BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Written in ink or engraved by stylus,

Expert replies

by mittalashwani13 » Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:16 am
goelmohit2002 wrote:
mittalashwani13 wrote:
goelmohit2002 wrote:Can someone please tell what does the below highlighted "that" points to in D.

"D. is as vivid in its details of personal life as that gathered "

"That" is referring to the "historical account" ..
Thanks.

Just one small doubt...

Can historical account be gathered....? This looks to be a bit awkward....or it is ok to use this ?
Yes, one can gather historical account. Pls follow the link for the definition of word "account"
https://dictionary.reference.com/browse/account
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Fri Jul 03, 2009 12:08 pm
Thanks.
Join the discussion

Re: Written in ink or engraved by stylus,

by El Cucu » Fri Jul 03, 2009 12:37 pm
ska7945 wrote:Written in ink or engraved by stylus, more than 2,000 letters and documents on wooden tablets excavated at the site of the old roman fort at vindolanda in northern England are yielding a historical account of the military garrison in the first and second centuries that are so vivid in their details about personal life as they are from Pompeii

A. are so vivid in their details about personal life as they ate
B. are as vivid in their details of personal life as those gathered
C. is as vivid in their detail about personal life as that gathered
D. is as vivid in its details of personal life as that gathered
E. is so vivid in its details of personal life as is that
Interesting SC, source pls? Tks
Join the discussion

by Kajiabeat » Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:16 am
Can any instructor explain the "that" in choices?

what does this"that" mean?? what are the both party of the comparison?

Eagerly waiting!

Thank you very much!
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:35 am
Kajiabeat wrote:Can any instructor explain the "that" in choices?

what does this"that" mean?? what are the both party of the comparison?

Eagerly waiting!

Thank you very much!
good question. ick, this problem is ugly.
what's the source? does anybody know the original source of the problem?

i don't see a legitimate antecedent for "that", either. i think the authors are trying to write a sentence in which "that" stands for "historical account", but that doesn't make too much sense -- you can't really have a "historical account gathered" from somewhere. you can have artifacts/scrolls gathered from somewhere, and then a historical account based on those items, but the account itself isn't gathered.

still, it's possible to get down to choice (d) by pure grammar/idiom concerns:
* the subject of the first verb is "historical account", so you can eliminate (a) and (b), which have plural verbs;
* the correct idiom for equating two things in terms of extent is "as ADJ as...", not "so ADJ as...", so kill (e)
* the pronoun must also refer to the historical account, so "their" is wrong in (c)
this leaves (d).

still, an ugly problem. i'd like to know the source.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by Cumulonimbus » Sat Jun 07, 2014 8:09 am
Hi Ron,

Source is GMAT PREP.
lunarpower wrote:
Kajiabeat wrote:Can any instructor explain the "that" in choices?

what does this"that" mean?? what are the both party of the comparison?

Eagerly waiting!

Thank you very much!
good question. ick, this problem is ugly.
what's the source? does anybody know the original source of the problem?

i don't see a legitimate antecedent for "that", either. i think the authors are trying to write a sentence in which "that" stands for "historical account", but that doesn't make too much sense -- you can't really have a "historical account gathered" from somewhere. you can have artifacts/scrolls gathered from somewhere, and then a historical account based on those items, but the account itself isn't gathered.

still, it's possible to get down to choice (d) by pure grammar/idiom concerns:
* the subject of the first verb is "historical account", so you can eliminate (a) and (b), which have plural verbs;
* the correct idiom for equating two things in terms of extent is "as ADJ as...", not "so ADJ as...", so kill (e)
* the pronoun must also refer to the historical account, so "their" is wrong in (c)
this leaves (d).

still, an ugly problem. i'd like to know the source.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sun Jul 14, 2019 6:53 pm
Hi
"As X so Y" is the correct idiom can we use it always as a rule and in this context to eliminate option E.
I did not understand the negative connotation being talked about for usage of "so X as Y" (as in option E), I guess it will always be incorrect.
Kindly, shed some light.
Join the discussion

by vietnam47 » Tue Aug 06, 2019 12:09 am
that clause can refer to a far noun. this case is consider inferior and can be wrong if there is a better choice. but inhere, no better choice appear and the inferior case is correct.

this is simple thinking of inferior pattern but is important and give us confidence when we face inferior pattern.
Join the discussion