Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A cricketer trying to predict th

Expert replies
by AnuGmat » Wed Mar 02, 2016 8:28 pm
A cricketer trying to predict the outcome of the one day world cup match in 1996 between the experienced Pakistan and the upstart Bangladesh, probably would have chosen the then invincible Pakistan by an odds of 10/1 and been quite wrong

A. have chosen the then invincible Pakistan by an odds of 10/1 and been quite wrong
B. have chosen that it would be the then invincible Pakistan by an odds of 10/1 and be quite wrong
C. choose the then invincible Pakistan by an odds of 10/1 and been quite wrong
D. choose the then invincible Pakistan by an odds of 10/1 and be quite wrong
E. choose in favor of the then invincible Pakistan by an odds of 10/1 and been quite wrong


Hi Experts,
I could not detect errors efficiently of this question. can you please help me to solve this question>

Thanks
anu
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by fabiocafarelli » Thu Mar 03, 2016 7:47 am
1. Your first line of attack could be to select the beginning most in tune with the idea that the sentence is trying to convey. Thus, either WOULD HAVE CHOSEN or WOULD CHOOSE.

2. A cricketer trying to predict something today probably WOULD CHOOSE an outcome or WOULD SAY something or WOULD EXPECT something.

3. Nevertheless, this sentence is talking about how a hypothetical cricketer was trying in 1996 to predict something: in other words, the action of trying to predict is happening in the past. (The sentence makes this perfectly clear in the ending: the statement that the cricketer was WRONG tells us that the game finished and that the outcome was different from the one predicted.)

4. Consequently, the cricketer probably WOULD HAVE CHOSEN Pakistan. This Perfect Conditional form presents a hypothetical past action. And since this hypothetical action has a consequence, the cricketer WOULD HAVE BEEN wrong. (The given sentence does not repeat WOULD HAVE, because there is no need: those verbs apply equally to CHOSEN and to BEEN.)

5. In option B, the sequence WOULD HAVE CHOSEN ... AND BE is grammatically unsound and illogical. It implies that the cricketer would have chosen an outcome in 1996 and would be wrong in some unspecified future - perhaps in 2017. But cricket games, though long, are not that long.

6. If you missed this problem, you could still have eliminated B on the basis of the IT, which states quite directly that the outcome of the match would have been Pakistan.

(Actually, option A, though the best option and the one you would have to select, is still not very good: it makes little sense to say that somebody trying to predict the outcome would have chosen Pakistan: this is the same error as the one in option B, though there it occurs in a grosser form. What the sentence is trying to say, but does not say very successfully, is that a cricketer trying to predict the outcome would have foretold a victory by Pakistan.)

If you like this post, please click on the THANK icon.

You can also visit us at https://www.xgmat.com/
Join the discussion