Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

1000 CR test 20 Ques 11

Expert replies
by radhika1306 » Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:20 pm
In malaria-infested areas, many children tend to suffer several bouts of malaria before becoming immune to the disease. Clearly, what must be happening is that those children’s immune systems are only weakly stimulated by any single exposure to the malaria parasite and need to be challenged several times to produce an effective immune response.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the explanatory hypothesis?
(A) Immediately after a child has suffered a bout of malaria, the child’s caregivers tend to go to great lengths in taking precautions to prevent another infection, but this level of attention is not sustained.
(B) Malaria is spread from person to person by mosquitoes, and mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the pesticides used to control them.
(C) A certain gene, if inherited by children from only one of their parents, can render those children largely immune to infection with malaria.
(D) Antimalaria vaccines, of which several are in development, are all designed to work by stimulating the body’s immune system.
(E) There are several distinct strains of malaria, and the body’s immune response to any one of them does not protect it against the others
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by chatekar » Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:07 am
I think its E as all others are out of scope in the context of the given information.

Whats the OA?

https://www.theecogeek.wordpress.com
Join the discussion

by radhika1306 » Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:52 am
OA is E.
Can you explain please
Join the discussion

by chatekar » Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:09 am
(A) Immediately after a child has suffered a bout of malaria, the child’s caregivers tend to go to great lengths in taking precautions to prevent another infection, but this level of attention is not sustained.
this talks about attention required after malaria, doesn't help in undermining the given explanation.

(B) Malaria is spread from person to person by mosquitoes, and mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the pesticides used to control them.
the argument talks of immunity towards the parasights and has nothing to do with mosquitoes

(C) A certain gene, if inherited by children from only one of their parents, can render those children largely immune to infection with malaria.
this doesn't explain why immune system doesn't work in case of malaria

(D) Antimalaria vaccines, of which several are in development, are all designed to work by stimulating the body’s immune system.
The explanation talks nothing about the substances outside the human body so this is out of the scope

(E) There are several distinct strains of malaria, and the body’s immune response to any one of them does not protect it against the others
This is perfect as it tells that not all types of malaria are opposed by the immune system of the body
Join the discussion

by fighting_cax » Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:50 pm
But how does choice E account for the fact that "children suffer several bouts of malaria before becoming immune to the disease"? If there are several strains of malaria, and the body's immune response to any one of them does not protect it against the others, then shouldn't the children be continuously infected by malaria?

Please explain.
Join the discussion

by subha_sri8 » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:40 am
Hi,

The conclusion in the argument is " [b]children’s immune systems are only weakly stimulated by any single exposure to the malaria parasite and need to be challenged several times to produce an effective immune response[/b]" meaning for a child to be completely immune to malaria then he must be infected multiple times and the Option E provides a explanation that weakens this conclusion by stating that the multiple occurences of malaria in a child is because the medication taken for one trace will not prevent the other trace of malarial parasite attacking the child
Join the discussion

by Prashant Ranjan » Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:11 pm
(D) in a way is strengthening the argument. It shows that multiple exposures to malarial bouts are indeed responsible for strengthening the immune response of children. The additional info that the choice here provides is the Antimalarial vaccines are now acting as the middle agent for strengthening the immune response necessitating the use of multiple exposures. So (D) instead of weakening, strengthens the argument.

Thanks
Prashant
Join the discussion