(E) there might have been an expectation it would rise
712. The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken.
(A) no amount of money or staff members
(B) neither vast amounts of money nor staff members
(C) neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members
(D) neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff
(E) no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money
Hi, The correct answer is D) but why "large staff" is okay? I think it should be "large number of staff"..... so confusing.
1000 cr 712
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:01 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:1 members
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 9:23 am
- Location: Madison, WI
- Thanked: 17 times
Well I'm no expert and I can't totally justify this...
You have a 'neither/nor' construct where the piece after the neither and the nor both have to be parallel. So for what you were saying you would need...
neither vast amounts of money nor a large number of staff members
But I think even that is incorrect. D seems correct.
You have a 'neither/nor' construct where the piece after the neither and the nor both have to be parallel. So for what you were saying you would need...
neither vast amounts of money nor a large number of staff members
But I think even that is incorrect. D seems correct.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 9:23 am
- Location: Madison, WI
- Thanked: 17 times
Well I'm no expert and I can't totally justify this...
You have a 'neither/nor' construct where the piece after the neither and the nor both have to be parallel. So for what you were saying you would need...
neither vast amounts of money nor a large number of staff members
But I think even that is incorrect. D seems correct.
You have a 'neither/nor' construct where the piece after the neither and the nor both have to be parallel. So for what you were saying you would need...
neither vast amounts of money nor a large number of staff members
But I think even that is incorrect. D seems correct.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:1 members
C absurd meaning :agganitk wrote:What is wrong with "numbers of .." in option C? It there a grammatical or logical mistake ?
numbers of staff members can ensure
lets say :
numbers of staff members -> 100
so the sentence is
100 can ensure
what I want to say that
it should be 'large staff' or 'many staff members' as the subject of 'can ensure'.
numbers can't be the subject of 'can ensure'
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:1 members
vasts amounts of money -> indicating to moneyagganitk wrote:On same basis of what you said, I can also not say "Vasts amount can ensure.. "
while numbers of students -> indicating to some numerical integer
some expert comment more on this.