5 pieces of wood have an average length of 124 inches and a median of 140 inches. What is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood?
90
100
110
130
140
Struggling big time..need DETAILED EXPLANATIONS
5 pieces of wood
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:08 pm
- Location: Kolkata,India
- Thanked: 7 times
- GMAT Score:670
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:08 pm
- Location: Kolkata,India
- Thanked: 7 times
- GMAT Score:670
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
- Thanked: 9 times
- Followed by:3 members
should be b
x1+x2+x3+x4+x5 = 5*124
x1+x2+x3+x4+x5 = 600
to make the smallest piece largest make x4 , x5 = x3 = 140
so we have x1+x2 = 600 - 3*140 = 200
now largest value that x1 can take is 100
x1+x2+x3+x4+x5 = 5*124
x1+x2+x3+x4+x5 = 600
to make the smallest piece largest make x4 , x5 = x3 = 140
so we have x1+x2 = 600 - 3*140 = 200
now largest value that x1 can take is 100
5 x 124 = 620.
now median is 140, that leaves us with 480.
Now the shortest possible length of the two largest piece of woods is 140. i.e. x,y, 140,140,140 would give you largest possible length of smallest wood.
That leaves us with 620-420(=140+140+140) = 200. So x could be 60 and y could be 140. 140 is your answer.
now median is 140, that leaves us with 480.
Now the shortest possible length of the two largest piece of woods is 140. i.e. x,y, 140,140,140 would give you largest possible length of smallest wood.
That leaves us with 620-420(=140+140+140) = 200. So x could be 60 and y could be 140. 140 is your answer.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:41 am
- Thanked: 2 times
B is correct.
124*5 = 620.
Since we're looking for the MAX of the smallest piece, we want the numbers greater than the median to be the smallest they can be: 140.
x + y + 140*3 = 620
x + y = 200
X and Y = 100 if we're trying to find the maximum since any adjustment makes one number smaller.
124*5 = 620.
Since we're looking for the MAX of the smallest piece, we want the numbers greater than the median to be the smallest they can be: 140.
x + y + 140*3 = 620
x + y = 200
X and Y = 100 if we're trying to find the maximum since any adjustment makes one number smaller.
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Based on choosing 60/140, the correct answer to the question would be 60 (remember, we want the largest possible length of the shortest piece of wood).GID09 wrote:5 x 124 = 620.
now median is 140, that leaves us with 480.
Now the shortest possible length of the two largest piece of woods is 140. i.e. x,y, 140,140,140 would give you largest possible length of smallest wood.
That leaves us with 620-420(=140+140+140) = 200. So x could be 60 and y could be 140. 140 is your answer.
You did everything right until this very last step. With our set of:
{x, y, 140, 140, 140}
we see that we have a total of 200 left over for x and y. As Hypermeganet notes, to maximize both of them we simply let x=y and end up with 100/100 as our split.
Accordingly, B is the correct answer.
In general, here are the two rules to remember for these types of questions:
To maximize one number in a set, minimize everything else.
To minimize one number in a set, maximize everything else.
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course