a cr from gmat

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

a cr from gmat

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon May 23, 2011 5:53 pm
The U.S. gets 5 percent of its oil from Mexico. If Mexico raises the price of its oil by 20 percent, that will result in an increase of 1 percent (5 percent times 20 percent) in the price of oil products in the U.S.

Which of the following is an assumption upon which the above argument depends?
A) Oil prices in the U.S. are not affected by inflation in Mexico
B) Other countries will not increase oil exports to the U.S.
C) The price increase will not result in a decrease in the sales of Mexican oil products
D) People will not substitute other products for those made from Mexican oil
E) A 1 percent price increase in oil products will not be recognized by the buying public
[spoiler]
iut took me 1 minute and 55 seconds to choose C . i was just between B and C but was deeply thinking that B could be the answer. if the usa would import oil from another countries instead of importing oil from mexico becos of 5% increasing price, the concluion will be failed however considering another countries is far from information mentioned in the text so i didint choose B. whats your idea? whats your answer?[/spoiler]

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:52 am
Thanked: 156 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:720

by vineeshp » Mon May 23, 2011 6:27 pm
If this is from the real test, I suggest you take it off.
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:39 pm
Location: Singapore
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:2 members

by abhi0697 » Tue May 24, 2011 3:35 am
I will go for B since this is clear assumption that US will continue to take oil at the increased rate from Mexico and US will not consider taking from other countries.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:13 members
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Tue May 24, 2011 4:25 am
diebeatsthegmat wrote:The U.S. gets 5 percent of its oil from Mexico. If Mexico raises the price of its oil by 20 percent, that will result in an increase of 1 percent (5 percent times 20 percent) in the price of oil products in the U.S.

Which of the following is an assumption upon which the above argument depends?
A) Oil prices in the U.S. are not affected by inflation in Mexico
B) Other countries will not increase oil exports to the U.S.
C) The price increase will not result in a decrease in the sales of Mexican oil products
D) People will not substitute other products for those made from Mexican oil
E) A 1 percent price increase in oil products will not be recognized by the buying public
[spoiler]
iut took me 1 minute and 55 seconds to choose C . i was just between B and C but was deeply thinking that B could be the answer. if the usa would import oil from another countries instead of importing oil from mexico becos of 5% increasing price, the concluion will be failed however considering another countries is far from information mentioned in the text so i didint choose B. whats your idea? whats your answer?[/spoiler]
C is out of scope and not a contnder as 1)Oil products 2) the word Mexican
We are not importing Mexican oil products and once imported it is our Oil not the mexicans.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 474 times
Followed by:365 members

by VivianKerr » Tue May 24, 2011 7:16 am
IMO: C

Conclusion: IF Mexico raises oil price 20%, THEN 1% increase in price of US oil.

Evidence: US gets 5% of the oil from Mexico.

Assumptions: The US won't switch to different oil source when Mexico raises the price.

Question Rephrase: What is an assumption? (see assumption for prediction)

C is almost verbatim our prediction, and must be the correct answer. The entire argument assumes the US will just continue to buy more expensive oil, and will allow the price to increase by 1%.

B has similar logic but does not relate to the evidence and the conclusion which are focuses on the US-Mexico oil relationship. What "other countries" do does not relate specifically to the conclusion described in the "if...then..." statement.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:09 am
Location: Pune, India
Thanked: 1 times

by abhimanyu.tanwar » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:46 am
I choose B over C as C talks about "oil products" and not "oil".
what is the OA?
Regards
Abhimanyu

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 1:44 am
Thanked: 2 times

by gmat062011 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 8:03 pm
Hi VivianKerr,

As per my understanding, Price increase and sales decrease are 2 different thing. In question, we need to find argument to support price increase. If US can't get additional oil from other countries, then price of oil products will increase, due to increase cost.

Please help me to understand.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 174
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:41 pm
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by sanabk » Fri Jun 24, 2011 6:08 pm

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:39 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by ranjithreddy.k9 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 7:53 pm
My take C...whats the OA?