Sentence Correction

A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers; the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are trimmed.

A) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are
B) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one once their horns are
C) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses once the animals' horns have been
D) if tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses once the animals' horns are
E) if tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one after the animals' horns have been

i am stuck between A and C my question is that whats wrong with option A

IMO Ambiguous 'their' should make us come down to Choice C

idiom is "to see" not "and see" in this context

their is ambiguous in option A and thats why wrong

aspirant2011 wrote:their is ambiguous in option A and thats why wrong

hi

is A wrong only for "their" but i think "their" refers to rhinos....or pronoun "their" cant refer to the animal???

regards nafi

nafiul9090 wrote:

aspirant2011 wrote:their is ambiguous in option A and thats why wrong

hi

is A wrong only for "their" but i think "their" refers to rhinos....or pronoun "their" cant refer to the animal???

regards nafi

In A their can refer to tourists also....

Hi,
I believe the problem with A is the intent. A says people do not visit parks and do not see rhinos as two distinct things . But, the purpose of the doubting is whether they will visit to see rhinos after the the removal of horns. I am not sure about the tense but 'have been' sounds better because those horns were removed before the time tourists visit them and they continue to be hornless.
Anyway, experts comments would be really appreciated!