risk of heart disease may be able
    to reduce their risk by adopting a low-
    cholesterol diet.

    (C) The bodies of those who have the Apo-A-IV-2
    gene excrete cholesterol when blood cholesterol
    reaches a certain level.

    (D) The presence of the Apo-A-IV-1 gene seems to
    indicate that a person has a lower risk of heart
    disease.

    (E) The presence of the Apo-A-IV-2 gene may inhibit
    the elevation of blood cholesterol.
Source: December 1999 LSAT Test, Section 2, questions 10. I found the question in "The Next 10 Actual, Official PrepTests" LSAC, 2004 (p. 64).
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:27 am
Thanked: 3 times

by boazkhan » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:14 pm
Hi David,
Unless it's some sort of a trick question...I believe E is the answer.

Legendary Member
Posts: 586
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by rohu27 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:53 am
David@VeritasPrep wrote:An inference question is like a mini reading comprehension passage


1) Beyond the scope. So many inference choices are beyond the scope of the stimulus. This is by far the biggest category

2) Predictions. Predictions are future-oriented and the future is not something that "must be true."

3) Must be False. Some answer choices actually contradict what has been said.

Try the following question LSAT question and see if you can place the incorrect answer choices into the above categories. OA to follow.
  • 10. Twelve healthy volunteers with the Apo-A-IV-1 gene
    and twelve healthy volunteers who instead have the
    Apo-A-IV-2 gene each consumed a standard diet
    supplemented daily by a high-cholesterol food. A high
    level of cholesterol in the blood is associated with an
    increased risk of heart disease. After three weeks, the
    blood cholesterol levels of the subjects in the second
    group were unchanged, whereas the blood cholesterol
    levels of those with the Apo-A-IV-1 gene rose
    20 percent.

    Which one of the following is most strongly supported
    by the information above?

    (A) Approximately half the population carries a gene
    that lowers cholesterol levels.

    Beyond the scope

    (B) Most of those at risk of heart disease may be able
    to reduce their risk by adopting a low-
    cholesterol diet.

    Predictions
    (C) The bodies of those who have the Apo-A-IV-2
    gene excrete cholesterol when blood cholesterol
    reaches a certain level.
    Must be False

    (D) The presence of the Apo-A-IV-1 gene seems to
    indicate that a person has a lower risk of heart
    disease.
    Must be False

    (E) The presence of the Apo-A-IV-2 gene may inhibit
    the elevation of blood cholesterol.
    this is only statment supported by the findings of the study:
    After three weeks, the
    blood cholesterol levels of the subjects in the second
    group were unchanged, whereas the blood cholesterol
    levels of those with the Apo-A-IV-1 gene rose
    20 percent.
Source: December 1999 LSAT Test, Section 2, questions 10. I found the question in "The Next 10 Actual, Official PrepTests" LSAC, 2004 (p. 64).

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 110
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:52 am
Thanked: 3 times

by M09 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:21 am
David@VeritasPrep wrote:An inference question is like a mini reading comprehension passage

For most types of critical reasoning questions the specifics are very important, especially when it comes to the conclusion and the most important premise.

But for the inference question, focusing too much on the specifics as you are reading the stimulus can be a poor strategy. One reason for this is that inference question stems can be among the longer question stems of any critical reasoning type. More to read means more chances to get lost. Another reason is that because inference questions usually do not have a conclusion they do not have the inherent order of, for example, a good strengthening question. So that further increases the chances of getting lost in an inference stimulus. Finally, and most importantly, it is very difficult to accurately predict what the correct answer to an inference question will be.

Instead treat an inference as you would a reading comprehension passage. Focus on the scope of the stimulus and on what is being said in general. Just like in a reading comprehension passage if you need to check the specifics you can look back to the passage.

Then when you move to the answer choices you can focus on eliminating the 4 answer choices that COULD BE FALSE. Here are the 3 main ways that answers choices COULD BE FALSE:

1) Beyond the scope. So many inference choices are beyond the scope of the stimulus. This is by far the biggest category

2) Predictions. Predictions are future-oriented and the future is not something that "must be true."

3) Must be False. Some answer choices actually contradict what has been said.

Try the following question LSAT question and see if you can place the incorrect answer choices into the above categories. OA to follow.
  • 10. Twelve healthy volunteers with the Apo-A-IV-1 gene
    and twelve healthy volunteers who instead have the
    Apo-A-IV-2 gene each consumed a standard diet
    supplemented daily by a high-cholesterol food. A high
    level of cholesterol in the blood is associated with an
    increased risk of heart disease. After three weeks, the
    blood cholesterol levels of the subjects in the second
    group were unchanged, whereas the blood cholesterol
    levels of those with the Apo-A-IV-1 gene rose
    20 percent.

    Which one of the following is most strongly supported
    by the information above?

    (A) Approximately half the population carries a gene
    that lowers cholesterol levels.

    (B) Most of those at risk of heart disease may be able
    to reduce their risk by adopting a low-
    cholesterol diet.

    (C) The bodies of those who have the Apo-A-IV-2
    gene excrete cholesterol when blood cholesterol
    reaches a certain level.

    (D) The presence of the Apo-A-IV-1 gene seems to
    indicate that a person has a lower risk of heart
    disease.

    (E) The presence of the Apo-A-IV-2 gene may inhibit
    the elevation of blood cholesterol.
Source: December 1999 LSAT Test, Section 2, questions 10. I found the question in "The Next 10 Actual, Official PrepTests" LSAC, 2004 (p. 64).

I was between C & E. Finally opted for E

(E) The presence of the Apo-A-IV-2 gene may inhibit
the elevation of blood cholesterol.

Had this option been like this "The presence of the Apo-A-IV-2 gene inhibit the elevation of blood cholesterol."
I'd have rejected this one.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 436
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:07 am
Thanked: 72 times
Followed by:6 members

by manpsingh87 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:33 am
David@VeritasPrep wrote:An inference question is like a mini reading comprehension passage

For most types of critical reasoning questions the specifics are very important, especially when it comes to the conclusion and the most important premise.

But for the inference question, focusing too much on the specifics as you are reading the stimulus can be a poor strategy. One reason for this is that inference question stems can be among the longer question stems of any critical reasoning type. More to read means more chances to get lost. Another reason is that because inference questions usually do not have a conclusion they do not have the inherent order of, for example, a good strengthening question. So that further increases the chances of getting lost in an inference stimulus. Finally, and most importantly, it is very difficult to accurately predict what the correct answer to an inference question will be.

Instead treat an inference as you would a reading comprehension passage. Focus on the scope of the stimulus and on what is being said in general. Just like in a reading comprehension passage if you need to check the specifics you can look back to the passage.

Then when you move to the answer choices you can focus on eliminating the 4 answer choices that COULD BE FALSE. Here are the 3 main ways that answers choices COULD BE FALSE:

1) Beyond the scope. So many inference choices are beyond the scope of the stimulus. This is by far the biggest category

2) Predictions. Predictions are future-oriented and the future is not something that "must be true."

3) Must be False. Some answer choices actually contradict what has been said.

Try the following question LSAT question and see if you can place the incorrect answer choices into the above categories. OA to follow.
  • 10. Twelve healthy volunteers with the Apo-A-IV-1 gene
    and twelve healthy volunteers who instead have the
    Apo-A-IV-2 gene each consumed a standard diet
    supplemented daily by a high-cholesterol food. A high
    level of cholesterol in the blood is associated with an
    increased risk of heart disease. After three weeks, the
    blood cholesterol levels of the subjects in the second
    group were unchanged, whereas the blood cholesterol
    levels of those with the Apo-A-IV-1 gene rose
    20 percent.

    Which one of the following is most strongly supported
    by the information above?

    (A) Approximately half the population carries a gene
    that lowers cholesterol levels.

    (B) Most of those at risk of heart disease may be able
    to reduce their risk by adopting a low-
    cholesterol diet.

    (C) The bodies of those who have the Apo-A-IV-2
    gene excrete cholesterol when blood cholesterol
    reaches a certain level.

    (D) The presence of the Apo-A-IV-1 gene seems to
    indicate that a person has a lower risk of heart
    disease.

    (E) The presence of the Apo-A-IV-2 gene may inhibit
    the elevation of blood cholesterol.
Source: December 1999 LSAT Test, Section 2, questions 10. I found the question in "The Next 10 Actual, Official PrepTests" LSAC, 2004 (p. 64).
A) Prediction.
B)Prediction.
C)Beyond the scope.
D)Must Be False.
E)Spot on Correct.
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:29 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

by crimson2283 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 9:29 am
IMO E

Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

by maihuna » Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:29 am
David@VeritasPrep wrote:An inference question is like a mini reading comprehension passage


(A) Approximately half the population carries a gene that lowers cholesterol levels.

False : A sample of 12 from each group doesn't mean they equally represents the whole population.

(B) Most of those at risk of heart disease may be able to reduce their risk by adopting a low-cholesterol diet.
False : May be true in actual world, but here we are only told what happens to different gene people for cholesterol rich food.

(C) The bodies of those who have the Apo-A-IV-2 gene excrete cholesterol when blood cholesterol reaches a certain level.
False : Could be, but who knows, cholesterol is excreted or converted? We only knows it doesn't increased.

(D) The presence of the Apo-A-IV-1 gene seems to indicate that a person has a lower risk of heart disease.
False : Exactly opposite, if these arguments are any hints iy is actually opposite.
(E) The presence of the Apo-A-IV-2 gene may inhibit the elevation of blood cholesterol.
TRUE: Yes may be, just may be.
[/list]Source: December 1999 LSAT Test, Section 2, questions 10. I found the question in "The Next 10 Actual, Official PrepTests" LSAC, 2004 (p. 64).
Charged up again to beat the beast :)

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:31 am
OA is E.

You guys are right on.

No trick here. This was more about the process that just the answer.

You did very well with the process!

Here is how I would label the 4 incorrect choices.

A) I would say that this is beyond the scope because we simply do not know what the breakdown is in the population. It could also be said to be a prediction if you think of it as we will discover that 50% of the population has this.

B) This seems like a prediction. Do we know they will be able to reduce? It is also out of scope we do not know about a low cholesterol diet.

C) Out of scope - do we know what the mechanisms at work are here?

D) Must be False!! It actually seems that the Apo - 1 gene means a higher risk.

E) Correct answer. M09 You are right, the fact that choice E allows for some flexibility makes it easier for that choice to be correct.

Let me give you a tougher one and have you apply the same categories - I will post that question here in this thread later today.

Nice Job!
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 436
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:07 am
Thanked: 72 times
Followed by:6 members

by manpsingh87 » Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:50 am
Hi david thanks for a such a wonderful question and an equally good explanation, please post some more questions...!!
David@VeritasPrep wrote:OA is E.

You guys are right on.

No trick here. This was more about the process that just the answer.

You did very well with the process!

Here is how I would label the 4 incorrect choices.

A) I would say that this is beyond the scope because we simply do not know what the breakdown is in the population. It could also be said to be a prediction if you think of it as we will discover that 50% of the population has this.

B) This seems like a prediction. Do we know they will be able to reduce? It is also out of scope we do not know about a low cholesterol diet.

C) Out of scope - do we know what the mechanisms at work are here?

D) Must be False!! It actually seems that the Apo - 1 gene means a higher risk.

E) Correct answer. M09 You are right, the fact that choice E allows for some flexibility makes it easier for that choice to be correct.

Let me give you a tougher one and have you apply the same categories - I will post that question here in this thread later today.

Nice Job!
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:30 pm
Here is another one for you to try! Same thing, which categories do the wrong answers fall into?

Source: June 2001 LSAT Test, Section 1, question 19. I found the question in "The Next 10 Actual, Official PrepTests" LSAC, 2004 (p. 191).

"19. People should avoid taking the antacid calcium
carbonate in doses larger than half a gram, for despite its
capacity to neutralize stomach acids, calcium carbonate
can increase the calcium level in the blood and thus
impair kidney function. Moreover, just half a gram of it
can stimulate the production of gastrin, a stomach
hormone that triggers acid secretion.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported
by the information above?

(A) Cessation of gastrin production is a more
effective method of controlling excess stomach
acid than is direct neutralization of stomach acid.

(B) People who avoid taking more than half a gram of
calcium carbonate are less likely than average to
suffer from impaired kidney function.

(C) Doses of calcium carbonate smaller than half a
gram can reduce stomach acid more effectively
than much larger doses do.

(D) Half a gram of calcium carbonate can causally
contribute to both the secretion and the
neutralization of stomach acids.

(E) Impaired kidney function may increase the level
of calcium in the blood.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

by maihuna » Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:50 pm
D it is :

calcium carbonate can neutralize stomach acid, but just half gram can produce gastrin that triggers stomach acid. And so half a gram can do the same for which it is being used to neutralize.

===================================
(D) Half a gram of calcium carbonate can causally
contribute to both the secretion and the
neutralization of stomach acids.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 436
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:07 am
Thanked: 72 times
Followed by:6 members

by manpsingh87 » Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:28 pm
David@VeritasPrep wrote:Here is another one for you to try! Same thing, which categories do the wrong answers fall into?

Source: June 2001 LSAT Test, Section 1, question 19. I found the question in "The Next 10 Actual, Official PrepTests" LSAC, 2004 (p. 191).

"19. People should avoid taking the antacid calcium
carbonate in doses larger than half a gram, for despite its
capacity to neutralize stomach acids, calcium carbonate
can increase the calcium level in the blood and thus
impair kidney function. Moreover, just half a gram of it
can stimulate the production of gastrin, a stomach
hormone that triggers acid secretion.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported
by the information above?

(A) Cessation of gastrin production is a more
effective method of controlling excess stomach
acid than is direct neutralization of stomach acid.

(B) People who avoid taking more than half a gram of
calcium carbonate are less likely than average to
suffer from impaired kidney function.

(C) Doses of calcium carbonate smaller than half a
gram can reduce stomach acid more effectively
than much larger doses do.

(D) Half a gram of calcium carbonate can causally
contribute to both the secretion and the
neutralization of stomach acids.

(E) Impaired kidney function may increase the level
of calcium in the blood.
My take.
A) Out of Scope/Must be false.
B) Prediction. There might be some other way of getting impaired kidneys apart from taking high doses of calcium carbonate.
C) Prediction. Large doses can prove equally good as small doses in neutralizing stomach acids.
D) Correct.
E) Out of scope. We know that A causes B, but we can't say with surety that B will Cause A as well
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:13 am
OA is D.

Nice work Manpsingh! That is a very nice use of the three categories to eliminate 4 answers that Could Be False.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

by maihuna » Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:35 am
Do u want to follow the rigid steps suggested by you? In fact I found them totally useless to consider a change in approach.
David@VeritasPrep wrote:OA is D.

Nice work Manpsingh! That is a very nice use of the three categories to eliminate 4 answers that Could Be False.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Tue Feb 22, 2011 10:16 am
I love that comment!!

This is a large forum that includes many, many suggestions. No doubt every single technique suggested is considered unnecessary by someone. They don't always say it, which is why I love truly do appreciate your comment.

I can only say what I have said to everyone I have worked with -- you will be taking the exam, so do what works for you.

I have had many people benefit from focusing on those three categories. But, if you are already doing well on these types of questions why would you change your approach? I certainly do not change my approach every time I read something, but some things do make sense even after so many years with the GMAT. So I am going to keep reading and learning and even if most of what I read does not change what I do - something will.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course