BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Acme Computer

Expert replies
by confused13 » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:28 am
In 2003 Acme Computer's price for each of its computers was five times the price for each of its printers. What was the ratio of its gross revenue from computers to its gross revenue from printers in 2003?

(1) In the first half of 2003, Acme sold computers and printers in a ratio of 3:2; in the second half of 2003, Acme sold computers and printers in the ratio of 2:1.

(2) Acme's 2003 price for each of its computers was $1,000.

OA: E
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by confused13 » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:31 am
I understand why B is out.

What I don't understand is the following:

Wanted: revenue computers/revenue printers = #computers x price computers / #printers x price printers = # computers x 5 /# printers.

Why is statement 1 insufficient? This statement tells us the ratio of numbers sold, which should be sufficient?!
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:01 am
In 2003 Acme Computer's price for each of its computers was five times the price for each of its printers. What was the ratio of its gross revenue from computers to its gross revenue from printers in 2003?

(1) In the first half of 2003, Acme sold computers and printers in a ratio of 3:2; in the second half of 2003, Acme sold computers and printers in the ratio of 2:1.

(2) Acme's 2003 price for each of its computers was $1000.
Plug in different combinations that satisfy both statements.

Statement 2 states that the computer price = 1000.
Since the computer price is 5 times the printer price, the printer price = 200.

Case 1:
First half of the year:
3 computers sold = 3*1000 = 3000.
2 printers sold = 2*200 = 400.

Second half of the year:
2 computers sold = 2*1000 = 2000.
1 printer sold = 1*200 = 200.

Computer revenue/Printer revenue = (3000+2000)/(400+200) = 5000/600 = 25/3.

Case 2:
Try to get a DIFFERENT RATIO.

Change the values for the first half of the year:
6 computers sold = 6*1000 = 6000.
4 printers sold = 4*200 = 800.

Don't change the values for the second half of the year:
2 computers sold = 2*1000 = 2000.
1 printer sold = 1*200 = 200.

Computer revenue/Printer revenue = (6000+2000)/(800+200) = 8000/1000 = 8.

Since the ratio can be different values, the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by hemant_rajput » Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:39 am
we have to find C/P ratio.

Here C signifies revenue from computers sale
and P signifies revenue from Printers sale

say
cost of 1 comp is a
cost of 1 printer is b

1

first half the sold comp and printer in 3:2

so revenue for 1st half would be (3na)/(2nb)

Second half the sold comp and printer in 2:1

so revenue for 2nd half would be (2ma)/(1mb)


C/P = (3na + 2ma)/ (2nb + 1mb)

as we don't know n,m,a and b we can't tell the ratio of C/P

2. knowing the cost of Comp will not help as we can see from above equation.


combining two we still have 3 variables unknown - n,m and b. hence can't answer.

E is the correct answer.
here m and n are factor to get the actual no. of computer and printer sold in respective half
I'm no expert, just trying to work on my skills. If I've made any mistakes please bear with me.
Join the discussion