from 1
|x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
Hence x+1=2x-2 or x+1=2-2x
So x=3 or 1/3...not sufficient
from 2
|x - 3| > 0 ie (x-3)>0 or (x-3)<0
so x<-3 or x>3 ..... sufficient
Ans option B
can you please confirm with OA?
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
A MGMAT Inequality
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
Hey liferocks-
Thanks for the response.
Official answer is actually C
The second statement should be x>3 or x<3 so inefficient. Together, you know that x can't be 3 (based on statement 2) so x=1/3, which is less than 1.
I might be going crazy but what's the rule for absolute value inequality questions?
I usually just take the positive and the negative of the left side of the equation.
i.e., for |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
--> -(x+1) = 2(x-1) -->-x-1 = 2x-2 -->-3x = -1, x = 1/3
AND
--> x+1 = 2(x-1) -->x=3
Again, I'm probably going crazy but this is right, right?
Thanks for the response.
Official answer is actually C
The second statement should be x>3 or x<3 so inefficient. Together, you know that x can't be 3 (based on statement 2) so x=1/3, which is less than 1.
I might be going crazy but what's the rule for absolute value inequality questions?
I usually just take the positive and the negative of the left side of the equation.
i.e., for |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
--> -(x+1) = 2(x-1) -->-x-1 = 2x-2 -->-3x = -1, x = 1/3
AND
--> x+1 = 2(x-1) -->x=3
Again, I'm probably going crazy but this is right, right?
yup..you are absolutely rightpkw209 wrote:Hey liferocks-
Thanks for the response.
Official answer is actually C
The second statement should be x>3 or x<3 so inefficient. Together, you know that x can't be 3 (based on statement 2) so x=1/3, which is less than 1.
I might be going crazy but what's the rule for absolute value inequality questions?
I usually just take the positive and the negative of the left side of the equation.
i.e., for |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
--> -(x+1) = 2(x-1) -->-x-1 = 2x-2 -->-3x = -1, x = 1/3
AND
--> x+1 = 2(x-1) -->x=3
Again, I'm probably going crazy but this is right, right?
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Lewis Carroll
This is the way I used to work for Inequakities :
st 2 : |x - 3| > 0
case 1 :
x-3 >0
>3
Case 2: -(x-3)>0
-x+3>0
-x>-3
Now Multiply using -1 on both sides to remove the negative sign of X.
x<3.
So from above 2 cases, we have x> 3 or x<3. To cross check try some random values plugged into the equation.
ST 1:
U have nicely followed the steps.
Combining st1 & st2, we know that X can't be 3. SO X has to be less than 3. So we have to look out for the value. From St 1 we have X= 1/3.
|1/3| <1. Solved!!
st 2 : |x - 3| > 0
case 1 :
x-3 >0
Case 2: -(x-3)>0
-x+3>0
-x>-3
Now Multiply using -1 on both sides to remove the negative sign of X.
x<3.
So from above 2 cases, we have x> 3 or x<3. To cross check try some random values plugged into the equation.
ST 1:
U have nicely followed the steps.
Combining st1 & st2, we know that X can't be 3. SO X has to be less than 3. So we have to look out for the value. From St 1 we have X= 1/3.
|1/3| <1. Solved!!
















