BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A MGMAT Inequality

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by liferocks » Mon May 10, 2010 9:40 pm
from 1
|x + 1| = 2|x - 1|

Hence x+1=2x-2 or x+1=2-2x

So x=3 or 1/3...not sufficient

from 2
|x - 3| > 0 ie (x-3)>0 or (x-3)<0
so x<-3 or x>3 ..... sufficient

Ans option B

can you please confirm with OA?
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by pkw209 » Mon May 10, 2010 9:58 pm
Hey liferocks-

Thanks for the response.

Official answer is actually C

The second statement should be x>3 or x<3 so inefficient. Together, you know that x can't be 3 (based on statement 2) so x=1/3, which is less than 1.

I might be going crazy but what's the rule for absolute value inequality questions?

I usually just take the positive and the negative of the left side of the equation.

i.e., for |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|

--> -(x+1) = 2(x-1) -->-x-1 = 2x-2 -->-3x = -1, x = 1/3

AND

--> x+1 = 2(x-1) -->x=3

Again, I'm probably going crazy but this is right, right?
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Mon May 10, 2010 10:50 pm
pkw209 wrote:Hey liferocks-

Thanks for the response.

Official answer is actually C

The second statement should be x>3 or x<3 so inefficient. Together, you know that x can't be 3 (based on statement 2) so x=1/3, which is less than 1.

I might be going crazy but what's the rule for absolute value inequality questions?

I usually just take the positive and the negative of the left side of the equation.

i.e., for |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|

--> -(x+1) = 2(x-1) -->-x-1 = 2x-2 -->-3x = -1, x = 1/3

AND

--> x+1 = 2(x-1) -->x=3

Again, I'm probably going crazy but this is right, right?
yup..you are absolutely right
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Mon May 10, 2010 11:04 pm
This is the way I used to work for Inequakities :

st 2 : |x - 3| > 0

case 1 :

x-3 >0

:x>3

Case 2: -(x-3)>0

-x+3>0

-x>-3

Now Multiply using -1 on both sides to remove the negative sign of X.

x<3.

So from above 2 cases, we have x> 3 or x<3. To cross check try some random values plugged into the equation.

ST 1:

U have nicely followed the steps.

Combining st1 & st2, we know that X can't be 3. SO X has to be less than 3. So we have to look out for the value. From St 1 we have X= 1/3.

|1/3| <1. Solved!!
Join the discussion

by pkw209 » Tue May 11, 2010 7:49 am
Thanks guys! :)
Join the discussion