Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

|Absolute Value| tutorial Issue

Expert replies
by batbond007 » Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:22 am
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2009/09/ ... ute-values

Who else sees a problem with the below problem.

What is x? (Data Sufficiency)

(1) | x | < 2

(2) | x | = 3x - 2


As discussed above, AV equations give 2 solutions and AV inequalities give 2 endpoints of ranges. In this sense, we know that neither Statement (1) nor Statement (2) is sufficient, right? Not so fast.

Statement (1) gives us a range, and tells us that -2 < x < 2.
Per strategy above, we can split Statement (2) into the following two equations:
x = 3x -2, and

-x = 3x - 2

x =1

x = 1/2


It seems that even with (1) and (2) TOGETHER, we still would not know whether x = 1 or x = 1/2. However, these questions emphasize the need of plugging back into the original equation to check your answer.

If we were to plug in x = 1/2 into | x | = 3x - 2, we would get 1/2 = -1/2, which is NOT true. Since this solution cannot exist, only x = 1 is our solution. Answer Choice (B).

I am lost as to why the hell do we even need to calculate the second equation if we are going to reject the solution found from it. What is the right way of solving the problem ? Do we ignore the second equation when there is a variable on both sides of the equation ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by quantfunda » Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:23 pm
Well, The solution given above is the correct way to proceed.

As you are saying why we need to find the solution when we reject it. Its not like we are finding the solution and rejecting it. Its the whole process to find the valid solution.

So 2nd statement gives only one valid solution and the only way to find it , is to solve the equation and then validate the solution thus found, back into equation.
Join the discussion