BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at differe

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Fri Oct 12, 2018 7:06 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at different constant rates. Alice, working alone, can complete the task in 21 hours. Is Alice's rate the slowest rate?

(1) Barbara, working alone, can complete the task in 14 hours, and Barbara and Cynia working together can complete the task in approximately 86% of the time taken by Alice and Cynia working together to complete the task.
(2) Barbara and Cynia can complete the task in approximately 71% of the time taken for Alice and Barbara to complete the task.

OA A

Source: Princeton Review
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

BTGmoderatorDC wrote:Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at different constant rates. Alice, working alone, can complete the task in 21 hours. Is Alice's rate the slowest rate?

(1) Barbara, working alone, can complete the task in 14 hours, and Barbara and Cynia working together can complete the task in approximately 86% of the time taken by Alice and Cynia working together to complete the task.
(2) Barbara and Cynia can complete the task in approximately 71% of the time taken for Alice and Barbara to complete the task.

OA A

Source: Princeton Review
We have to determine which one of the three Alice Barbara, and Cynia is the slowest.

Let's take each statement one by one.

(1) Barbara, working alone, can complete the task in 14 hours, and Barbara and Cynia working together can complete the task in approximately 86% of the time taken by Alice and Cynia working together to complete the task.

Given Alice, working alone, can complete the task in 21 hours and Barbara, working alone, can complete the task in 14 hours, it is clear that Barbara is not the slowest. So, the answer is between Alice and Cynia.

We know that Alice's rate = 1/21 and Barbara's rate = 1/14. At these values, Barbara's rate = [(1/21) / (1/14)]*100% = (14/21)*100% = (2/3)*100% = 66.66% of Alice's rate

From the statement, we know that Barbara and Cynia working together can complete the task in approximately 86% of the time taken by Alice and Cynia working together to complete the task.

When Barbara teams up with Cynia and Alice teams up with Cynia, Barbara and Cynia together Vs. Alice and Cynia (86% > 66.66%) is not as efficient as Barbara alone Vs. Alice alone (66.6%).

Let's understand this better.

Let's assume that the rates of Alice and Cynic are equal, then Barbara and Cynia working together SHOULD complete the task in [spoiler]86%[/spoiler] 66.66% of the time taken by Alice and Cynia working together.

However,actuals not so, the actual figure is 86% > 66.67%. It implies that the rate of Cynia must be less than that of Alice.

Thus, Cynia is the slowest. Sufficient.

(2) Barbara and Cynia can complete the task in approximately 71% of the time taken for Alice and Barbara to complete the task.

There are three variable rates of Alice, Barbara and Cynia and we know the rate of only Alice, thus, we cannot compare the values.Isufficient.

The correct answer: A

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: New York | Hyderabad | Mexico City | Toronto | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Last edited by Jay@ManhattanReview on Sat Oct 13, 2018 5:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Oct 13, 2018 5:56 am
BTGmoderatorDC wrote:Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at different constant rates. Alice, working alone, can complete the task in 21 hours. Is Alice's rate the slowest rate?

(1) Barbara, working alone, can complete the task in 14 hours, and Barbara and Cynia working together can complete the task in approximately 86% of the time taken by Alice and Cynia working together to complete the task.
(2) Barbara and Cynia can complete the task in approximately 71% of the time taken for Alice and Barbara to complete the task.
TIME and RATE have a reciprocal relationship.

Statement 1:
The time ratio for Barbara and Alice = (14 hours)/(21 hours).
The rate ratio for Barbara and Alice is equal to the reciprocal of the time ratio:
(B's rate)/(A's rate) = 21/14 = 3/2.
Let B = 3 units per hour and A = 2 units per hour.

Barbara and Cynia working together can complete the task in approximately 86% of the time taken by Alice and Cynia working together to complete the task.
The time ratio for B+C and A+C = 86/100 = 43/50.
The rate ratio for B+C and A+C is equal to the reciprocal of the time ratio:
(B+C)/(A+C) = 50/43.
Plugging B=3 and A=2 into the equation above, we get:
(3+C)/(2+C) = 50/43.
Since we can solve for C, we can determine whether Alice has the lowest rate.
SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2:
The time ratio for B+C and B+A= 71/100.
The rate ratio for B+C and B+A is equal to the reciprocal of the time ratio:
(B+C)/(B+A) = 100/71.
Implication:
B+C > B+A
C>A.
No way to determine whether Alice is slower than Barbara.
INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is A.

Complete solution for Statement 1:
(3+C)/(2+C) = 50/43
129 + 43C = 100 + 50C
29 = 7C
C = 29/7 = 4 1/7.
Since A=2, B=3 and C = 4 1/7, A's rate is the lowest.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

BTGmoderatorDC wrote:Alice, Barbara, and Cynia work on identical tasks at different constant rates. Alice, working alone, can complete the task in 21 hours. Is Alice's rate the slowest rate?

(1) Barbara, working alone, can complete the task in 14 hours, and Barbara and Cynia working together can complete the task in approximately 86% of the time taken by Alice and Cynia working together to complete the task.
(2) Barbara and Cynia can complete the task in approximately 71% of the time taken for Alice and Barbara to complete the task.
Source: Princeton Review
Obs.: the term approximately invalidates the question because we know NOTHING about the approximation precision.
(What should be considered "near" 86%, for instance?)
We will consider equality in both cases, with the following (not problematic) aside: the numbers b and c (below) may be non-integers.

Let´s imagine the task is defined by 42 identical units of job (from now on simply "units").

Alice (A) can do 2 units/h (therefore in 21h she will do 2*21 = 42 units, i.e., the task).
Barbara (B) can do (say) b units/h
Cynia (C) can do (say) c units/h
$$2\,\,\mathop < \limits^? \,\,\,\min \left( {b,c} \right)$$
$$\left( 1 \right)\,\,\left\{ \matrix{
b = 3 \hfill \cr
\,{{{T_{B \cup C}}} \over {{T_{A \cup C}}}} = {{43} \over {50}}\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{W = \,{\rm{work}}\,{\rm{rate}}} \,\,\,\,\,{{3 + c} \over {2 + c}} = {{{W_{B \cup C}}} \over {{W_{A \cup C}}}} = {{50} \over {43}} \hfill \cr} \right.$$
$${{3 + c} \over {2 + c}} = {{50} \over {43}}\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,c\,\,{\rm{unique}}\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,{\rm{SUFF}}.$$
$$\left( 2 \right)\,\,\,{{{T_{B \cup C}}} \over {{T_{A \cup B}}}} = {{71} \over {100}}\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{W = \,{\rm{work}}\,{\rm{rate}}} \,\,\,\,\,{{b + c} \over {2 + b}} = {{100} \over {71}}$$
$$\left\{ \matrix{
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {b;c} \right) = \left( {1;{{300} \over {71}} - 1} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{NO}}} \right\rangle \hfill \cr
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {b;c} \right) = \left( {3;{{500} \over {71}} - 3} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle \hfill \cr} \right.$$

This solution follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.

Regards,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion