BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Ambiguous SC

Expert replies
by yvonne0923 » Thu May 12, 2011 11:28 am
Although modern science has essentially eradicated the bubonic plague from the industrialized word, the occasional patient should be diagnosed every few years with the disease.

A. the occasional patient should be diagnosed every few years with the disease
B. an occasional patient should be diagnosed with the disease once in every few years
C. the disease will be diagnosed in the occasional patient once in every few years
D. every few years the occasional patient will be diagnosed with the disease
E. every few years the occasional patient should be diagnosed with the disease


















___________________________________________________________________________________________________
I chose C instead of D, why I cannot use" the disease will be diagnosed" here?

Answer:D
Last edited by yvonne0923 on Thu May 12, 2011 12:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by uwhusky » Thu May 12, 2011 12:34 pm
The incorrect usage of "should" is sufficient to eliminate all but C and D.

However, I am not quite clear on your question.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by yvonne0923 » Thu May 12, 2011 12:43 pm
uwhusky wrote:The incorrect usage of "should" is sufficient to eliminate all but C and D.

However, I am not quite clear on your question.
I am sorry that I might confused you, my question is why C doesn't work here? Why can't I use" the disease will be diagnosed" here?
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Thu May 12, 2011 12:50 pm
C is very wordy and awkward.

You can't really tell which one below is the intended meaning of C, and even if you could, it is still awkward to understand.

"the disease will be diagnosed in the occasional patient once in every few years"

"the disease will be diagnosed in the occasional patient once in every few years"
Yep.
Join the discussion

by smackmartine » Thu May 12, 2011 2:59 pm
Whats diagnosed the disease or the Patient?? of coz "the Patient" so C is out.

E is a general idea, while D is the actual plan.

D clarifies the contradiction to what is mentioned in the dependent sentence.

So D
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Thu May 12, 2011 10:34 pm
Hi uwhusky,

Can you elaborate this?
The incorrect usage of "should" is sufficient
and share some knowledge on usage of should?
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Fri May 13, 2011 2:07 am
Nevermind what I said earlier, I confused usage of should in CR with SC.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Sun May 15, 2011 4:30 pm
SHOULD wouldn't make sense here because it expresses obligation -- as if doctors have some (strange) responsibility to diagnose somebody with bubonic plague according to a schedule.
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Sun May 15, 2011 9:43 pm
Thanks Jim for responding.

Could you please explain this with the help of some examples.

I understood that, should conveys some kind of binding on the doctor.
occasional patient should be diagnosed ..
Why can't we interpret that the aim of diagnosis (synonymus to should) is to find the disease?
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Thu May 19, 2011 4:39 am
The best way to solve this is by replacing 'diagnosed' with 'found'

A: We are trying to convey that there is still a rare patient found with plague, not to discuss about the mandatory treatment to him
C: "disease will be found in occasional patient" -If you are irregular to hospital then you have plague

D: every few years an occasional patient was found having plague.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Thu May 19, 2011 8:52 am
bubbliiiiiiii wrote:Thanks Jim for responding.

Could you please explain this with the help of some examples.

I understood that, should conveys some kind of binding on the doctor.
occasional patient should be diagnosed ..
Why can't we interpret that the aim of diagnosis (synonymus to should) is to find the disease?
This might sound like kind of a small difference, but the point of diagnosis is not to find the disease, but to look for it -- to determine whether it is present. If I think I hear a noise outside my window, I go to the window to see whether there is something there, not in order to find something there -- do you see the difference?
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1