BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000 CR test 20 Ques 11

Expert replies
by radhika1306 » Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:20 pm
In malaria-infested areas, many children tend to suffer several bouts of malaria before becoming immune to the disease. Clearly, what must be happening is that those children’s immune systems are only weakly stimulated by any single exposure to the malaria parasite and need to be challenged several times to produce an effective immune response.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the explanatory hypothesis?
(A) Immediately after a child has suffered a bout of malaria, the child’s caregivers tend to go to great lengths in taking precautions to prevent another infection, but this level of attention is not sustained.
(B) Malaria is spread from person to person by mosquitoes, and mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the pesticides used to control them.
(C) A certain gene, if inherited by children from only one of their parents, can render those children largely immune to infection with malaria.
(D) Antimalaria vaccines, of which several are in development, are all designed to work by stimulating the body’s immune system.
(E) There are several distinct strains of malaria, and the body’s immune response to any one of them does not protect it against the others
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by chatekar » Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:07 am
I think its E as all others are out of scope in the context of the given information.

Whats the OA?

https://www.theecogeek.wordpress.com
Join the discussion

by radhika1306 » Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:52 am
OA is E.
Can you explain please
Join the discussion

by chatekar » Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:09 am
(A) Immediately after a child has suffered a bout of malaria, the child’s caregivers tend to go to great lengths in taking precautions to prevent another infection, but this level of attention is not sustained.
this talks about attention required after malaria, doesn't help in undermining the given explanation.

(B) Malaria is spread from person to person by mosquitoes, and mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the pesticides used to control them.
the argument talks of immunity towards the parasights and has nothing to do with mosquitoes

(C) A certain gene, if inherited by children from only one of their parents, can render those children largely immune to infection with malaria.
this doesn't explain why immune system doesn't work in case of malaria

(D) Antimalaria vaccines, of which several are in development, are all designed to work by stimulating the body’s immune system.
The explanation talks nothing about the substances outside the human body so this is out of the scope

(E) There are several distinct strains of malaria, and the body’s immune response to any one of them does not protect it against the others
This is perfect as it tells that not all types of malaria are opposed by the immune system of the body
Join the discussion

by fighting_cax » Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:50 pm
But how does choice E account for the fact that "children suffer several bouts of malaria before becoming immune to the disease"? If there are several strains of malaria, and the body's immune response to any one of them does not protect it against the others, then shouldn't the children be continuously infected by malaria?

Please explain.
Join the discussion

by subha_sri8 » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:40 am
Hi,

The conclusion in the argument is " [b]children’s immune systems are only weakly stimulated by any single exposure to the malaria parasite and need to be challenged several times to produce an effective immune response[/b]" meaning for a child to be completely immune to malaria then he must be infected multiple times and the Option E provides a explanation that weakens this conclusion by stating that the multiple occurences of malaria in a child is because the medication taken for one trace will not prevent the other trace of malarial parasite attacking the child
Join the discussion

by Prashant Ranjan » Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:11 pm
(D) in a way is strengthening the argument. It shows that multiple exposures to malarial bouts are indeed responsible for strengthening the immune response of children. The additional info that the choice here provides is the Antimalarial vaccines are now acting as the middle agent for strengthening the immune response necessitating the use of multiple exposures. So (D) instead of weakening, strengthens the argument.

Thanks
Prashant
Join the discussion