If there is a drought that ruins the wheat crop of a large wheat exporting county resulting in higher international wheat prices, domestic wheat prices in free-trading countries such as England will increase as well, regardless of how much wheat, if any, that country imports.
If the statement concerning wheat supply is true, which of the following policies in a free-market nation is most likely to reduce the long-term economic impact on that nation of steep and unexpected increases in international wheat prices?
A) Maintaining a large wheat reserve sufficient to meet demand for several months.
(B) Increasing domestic production of wheat for the following year.
(C) Contracting with new wheat exporting nations.
(D) Increasing the number of wheat imports.
(E) Reducing domestic consumption of wheat by switching to alternative grains where possible.
i think both E and A are good... whats your answer and why did you choose it?
a cr from gmatclub
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
- Thanked: 29 times
- Followed by:3 members
- abhi0697
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:39 pm
- Location: Singapore
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:2 members
IMO E as the arguments states that the domestic wheat price in free-trading country will increase regardless of how much wheat that country imports. This suggests that to reduce the long term economic impact on that nation, switching to alternative grains is the best solution.
- DhruvXVII
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:07 am
- Location: Pune, India
- GMAT Score:680
IMO E
A says 'Maintaining a large wheat reserve sufficient to meet demand for several months.' It is unclear as to how many months we are talking about. Also, what if after several months, when the reserve wheat has been exhausted, the international prices are still high? Then that nation might still have to import wheat. This option fails to address the 'long-term' aspectt of the question.
Regards,
Dhruv
A says 'Maintaining a large wheat reserve sufficient to meet demand for several months.' It is unclear as to how many months we are talking about. Also, what if after several months, when the reserve wheat has been exhausted, the international prices are still high? Then that nation might still have to import wheat. This option fails to address the 'long-term' aspectt of the question.
Regards,
Dhruv
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:57 am
- Thanked: 17 times
- Followed by:1 members
I'm sure OA is E,
This is a very popular question and so many people created the replica (by changing just words) of this concept.
Op A is wrong because:
"reduce the long-term economic impact on that nation of steep and unexpected increases in international wheat prices"
Op A: Maintaining a large wheat reserve sufficient to meet demand for several months.
Several months may or may not be equal to long-term
This is a very popular question and so many people created the replica (by changing just words) of this concept.
Op A is wrong because:
"reduce the long-term economic impact on that nation of steep and unexpected increases in international wheat prices"
Op A: Maintaining a large wheat reserve sufficient to meet demand for several months.
Several months may or may not be equal to long-term
Princeton Review CAT - 710(Q-51, V-37) --> silly mistakes screwed up my VERBAL