BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

a proposal

Expert replies
by nafiul9090 » Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:49 am
A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers; the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are trimmed.

A) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are
B) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one once their horns are
C) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses once the animals' horns have been
D) if tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses once the animals' horns are
E) if tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one after the animals' horns have been

i am stuck between A and C my question is that whats wrong with option A
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by galaxian » Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:02 am
IMO Ambiguous 'their' should make us come down to Choice C
Join the discussion

by jonathan123456 » Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:58 am
idiom is "to see" not "and see" in this context
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:30 am
their is ambiguous in option A and thats why wrong
Join the discussion

by nafiul9090 » Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:59 am
aspirant2011 wrote:their is ambiguous in option A and thats why wrong
hi

is A wrong only for "their" but i think "their" refers to rhinos....or pronoun "their" cant refer to the animal???

regards nafi
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:14 am
nafiul9090 wrote:
aspirant2011 wrote:their is ambiguous in option A and thats why wrong
hi

is A wrong only for "their" but i think "their" refers to rhinos....or pronoun "their" cant refer to the animal???

regards nafi
In A their can refer to tourists also....
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:26 am
Hi,
I believe the problem with A is the intent. A says people do not visit parks and do not see rhinos as two distinct things . But, the purpose of the doubting is whether they will visit to see rhinos after the the removal of horns. I am not sure about the tense but 'have been' sounds better because those horns were removed before the time tourists visit them and they continue to be hornless.
Anyway, experts comments would be really appreciated!
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1