Ratio + inequality ??

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:55 am
Location: vancouver, B.C
GMAT Score:640

Ratio + inequality ??

by hpgmat » Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:12 am
on a certain sight seeing tour, ratio of number of women to children was 5 to 2. what was the unmber of men on the sight seeing tour?

1) ratio of nmber of children to men was 5 to 11
2) the number of women was less than 30
Will Win
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:13 pm
Location: Canada
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:590

by carllecat » Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:57 am
hpgmat wrote:on a certain sight seeing tour, ratio of number of women to children was 5 to 2. what was the unmber of men on the sight seeing tour?

1) ratio of nmber of children to men was 5 to 11
2) the number of women was less than 30
The ratio Women / Children is 5/2 and we are looking for the number of men on the tour.

1) Men / Chilren is 5 / 11 - This ratio compared with the other ratio does not help to find the total number of men.
2) It would be possible to find the number of men if the number of women was fix and not less or more than... In that case, the less than is hyphothetical and cannot help us to determine how many men were on the tour.

Answer E???

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:43 pm
Thanked: 22 times
GMAT Score:710

by palvarez » Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:58 am
1. C:M = 5:11, and W:C = 5:2
W:C:M = 25:10:22 Insuff
2. W < 30 Insuff

Combined, sufficient: W = 25
M = 22

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:13 pm
Location: Canada
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:590

by carllecat » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:16 pm
palvarez wrote:1. C:M = 5:11, and W:C = 5:2
W:C:M = 25:10:22 Insuff
2. W < 30 Insuff

Combined, sufficient: W = 25
M = 22
Not sure I get the W:C:M part and the combined one too.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:55 am
Location: vancouver, B.C
GMAT Score:640

by hpgmat » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:24 pm
carllecat wrote:
palvarez wrote:1. C:M = 5:11, and W:C = 5:2
W:C:M = 25:10:22 Insuff
2. W < 30 Insuff

Combined, sufficient: W = 25
M = 22
Not sure I get the W:C:M part and the combined one too.
HE HAS MULTIPLIED FIRST RATIO BY 2 AND THE SECOND RATIO BY 5

WE GET C:M EQUAL TO 10:22
AND W:C EQUAL TO 25:10
NOW WE COMBINE BOTH RATIOS ( 10 IS COMMON)
Will Win

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:13 pm
Location: Canada
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:590

by carllecat » Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:52 pm
hpgmat wrote:
carllecat wrote:
palvarez wrote:1. C:M = 5:11, and W:C = 5:2
W:C:M = 25:10:22 Insuff
2. W < 30 Insuff

Combined, sufficient: W = 25
M = 22
Not sure I get the W:C:M part and the combined one too.
HE HAS MULTIPLIED FIRST RATIO BY 2 AND THE SECOND RATIO BY 5

WE GET C:M EQUAL TO 10:22
AND W:C EQUAL TO 25:10
NOW WE COMBINE BOTH RATIOS ( 10 IS COMMON)

Then why is the answer C and not A? Does it really matter that W < 30?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:55 am
Location: vancouver, B.C
GMAT Score:640

by hpgmat » Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:14 pm
carllecat wrote:
hpgmat wrote:
carllecat wrote:
palvarez wrote:1. C:M = 5:11, and W:C = 5:2
W:C:M = 25:10:22 Insuff
2. W < 30 Insuff

Combined, sufficient: W = 25
M = 22
Not sure I get the W:C:M part and the combined one too.
HE HAS MULTIPLIED FIRST RATIO BY 2 AND THE SECOND RATIO BY 5

WE GET C:M EQUAL TO 10:22
AND W:C EQUAL TO 25:10
NOW WE COMBINE BOTH RATIOS ( 10 IS COMMON)

Then why is the answer C and not A? Does it really matter that W < 30?
YES THAT PUTS A CONSTRAINT ON IT IF W > 30 ANND LETS ASSUME IF IT WAS 50 THEN NUMBER OF MEN WOULD BE 44 OR IF IT WAS 100 , THEN NUMBER OF MEN WOULD BE 88. KNOWING W < 30 THERE IS ONLY ONE CONDITION WHICH SATISFIES THE RATIO SINCE WE CAN NOT HAVE FRACTIONS AS NUMBER OF PEOPLE ( ONLY INTEGERS COUNT NUMBER OF PEOPLE)
Will Win