Although some parents believe that the local all-girls school should begin to admit boys, others claim that girls would participate actively in class only if they had all-girls.
B. that girls will only participate actively in a class if it is all-girls
C. that girls will only participate actively in an all-girls class
D. that girls would participate actively only in a class that were all-girls
E. that girls in all-girls classes will participate actively in that situation only
All-girls School
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:05 pm
- Location: Ohio, US
- Thanked: 6 times
IMO D
Would refers to future tense of a condition of an all girls class.
Would refers to future tense of a condition of an all girls class.
Its better to burn out than to fade away
I was thinking the same thing, but I don't believe that the use of "were" is grammatical in D.blackarrow wrote:IMO D
Would refers to future tense of a condition of an all girls class.
D. that girls would participate actively only in a class that were all-girls
I believe the correct clause should read:
"...that girls would participate actively only in a class that is all-girls."
Thus, I picked C by default.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am
- ashish1354
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 9:52 am
- Thanked: 4 times
can some one explain the switch in the position of only in the correct answer
participate actively in class only if they had all-girls classes (limits the situation for all girls classes)
that girls will only participate actively in an all-girls class. (limits participation)
i need to understand how can the above two options convey the same meaning.
participate actively in class only if they had all-girls classes (limits the situation for all girls classes)
that girls will only participate actively in an all-girls class. (limits participation)
i need to understand how can the above two options convey the same meaning.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:59 pm
- Thanked: 8 times
would is a subjunctive ..it describes situations contrary to reality... or thing that wont really happen.
where as....girls WILL participate is a for real ....
hmm:
WILL: the event has not yet occured.. hence you are talking as if the event will be TRUE.. (Future tense)
If i WIN the lottery, i will quit my job..
WOULD: the event has already occurred ...... and the event is FALSE (not winning)
If i HAD won the lottery, i WOULD have quit.
just search the forums..you will find some good explanations..
where as....girls WILL participate is a for real ....
hmm:
WILL: the event has not yet occured.. hence you are talking as if the event will be TRUE.. (Future tense)
If i WIN the lottery, i will quit my job..
WOULD: the event has already occurred ...... and the event is FALSE (not winning)
If i HAD won the lottery, i WOULD have quit.
just search the forums..you will find some good explanations..