in addition to being more expensive than manual research,machine-based research often identifies compounds that are of lower quality than those identified by manual research, which are more likely to become marketable pharmaceutical products.
Q-i am confused whether "which" modifies manual research or compounds?
"which" modifier. please help...
This topic has expert replies
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 5:27 am
- MelissaLim
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:07 pm
- Followed by:2 members
Manojks,
The relative pronoun WHICH refers to the noun directly before it and not to the entire clause. In the question you posted, since manual research comes directly before WHICH, WHICH modifies manual research.
Hope this helps.
The relative pronoun WHICH refers to the noun directly before it and not to the entire clause. In the question you posted, since manual research comes directly before WHICH, WHICH modifies manual research.
Hope this helps.
if "which" modifies manual research then "which are more likely to become marketable pharmaceutical products" is wrong because "marketable pharmeceutical products" refers to compounds. please clarify.
MelissaLim wrote:Manojks,
The relative pronoun WHICH refers to the noun directly before it and not to the entire clause. In the question you posted, since manual research comes directly before WHICH, WHICH modifies manual research.
Hope this helps.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:07 am
- Thanked: 19 times
- Followed by:3 members
compounds (that are....),which are...;
Here "compounds" is modified by essential 'that' clause and then by a non essential 'which' clause;
also 'which are' can't refer to manual research; It looks fine to me but I am not an expert.
Here "compounds" is modified by essential 'that' clause and then by a non essential 'which' clause;
also 'which are' can't refer to manual research; It looks fine to me but I am not an expert.
manojks wrote:in addition to being more expensive than manual research,machine-based research often identifies compounds that are of lower quality than those identified by manual research, which are more likely to become marketable pharmaceutical products.
Q-i am confused whether "which" modifies manual research or compounds?
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 2:32 am
- Thanked: 6 times
in addition to being more expensive than manual research,machine-based research often identifies compounds that are of lower quality than those identified by manual research, which are more likely to become marketable pharmaceutical products.
If "which" is modifying compounds, the intention of the sentence becomes "Compounds that are of lower quality are more likely to become marketable pharmaceutical products". "Which" is a relative pronoun and can be replaced by the noun it refers to, if it really refers to "compounds" in this case.
As per the rule, "which" modifies the immediate preceding noun, and in this case should modify Manual Research logically. Continuation of the sentence might not be true or needs to be constructed in another manner. If the "which" exists then the continuation should logically belong to Manual Research or if the other part "are more likely to become marketable pharmaceutical products" should be true, then the sentence should be something like
in addition to being more expensive than manual research,machine-based research often identifies lower quality compounds,which are more likely to become marketable pharmaceutical products, than those identified by manual research . - this looks clear and crisp.
Please provide the original sentence for more analysis.
Feel free to critique.
Thanks,
HK
If "which" is modifying compounds, the intention of the sentence becomes "Compounds that are of lower quality are more likely to become marketable pharmaceutical products". "Which" is a relative pronoun and can be replaced by the noun it refers to, if it really refers to "compounds" in this case.
As per the rule, "which" modifies the immediate preceding noun, and in this case should modify Manual Research logically. Continuation of the sentence might not be true or needs to be constructed in another manner. If the "which" exists then the continuation should logically belong to Manual Research or if the other part "are more likely to become marketable pharmaceutical products" should be true, then the sentence should be something like
in addition to being more expensive than manual research,machine-based research often identifies lower quality compounds,which are more likely to become marketable pharmaceutical products, than those identified by manual research . - this looks clear and crisp.
Please provide the original sentence for more analysis.
Feel free to critique.
Thanks,
HK
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:07 am
- Thanked: 19 times
- Followed by:3 members
xtremecoder007,
You have raised valid point regarding the meaning of the sentence if which clause is modifying compounds directly. However, I am not convinced that which should modify market-research.
After reading the sentence, I think which clause is modifying those[(compounds) identified my manual reasearch];
i.e. those compounds that are identified by manual research;
You have raised valid point regarding the meaning of the sentence if which clause is modifying compounds directly. However, I am not convinced that which should modify market-research.
After reading the sentence, I think which clause is modifying those[(compounds) identified my manual reasearch];
i.e. those compounds that are identified by manual research;
- Jen@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 12:40 pm
- Location: New York City
- Thanked: 40 times
- Followed by:30 members
This is a tricky one! Let's think about the logic of the sentence. We're comparing two sets of compounds: the compounds identified by machine-based research (lower quality) and the compounds identified by manual research (more likely to become marketable pharmaceutical products). In the sentence, the second set of compounds (manual research) is referred to by the plural pronoun "those." Since it's THOSE compounds that are more likely to become marketable, it's THOSE compounds that the adjective clause is logically describing, so you're absolutely right, GMATVerbal, that the adjective clause is modifying the pronoun "those."
Now, what about the structure? Remember that a relative pronoun must be as close as possible to the noun OR NOUN IDEA it modifies. A noun idea is a noun and modifier that exist as a unit and cannot be interrupted. In this case, we have the noun idea "those identified by manual research." A relative pronoun immediately following this noun idea could modify EITHER the noun right before it, "research," OR the subject noun of the idea, "those." We need to use logic and agreement to determine the appropriate modification. Here's a similar example:
The cluster of islands, which are constantly at war with one another, is in the Pacific Ocean.
The cluster of islands, which is larger than any other cluster, is in the Pacific Ocean.
Both of these sentences are correct -- the noun idea is "cluster of islands."
Hope that helps!
Now, what about the structure? Remember that a relative pronoun must be as close as possible to the noun OR NOUN IDEA it modifies. A noun idea is a noun and modifier that exist as a unit and cannot be interrupted. In this case, we have the noun idea "those identified by manual research." A relative pronoun immediately following this noun idea could modify EITHER the noun right before it, "research," OR the subject noun of the idea, "those." We need to use logic and agreement to determine the appropriate modification. Here's a similar example:
The cluster of islands, which are constantly at war with one another, is in the Pacific Ocean.
The cluster of islands, which is larger than any other cluster, is in the Pacific Ocean.
Both of these sentences are correct -- the noun idea is "cluster of islands."
Hope that helps!