BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

11. If W +x <0, is w-y>0?

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Legendary Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:59 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: USA
Thanked: 13 times

by niraj_a » Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 am
from the stem, they are asking if w > y

statement II gives you that info directly while statement I does not.

what's the source?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 5:34 pm
Thanked: 7 times

Re: 11. If W +x <0, is w-y>0?

by hwiya320 » Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:19 am
mmgmat2008 wrote:(1) x+y <0
(2) y<x<w
Answer b

I got this wrong. why not D for this question?
Stem is stating,
W + X < 0
W < -X or W > X,
asking, is W>Y?

1) x +y < 0
which means x < -Y or -X > Y
so we knew that -X is greater than W, and now we know that -X is greater than Y. That doesn't prove that W is greater than Y.

I think what you did was X > -Y then flip the sign and got rid of negative for ALL numbers, X < Y... I assume that's how you determined that W>Y>X?

This Q is from GMATPrep.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:46 am

Thanks

by mmgmat2008 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:19 am
This type of questions is my weakness.
Thanks for the answers. I will try to not make the same mistake tomorrow at my G day!:)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pmFollowed by: 11 members
Thanked: 331 times

by cramya » Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:34 pm
Think of it this way.

No info about x,y,w are given (may or may not be integers)

Since w+x<0 is given all we know is either both are negative or one of them is negative and other positive with the abolsute value of the negative number greater than the absolute value of the positive number.

Given w+x<0

w+x<0 i.e w< - x Is w-y>0 or w > y

Stmt II(always try to pick the easier of the 2 statements - just my opinion)

y<x<w

Exactly what we need w>y

SUFF

Now its down to B) or D) .

This way u have increased the probability of answering the question right (50% prob)


Given w+x<0 i.e w < -x (1)

Stmt I

x+y <0 I.E X< - Y (2)

U can pick numbers here where w > y and where w < y satisfying (1) and (2)


INSUFF


Choose B)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:33 am

by chipbmk » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:02 pm
Why can we not do this for statement 1:

Given: W+X<0

Statement 1: X+Y<0

Given --> X+W<0
Statement 1--> X+Y<0
______ (subtract the statements)
= W-Y<0 or W<Y

Doesnt that give you a definitive "no" to the question is w-y>0? or is w>y? appears like it does to me ... let me know
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times

by mehravikas » Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:36 pm
you can never subtract inequalities. you can only add them.

- 1 < 0
-2 < 0
If you add both inequalities you get -3 < 0, which is correct.

If you subtract 2nd statement from 1 i.e.

-1 < 0
-2 < 0
- -
-------

1 < 0 - incorrect
chipbmk wrote:Why can we not do this for statement 1:

Given: W+X<0

Statement 1: X+Y<0

Given --> X+W<0
Statement 1--> X+Y<0
______ (subtract the statements)
= W-Y<0 or W<Y

Doesnt that give you a definitive "no" to the question is w-y>0? or is w>y? appears like it does to me ... let me know
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:02 am

by missrochelle » Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:22 pm
mehravikas wrote:you can never subtract inequalities. you can only add them.

- 1 < 0
-2 < 0
If you add both inequalities you get -3 < 0, which is correct.

If you subtract 2nd statement from 1 i.e.

-1 < 0
-2 < 0
- -
-------

1 < 0 - incorrect
[/quote]


IF YOU ADD THE INEQUALITY IN STATEMENT 1, TO THE STEM THEN HOW DO YOU GET -3 <1?

W + X < 0
X+ Y < 0
W+2X+Y < 0
WHICH DOESN'T ALLOW YOU TO ISOLATE W-Y..... IS THIS INCORRECT?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:37 pm

by andy123 » Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:32 am
W + X < 0
W < -X or W > X,
asking, is W>Y?


Stupid Question but please help :

Is it OK to convert:

W < -X --- >> to ---- >> W > X,

I thought if we multiply by -1 , then we have to multiply both the sides of the equations and reverse the inequality ??

so in thi case: W < -X should not it be converted to -W > X ???
:)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1337
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pmFollowed by: 10 members
Thanked: 127 times

by Night reader » Sun Mar 13, 2011 10:33 am
an interesting problem popped up today. I found answer which is not OA cited in the post, please contribute

... this question's title contains part of this DS, so I am copying/pasting the title of the post back into the post :)
w<-x OR x<-w. Is w>y?
st(1) x<-y --> as x<-w both -w and -y can be greater than y, BUT we don't know if if w>y Not Sufficient;
st(2) y<x<w --> as x<-w and x<w, then we can deduce x<0 and |w|<x . If x<0 then y<0 too. And if y<x then |y|>|x|. If w<0 then w lies to the right from y, i.e. -y<-w. If w>0 then w lies to the left of y again, i.e. y<w. Since we don't know the sign of w, and w can be both +ve and -ve statement(2) is Not Sufficient;
Combined st(1&2): x<-y and y<x<w --> -x>y U x>y suggest y<0 and |x|<y. This is too not sufficient, as both w>y and -w>y present (the same condition was met in statement 2 Alone) BUT we need to meet both conditions w>y AND -w<-y

IOM E
If W +x <0, is w-y>0?
(1) x+y <0
(2) y<x<w
mmgmat2008 wrote:(1) x+y <0
(2) y<x<w
Answer b

I got this wrong. why not D for this question?
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:37 pm

by andy123 » Mon Mar 14, 2011 1:58 am
2nd equation is easy:

Question prompt requires us to prooove: w-y > 0

which means: W > y ??

Option B: already gives the olution y<x<W - thus B.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 47 times
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:57 am
w-y = w+x-x-y = (w+x)-(x+y)


Now let us use A (x+y <0) : (w+x)-(x+y) = -ve - ( -ve) [INSUFFICIENT]... we dont know how much negitive each fellow is
Now let us use B :
Consider w = 1, x = -2, y = -3
then (W+X)-(X+Y) = -1+5
w= 100, x = -101 then y is more negitive

But now
w= -1, x=0 so w+x <0 then x>y so y = -1... no w>y so y = -2...

Hello All ..... B seems fine for me
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1337
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pmFollowed by: 10 members
Thanked: 127 times

by Night reader » Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:35 am
Perhaps I got lost in inequality translations, after plug in and with condition given (w+x<0) I figured |x| could not be more than |w| - so B is Sufficient.
thanks
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:37 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: Varanasi
Thanked: 11 times

by ankur.agrawal » Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:13 am
mmgmat2008 wrote:(1) x+y <0
(2) y<x<w
Answer b

W+x<0 ; W-y>0 or is W>y ?

1) Take w =-2 & x=-3 y=-4 ; These value satisfies W+x<0 & x+y <0

Is W>y. From Values taken it seems Yes it is.

Lets test another set of values : x=1 ; y=-2 ; w=-3

Is W>y . No . A yes & a No . This Statement is not sufficient.

2) Taking the same value for the first case as above:

Take w =-2 & x=-3 y=-4. These values satisfies y<x<w & W+x<0 .

Is w> y . Yes . Lets check another set of values.

w=2 ; x=-3 ; y=-4. again a yes.

If we use this method i think the answer should be D. lets check algebraically for the 2nd Statement.

W+x <0 ; y<x<w

Ist Case : Both Negative : Yes W>y
2nd Case: W + & x - (x has to be more negative than w is positive) = Yes W>y
3rd Case : W- & x+ ( W has to be more negative than x is +)= Yes W>y.

Am i missing sumthing.

I Think B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:37 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: Varanasi
Thanked: 11 times

by ankur.agrawal » Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:15 am
mmgmat2008 wrote:(1) x+y <0
(2) y<x<w
Answer b

W+x<0 ; W-y>0 or is W>y ?

1) Take w =-2 & x=-3 y=-4 ; These value satisfies W+x<0 & x+y <0

Is W>y. From Values taken it seems Yes it is.

Lets test another set of values : x=1 ; y=-2 ; w=-3

Is W>y . No . A yes & a No . This Statement is not sufficient.

2) Taking the same value for the first case as above:

Take w =-2 & x=-3 y=-4. These values satisfies y<x<w & W+x<0 .

Is w> y . Yes . Lets check another set of values.

w=2 ; x=-3 ; y=-4. again a yes.

If we use this method i think the answer should be D. lets check algebraically for the 2nd Statement.

W+x <0 ; y<x<w

Ist Case : Both Negative : Yes W>y
2nd Case: W + & x - (x has to be more negative than w is positive) = Yes W>y
3rd Case : W- & x+ ( W has to be more negative than x is +)= Yes W>y.

Am i missing sumthing.

I Think B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1