Absolute value

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:07 am
Thanked: 2 times

Absolute value

by beater » Sun Sep 28, 2008 8:39 pm
Is |x|< 1?
(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
(2) |x - 3| &#8800; 0

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:26 am
Location: Accra, Ghana
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:720

C

by bbaah » Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:30 am
|x| < 1?

(1) |x+1| = 2|x-1|

|a| = a (if a >=0)

|a| = -a (if a<0)

Therefore,

Either x+1 = 2(x-1)
=> x=3

Or

x+1 = -2(x-1)
x+1 = -2x +2
x=1/3

Not Sufficient

(2) |x-3| != 0

If we set |x-3| = 3, we get x = 6, 0

Not Sufficient


Combining both statements

(1) => x = 3, or 1/3
(2) This statement eliminates the possibility that x = 3, leaving us with x = 1/3

Therefore |x| < 1

Sufficient

C.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:07 am
Thanked: 2 times

by beater » Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:06 am
Hi bbaah - what promted you to do this step:

'If we set |x-3| = 3, we get x = 6, 0'

Anyone with a different approach to this problem?

Thanks!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:26 am
Location: Accra, Ghana
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:720

x = 6, 0

by bbaah » Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:22 am
I was just trying to find a situation in which statement given will yield different results. If we can find such a situation, then the question cannot be answered on the basis of the information given.

Since we were only told that |x-3| !=0, we can set |x-3| = any non zero number. I picked 3 because I realized numbers >=3 will yield different results. Try |x-3| = 4,5,6...

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:07 am
Thanked: 2 times

by beater » Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:11 am
Thanks bbah.

Anyone with a different approach?

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 316
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:04 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: Absolute value

by Morgoth » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:49 pm
beater wrote:Is |x|< 1?
(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
(2) |x - 3| &#8800; 0
Statement (1)

CaseI
|x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
-x - 1 = -2x + 2
2x - x = 2+1
x=3

CaseII
|x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
x+1 = 2x - 2
3 = x
x = 3

CaseIII
|x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
x+1 = -2x + 2
x=1/3

CaseIV
|x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
-x-1 = 2x-2
x=1/3

therefore x=3 or 1/3. Insufficient.

Statement (2)
|x - 3| &#8800; 0
This simply implies x cannot be 3.

Combining (1) & (2)
x=1/3. Sufficient.

Thus C is the answer.

This is a very long method, which I wouldnt recommend on the actual test, since it is not only very time consuming but also risky in terms of silly mistakes.

Try and go through Ian's posts. He has a very good number line approach for solving questions like this one.

Hope this helps.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 11:00 pm
Thanked: 4 times

Re: Absolute value

by nitin86 » Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:32 pm
Morgoth wrote:
beater wrote:Is |x|< 1?
(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
(2) |x - 3| &#8800; 0
Statement (1)

CaseI
|x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
-x - 1 = -2x + 2
2x - x = 2+1
x=3

CaseII
|x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
x+1 = 2x - 2
3 = x
x = 3

CaseIII
|x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
x+1 = -2x + 2
x=1/3

CaseIV
|x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
-x-1 = 2x-2
x=1/3

therefore x=3 or 1/3. Insufficient.

Statement (2)
|x - 3| &#8800; 0
This simply implies x cannot be 3.

Combining (1) & (2)
x=1/3. Sufficient.

Thus C is the answer.

This is a very long method, which I wouldnt recommend on the actual test, since it is not only very time consuming but also risky in terms of silly mistakes.

Try and go through Ian's posts. He has a very good number line approach for solving questions like this one.

Hope this helps.
CASE IV is not valid. This situation will never arrive since the range of value of x can be in this case.

x > 1
-1 < x < 1
x < -1

so, for case IV it cannot be that |x+1| => - (x+1) and 2|x-1| => 2(x-1), because if x < -1, then 2|x-1| => -2(x-1)

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 316
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:04 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: Absolute value

by Morgoth » Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:36 pm
nitin86 wrote: CASE IV is not valid. This situation will never arrive since the range of value of x can be in this case.

x > 1
-1 < x < 1
x < -1

so, for case IV it cannot be that |x+1| => - (x+1) and 2|x-1| => 2(x-1), because if x < -1, then 2|x-1| => -2(x-1)
Agreed! nice spot.

Thanks.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 8:31 pm

Re: Absolute value

by hgupta0 » Thu Dec 04, 2008 3:09 pm
Can somebody confirm what the answer is for this?

Given the cases, it seems that x cannot be greater than -1 and cannot be less than 1. Hence, C? That is NO?

Thanks in advance.
Morgoth wrote:
nitin86 wrote: CASE IV is not valid. This situation will never arrive since the range of value of x can be in this case.

x > 1
-1 < x < 1
x < -1

so, for case IV it cannot be that |x+1| => - (x+1) and 2|x-1| => 2(x-1), because if x < -1, then 2|x-1| => -2(x-1)
Agreed! nice spot.

Thanks.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Thu Dec 04, 2008 3:59 pm
The answer is C). There's also a duplicate post for this.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Dec 05, 2008 3:09 am
statement (1)
for EQUATIONS involving absolute value, like this one, the key realization is that the absolute value of a quantity can signify either the quantity itself or the opposite of the quantity. therefore, if you try each of the sign combinations (pos/neg) of the absolute values in the problem, you'll be guaranteed to find all of the solutions.
(note: in what follows, "+" means leaving the expression within the absolute value bars alone; "-" means reversing the sign of that expression)
in this equation, there are ostensibly four sign combinations, +/+, +/-, -/+, -/-, but it's only necessary to try two of them:
** first, either +/+ or -/-, in which both or neither of the absolute value expressions are flipped. may as well go with +/+ (i.e., leaving both of the absolute value expressions alone while removing the bars): x + 1 = 2(x - 1), or x = 3. plugging this back into the original equation shows that it works.
** second, either +/- or -/+, in which one of the absolute value expressions is flipped. let's go (at random) with flipping the first one: -x - 1 = 2(x - 1), or x = 1/3. plugging this into the original equation also shows that it works.

therefore, statement 1 means that x = 3 or x = 1/3.

--

statement (2)

two ways to interpret absolute value inequalities like this one:
** memorize the template of the solution (preferred for efficiency's sake): you should just know that |expression| > a means "either expression > a or expression < -a".
** conceptualize absolute value as distance: in this case, |x - 3| means the distance between x and 3. therefore, this statement means that the distance between x and 3 is greater than 0 (in either direction).
either of these interpretations means that x < 3 or x > 3, or, equivalently, x is not equal to 3.

statement 1 is insufficient, because 1/3 gives a "yes" and 3 gives a "no". statement 2 is also insufficient, because every number except 3 is possible. taken together, though, the two statements are sufficient because they yield a unique value, 1/3, for x.
notice that there's no reason even to figure out whether 1/3 gives "yes" or "no" at this point; it's one value, meaning that it is guaranteed to be sufficient no matter what the answer.

answer = c
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron