EI Nino, the periodic abnormal warming of the sea surface off Peru, is a phenomenon in which changes in the ocean and atmosphere combine to allow the warm water that is accumulated in the western Pacific to flow back to the east.
This is the right sentence. I believe "in which changes in the ocean and atmosphere combine" is the attribute clause, which modifies "a phenomenon". The simple sentence structure is "EI Nino is a phenomenon to allow the warm water to flow back to the east". Am I correct?
Thanks in advance!
2016 OG SC 109
This topic has expert replies
- nchaswal
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:16 pm
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:740
Dear Crystal
You answer is correct. But the simple sentence is different than what you wrote. It should be:-
Main independent clause : El Nino is a phenomenon.
The dependent clause: in which changes in the ocean and atmosphere combine to allow the warm water that is accumulated in the western Pacific to flow back to the east.
Note that "in which" is introducing another clause which by itself can stand alone but the whole clause including "in which" cannot stand alone. Read the line below :-
Changes in ocean and atmosphere combine to allow the water that is accumulated in the western Pacific to flow back to the east.
Above, "Changes" are the subject doing the action "combine" and the effect of action is taken by "water that is accumulated in the western Pacific". Note that "that is accumulated in the western Pacific" cannot be deleted as the modifier is an essential modifier and without which you will not know WHICH water the sentence is referring to.
Hope this makes it clear.
You answer is correct. But the simple sentence is different than what you wrote. It should be:-
Main independent clause : El Nino is a phenomenon.
The dependent clause: in which changes in the ocean and atmosphere combine to allow the warm water that is accumulated in the western Pacific to flow back to the east.
Note that "in which" is introducing another clause which by itself can stand alone but the whole clause including "in which" cannot stand alone. Read the line below :-
Changes in ocean and atmosphere combine to allow the water that is accumulated in the western Pacific to flow back to the east.
Above, "Changes" are the subject doing the action "combine" and the effect of action is taken by "water that is accumulated in the western Pacific". Note that "that is accumulated in the western Pacific" cannot be deleted as the modifier is an essential modifier and without which you will not know WHICH water the sentence is referring to.
Hope this makes it clear.
It is GMAT. So what?
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
EI Nino, the periodic abnormal warming of the sea surface off Peru, is a phenomenon in which changes in the ocean and atmosphere combine to allow the warm water that is accumulated in the western Pacific to flow back to the east.
Here, the entire clause in blue is an essential modifier serving to describe not El Nino but a phenomenon.
Since this clause is an ESSENTIAL modifier, it cannot be removed without altering the meaning of the sentence.
We can, however, remove the non-essential modifier in red.
The result is the core meaning of the sentence:
El Nino is a phenomenon in which changes in the ocean and atmosphere combine to allow the warm water that is accumulated in the western Pacific to flow back to the east.
Rather, to allow is an ADVERB serving to modify combine, expressing WHY changes in the ocean and atmosphere COMBINE.
Question: WHY do changes in the ocean and atmosphere combine?
Answer: They combine TO ALLOW the warm water that is accumulated in the western Pacific to flow back to the east.
Here, the entire clause in blue is an essential modifier serving to describe not El Nino but a phenomenon.
Since this clause is an ESSENTIAL modifier, it cannot be removed without altering the meaning of the sentence.
We can, however, remove the non-essential modifier in red.
The result is the core meaning of the sentence:
El Nino is a phenomenon in which changes in the ocean and atmosphere combine to allow the warm water that is accumulated in the western Pacific to flow back to the east.
In the OA, to allow does not refer to a phenomenon.The simple sentence structure is "EI Nino is a phenomenon to allow the warm water to flow back to the east". Am I correct?
Rather, to allow is an ADVERB serving to modify combine, expressing WHY changes in the ocean and atmosphere COMBINE.
Question: WHY do changes in the ocean and atmosphere combine?
Answer: They combine TO ALLOW the warm water that is accumulated in the western Pacific to flow back to the east.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3