W + X < 0
W < -X or W > X,
asking, is W>Y?
Stupid Question but please help :
Is it OK to convert:
W < -X --- >> to ---- >> W > X,
I thought if we multiply by -1 , then we have to multiply both the sides of the equations and reverse the inequality ??
so in thi case: W < -X should not it be converted to -W > X ???
Silly question about inequalityy ... pls help
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:10 members
that's correct, we should rewrite w<-x as -w>x
Here we are given different conditions w<-x and w>x OR -w>x and w>x. We can further deduct that x<0 and w<|x|. BUT the question is asking about y? Precisely, the question is w>y? Please check with your book again as from this we cannot answer this question, and if this is DS question then the answer is E. If this is not DS question, we need the relationship between x and y ...andy123 wrote: Is it OK to convert:
W < -X --- >> to ---- >> W > X,
I thought if we multiply by -1 , then we have to multiply both the sides of the equations and reverse the inequality ??
so in thi case: W < -X should not it be converted to -W > X ???
andy123 wrote:W + X < 0
W < -X or W > X,
asking, is W>Y?
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:10 members
I have posted solution to this DS question in the relevant forum today. I have also arrived at different answer - E.
andy123 wrote:the question is;
Can I convert W < -X
to -W > X ? - is this correct ?
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com