1000 cr 712

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 484
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:01 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

1000 cr 712

by magical cook » Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:45 pm
(E) there might have been an expectation it would rise
712. The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken.
(A) no amount of money or staff members
(B) neither vast amounts of money nor staff members
(C) neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members
(D) neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff
(E) no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money


Hi, The correct answer is D) but why "large staff" is okay? I think it should be "large number of staff"..... so confusing.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 9:23 am
Location: Madison, WI
Thanked: 17 times

by ldoolitt » Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:59 am
Well I'm no expert and I can't totally justify this...

You have a 'neither/nor' construct where the piece after the neither and the nor both have to be parallel. So for what you were saying you would need...

neither vast amounts of money nor a large number of staff members

But I think even that is incorrect. D seems correct.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 9:23 am
Location: Madison, WI
Thanked: 17 times

by ldoolitt » Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:38 pm
Well I'm no expert and I can't totally justify this...

You have a 'neither/nor' construct where the piece after the neither and the nor both have to be parallel. So for what you were saying you would need...

neither vast amounts of money nor a large number of staff members

But I think even that is incorrect. D seems correct.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:33 am
Thanked: 1 times

by agganitk » Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:04 pm
What is wrong with "numbers of .." in option C? It there a grammatical or logical mistake ?

Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:1 members

by paes » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:28 am
agganitk wrote:What is wrong with "numbers of .." in option C? It there a grammatical or logical mistake ?
C absurd meaning :

numbers of staff members can ensure

lets say :

numbers of staff members -> 100

so the sentence is

100 can ensure

what I want to say that
it should be 'large staff' or 'many staff members' as the subject of 'can ensure'.
numbers can't be the subject of 'can ensure'

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:33 am
Thanked: 1 times

by agganitk » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:48 am
On same basis of what you said, I can also not say "Vasts amount can ensure.. "

Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:1 members

by paes » Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:08 am
agganitk wrote:On same basis of what you said, I can also not say "Vasts amount can ensure.. "
vasts amounts of money -> indicating to money

while numbers of students -> indicating to some numerical integer

some expert comment more on this.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:33 am
Thanked: 1 times

by agganitk » Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:27 am
but the money can also be integer such as 10 $ or 20$.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 305
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:38 am
Thanked: 10 times

by Shawshank » Sun Nov 28, 2010 3:44 am
whats wrong with "A" ???
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:17 am
Thanked: 40 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:760

by jaymw » Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:07 pm
What's wrong with A is that it's impossible to have an amount of staff members, because staff members are countable while money isn't.