Stuart Kovinsky wrote:meng wrote:Hi everybody, this is actually a 700 level question !

I hope that you can solve it within 2 min ! if you did .. I can say that your score gonna be around 700
Guests at a recent party ate a total of fifteen hamburgers. Each guest who was neither a student nor a vegetarian ate exactly one hamburger. No hamburger was eaten by any guest who was a student, a vegetarian, or both. If half of the guests were vegetarians, how many guests attended the party?
(1) The vegetarians attended the party at a rate of 2 students to every 3 non-students, half the rate for non-vegetarians.
(2) 30% of the guests were vegetarian non-students.
Hooray for another opportunity to showcase the all-powerful data sufficiency tool, "# of equations vs # of unknowns".
There are only two groups here, so we can use the basic overlapping sets formula:
True # of objects = total # in group 1 + total # in group + total # in neither group - # in both groups
or, more simply:
Total = G1 + G2 + neither - both
Applying that formula to the question stem, we get:
# Guests = #students + #vegetarians + neither - both
and we know that
#v = 1/2(#g) and neither = 15, so:
G = S + .5G + 15 - both
So, we have 1 equation and 3 unknowns.
(1) gives us two ratios. What can we do with ratios? Turn them into equations! Now, here's the beautiful thing... we don't care what those equations are, as long as they:
- are linear;
- are distinct; and
- don't introduce any new variables.
Going through our checklist, we see that all 3 criteria are upheld. Therefore, we have 3 distinct linear equations for 3 unknowns: we can solve the entire system, sufficient!
(2) gives us one equation that still leaves some variables we don't want in the mix: insufficient.
(1) is sufficient, (2) isn't: choose (A).
I know I must be obviously wrong since I'm the only one who's reaching a contradiction with B:
so I solved it the same way as you did (ven diagram and equations) and I got that A is sufficient, however, for B this is what I get..please lemme know where I'm wrong?
so before approaching A or B, we get:
S (students) - S conjunction V + 15 = T/2 (same thing as you got)
now B gives me:
V = 30%T, in other words: non-vegeterians = 70%T.
let's call S- (S conjuction V) : a -just for the sake of simplicity. I understand that they are two independent vars.
so what we had from before:
a + 15 = T/2
and B gives us:
a + 15 (all the non-veg)= 70%T
which leads to a contradiction, since 70%T can't be equal to T/2
Please advice,
Thanks