BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

|Absolute Value| tutorial Issue

Expert replies
by batbond007 » Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:22 am
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2009/09/ ... ute-values

Who else sees a problem with the below problem.

What is x? (Data Sufficiency)

(1) | x | < 2

(2) | x | = 3x - 2


As discussed above, AV equations give 2 solutions and AV inequalities give 2 endpoints of ranges. In this sense, we know that neither Statement (1) nor Statement (2) is sufficient, right? Not so fast.

Statement (1) gives us a range, and tells us that -2 < x < 2.
Per strategy above, we can split Statement (2) into the following two equations:
x = 3x -2, and

-x = 3x - 2

x =1

x = 1/2


It seems that even with (1) and (2) TOGETHER, we still would not know whether x = 1 or x = 1/2. However, these questions emphasize the need of plugging back into the original equation to check your answer.

If we were to plug in x = 1/2 into | x | = 3x - 2, we would get 1/2 = -1/2, which is NOT true. Since this solution cannot exist, only x = 1 is our solution. Answer Choice (B).

I am lost as to why the hell do we even need to calculate the second equation if we are going to reject the solution found from it. What is the right way of solving the problem ? Do we ignore the second equation when there is a variable on both sides of the equation ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by quantfunda » Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:23 pm
Well, The solution given above is the correct way to proceed.

As you are saying why we need to find the solution when we reject it. Its not like we are finding the solution and rejecting it. Its the whole process to find the valid solution.

So 2nd statement gives only one valid solution and the only way to find it , is to solve the equation and then validate the solution thus found, back into equation.
Join the discussion