BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

2016 OG CR 30

Expert replies
by Crystal W » Mon May 23, 2016 2:12 am
People who do regular volunteer work tend to live longer, on average, than people who do not. It has been found that "doing good," a category that certainly includes volunteer work, releases endorphins, the brain's natural opiates, which induce in people a feeling of well-being. Clearly, there is a connection: Regular releases of endorphins must in some way help to extend people's lives.Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence given as support for the hypothesis that endorphins promote longevity?
A People who do regular volunteer work are only somewhat more likely than others to characterize the work they do for a living as "doing good."
B Although extremely high levels of endorphins could be harmful to health, such levels are never reached as a result of the natural release of endorphins.
C There are many people who have done some volunteer work but who do not do such work regularly.
D People tend not to become involved in regular volunteer work unless they are healthy and energetic to begin with.
E Releases of endorphins are responsible for the sense of well-being experienced by many long-distance runners while running.

The OA is D. Can someone explain it?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by OptimusPrep » Tue May 24, 2016 7:26 pm
Crystal W wrote:People who do regular volunteer work tend to live longer, on average, than people who do not. It has been found that "doing good," a category that certainly includes volunteer work, releases endorphins, the brain's natural opiates, which induce in people a feeling of well-being. Clearly, there is a connection: Regular releases of endorphins must in some way help to extend people's lives.Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence given as support for the hypothesis that endorphins promote longevity?
A People who do regular volunteer work are only somewhat more likely than others to characterize the work they do for a living as "doing good."
B Although extremely high levels of endorphins could be harmful to health, such levels are never reached as a result of the natural release of endorphins.
C There are many people who have done some volunteer work but who do not do such work regularly.
D People tend not to become involved in regular volunteer work unless they are healthy and energetic to begin with.
E Releases of endorphins are responsible for the sense of well-being experienced by many long-distance runners while running.

The OA is D. Can someone explain it?
People who do volunteering tend to live longer because they feel happy because of the endorphin release.
Conclusion:Volunteering work extend's people's lives.

We need to weaken this conclusion.

1. What if something else increases the lives?
2. What if the persons are already healthy?
In these cases, we cannot conclude that endorphins released as a result of volunteering increase lives

Of the given option, option D resonates with point 2

Correct Option: D
Join the discussion

by Crystal W » Wed May 25, 2016 11:10 pm
OptimusPrep wrote:
Crystal W wrote:People who do regular volunteer work tend to live longer, on average, than people who do not. It has been found that "doing good," a category that certainly includes volunteer work, releases endorphins, the brain's natural opiates, which induce in people a feeling of well-being. Clearly, there is a connection: Regular releases of endorphins must in some way help to extend people's lives.Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence given as support for the hypothesis that endorphins promote longevity?
A People who do regular volunteer work are only somewhat more likely than others to characterize the work they do for a living as "doing good."
B Although extremely high levels of endorphins could be harmful to health, such levels are never reached as a result of the natural release of endorphins.
C There are many people who have done some volunteer work but who do not do such work regularly.
D People tend not to become involved in regular volunteer work unless they are healthy and energetic to begin with.
E Releases of endorphins are responsible for the sense of well-being experienced by many long-distance runners while running.

The OA is D. Can someone explain it?
People who do volunteering tend to live longer because they feel happy because of the endorphin release.
Conclusion:Volunteering work extend's people's lives.

We need to weaken this conclusion.

1. What if something else increases the lives?
2. What if the persons are already healthy?
In these cases, we cannot conclude that endorphins released as a result of volunteering increase lives

Of the given option, option D resonates with point 2

Correct Option: D
Thank you, but I am a little confused because the question is "undermines the force of the evidence", not the "conclusion". Can you explain more?
Join the discussion

by Poisson » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:27 am
Crystal W wrote:
OptimusPrep wrote:
Crystal W wrote:People who do regular volunteer work tend to live longer, on average, than people who do not. It has been found that "doing good," a category that certainly includes volunteer work, releases endorphins, the brain's natural opiates, which induce in people a feeling of well-being. Clearly, there is a connection: Regular releases of endorphins must in some way help to extend people's lives.Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence given as support for the hypothesis that endorphins promote longevity?
A People who do regular volunteer work are only somewhat more likely than others to characterize the work they do for a living as "doing good."
B Although extremely high levels of endorphins could be harmful to health, such levels are never reached as a result of the natural release of endorphins.
C There are many people who have done some volunteer work but who do not do such work regularly.
D People tend not to become involved in regular volunteer work unless they are healthy and energetic to begin with.
E Releases of endorphins are responsible for the sense of well-being experienced by many long-distance runners while running.

The OA is D. Can someone explain it?
People who do volunteering tend to live longer because they feel happy because of the endorphin release.
Conclusion:Volunteering work extend's people's lives.

We need to weaken this conclusion.

1. What if something else increases the lives?
2. What if the persons are already healthy?
In these cases, we cannot conclude that endorphins released as a result of volunteering increase lives

Of the given option, option D resonates with point 2

Correct Option: D
Thank you, but I am a little confused because the question is "undermines the force of the evidence", not the "conclusion". Can you explain more?
Hello,

I also thought this. Because of the wording of the question, it seemed to be asking to undermine the force of the evidence and not the conclusion. I though this was odd. I interpreted this to mean undermine sentence 2. Between D and E, I picked E. Could someone please help explain the logic in this question? Thanks
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Mon Jul 04, 2016 10:21 am
Poisson wrote:
Crystal W wrote:
OptimusPrep wrote:
Crystal W wrote:People who do regular volunteer work tend to live longer, on average, than people who do not. It has been found that "doing good," a category that certainly includes volunteer work, releases endorphins, the brain's natural opiates, which induce in people a feeling of well-being. Clearly, there is a connection: Regular releases of endorphins must in some way help to extend people's lives.Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence given as support for the hypothesis that endorphins promote longevity?
A People who do regular volunteer work are only somewhat more likely than others to characterize the work they do for a living as "doing good."
B Although extremely high levels of endorphins could be harmful to health, such levels are never reached as a result of the natural release of endorphins.
C There are many people who have done some volunteer work but who do not do such work regularly.
D People tend not to become involved in regular volunteer work unless they are healthy and energetic to begin with.
E Releases of endorphins are responsible for the sense of well-being experienced by many long-distance runners while running.

The OA is D. Can someone explain it?
People who do volunteering tend to live longer because they feel happy because of the endorphin release.
Conclusion:Volunteering work extend's people's lives.

We need to weaken this conclusion.

1. What if something else increases the lives?
2. What if the persons are already healthy?
In these cases, we cannot conclude that endorphins released as a result of volunteering increase lives

Of the given option, option D resonates with point 2

Correct Option: D
Thank you, but I am a little confused because the question is "undermines the force of the evidence", not the "conclusion". Can you explain more?
Hello,

I also thought this. Because of the wording of the question, it seemed to be asking to undermine the force of the evidence and not the conclusion. I though this was odd. I interpreted this to mean undermine sentence 2. Between D and E, I picked E. Could someone please help explain the logic in this question? Thanks
To undermine the force of the evidence is to undermine the logic of how the evidence leads to the conclusion, not to undermine (or refute) the evidence itself. This is typically what we're doing in weaken questions.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by Mo2men » Sun Feb 24, 2019 1:43 am
Crystal W wrote:People who do regular volunteer work tend to live longer, on average, than people who do not. It has been found that "doing good," a category that certainly includes volunteer work, releases endorphins, the brain's natural opiates, which induce in people a feeling of well-being. Clearly, there is a connection: Regular releases of endorphins must in some way help to extend people's lives.Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence given as support for the hypothesis that endorphins promote longevity?
A People who do regular volunteer work are only somewhat more likely than others to characterize the work they do for a living as "doing good."
B Although extremely high levels of endorphins could be harmful to health, such levels are never reached as a result of the natural release of endorphins.
C There are many people who have done some volunteer work but who do not do such work regularly.
D People tend not to become involved in regular volunteer work unless they are healthy and energetic to begin with.
E Releases of endorphins are responsible for the sense of well-being experienced by many long-distance runners while running.

The OA is D. Can someone explain it?
Dear GMATGuru

Premise:
Volunteering........> long life
Volunteering........> Endorphins

The conclusion states causal relationship: Endorphins........> longevity.

I do not understand how the OA weaken the argument? How does it weaken the causal relationship here? Does it offer another alternative cause? or reverse the relation? if the latter, does 'healthy' mean long live make them do volunteering?

Thanks in advance
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Feb 25, 2019 4:13 am
Mo2men wrote:
Crystal W wrote:People who do regular volunteer work tend to live longer, on average, than people who do not. It has been found that "doing good," a category that certainly includes volunteer work, releases endorphins, the brain's natural opiates, which induce in people a feeling of well-being. Clearly, there is a connection: Regular releases of endorphins must in some way help to extend people's lives.Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence given as support for the hypothesis that endorphins promote longevity?
A People who do regular volunteer work are only somewhat more likely than others to characterize the work they do for a living as "doing good."
B Although extremely high levels of endorphins could be harmful to health, such levels are never reached as a result of the natural release of endorphins.
C There are many people who have done some volunteer work but who do not do such work regularly.
D People tend not to become involved in regular volunteer work unless they are healthy and energetic to begin with.
E Releases of endorphins are responsible for the sense of well-being experienced by many long-distance runners while running.

The OA is D. Can someone explain it?
Dear GMATGuru

Premise:
Volunteering........> long life
Volunteering........> Endorphins

The conclusion states causal relationship: Endorphins........> longevity.

I do not understand how the OA weaken the argument? How does it weaken the causal relationship here? Does it offer another alternative cause? or reverse the relation? if the latter, does 'healthy' mean long live make them do volunteering?

Thanks in advance
Why do people who do regular volunteer work live longer?
The argument concludes that ENDORPHINS are the cause.
One way to weaken this conclusion is to suggest an ALTERNATE CAUSE.

D: People tend not to become involved in regular volunteer work unless they are healthy and energetic to begin with.
In other words, people who do regular volunteer work are HEALTHIER AND MORE ENERGETIC than those who don't.
Implication:
The volunteers' longevity is caused NOT by endorphins but by BETTER HEALTH AND GREATER ENERGY, weakening the conclusion that endorphins promote longevity.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion