Jessica Mitford wrote The American Way of Death, a best-selling book, that led eventually to an official investigation of the funeral industry.
A. that led eventually
B. that had led eventually
C. that eventually led
D. which led eventually
E. who eventually led
___________________________________
This is one of the most confusing parts of sentence correction. When can you use the word "that" versus which, to, for, who or a bunch of other words?
I think the answer is D. I haven't looked at the solution yet. The reason I picked D is the sentence just flowed better. I'm still studying the rules, but just thought I would ask on this forum.
Thanks in advanced!!
Target Test Prep is 20% off right now!
Use code FLASH20
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
When is it safe to use the word "that?"
This topic has expert replies
-
Tame the CAT
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:27 am
-
rajesh_ctm
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:21 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
No idea which one is correct grammatically. Going just by the ears, C "sounds" most appropriate (familiar).
Please let us know the OA.
Please let us know the OA.
-
Tame the CAT
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:27 am
D is correct. C sounds good as well.
I got lucky. I want to know why the answer is D. I took an online sentence correction quiz which only gives the answers, but not the reasons behind them.
I got lucky. I want to know why the answer is D. I took an online sentence correction quiz which only gives the answers, but not the reasons behind them.
-
jayhawk2001
- Community Manager
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:51 pm
- Location: Silicon valley, California
- Thanked: 30 times
- Followed by:1 members
Here's what I recall reading on "that" vs "which" --
"Which" is used in non-restrictive clauses (one that can be removed
without altering the meaning of the sentence).
"That" is used in restrictive clauses (where the meaning of the sentence
depends on the clause).
In the question, it appears that the official investigation is an integral
part of the sentence and hence should be introduced with a "that". This
leaves us with A or C. "eventually led" seems like a better construction compared to "led eventually".
So, C looks like a better option. Only snag is that there's a comma
before "that" which is usually not the case.
If the OA is D, I'll be interested in hearing why the last clause is
non-restrictive.
"Which" is used in non-restrictive clauses (one that can be removed
without altering the meaning of the sentence).
"That" is used in restrictive clauses (where the meaning of the sentence
depends on the clause).
In the question, it appears that the official investigation is an integral
part of the sentence and hence should be introduced with a "that". This
leaves us with A or C. "eventually led" seems like a better construction compared to "led eventually".
So, C looks like a better option. Only snag is that there's a comma
before "that" which is usually not the case.
If the OA is D, I'll be interested in hearing why the last clause is
non-restrictive.
-
ashok_uddaraju
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:53 pm
here what led was the book so while referring to the book the apt option should be "which led" option D
-
amitamit2020
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:35 am
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
beatthegmat
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6774
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:30 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Thanked: 1249 times
- Followed by:994 members
It's my understanding that clauses beginning with "that" are restrictive and should not be separated by a comma: https://www.ucalgary.ca/UofC/eduweb/gram ... n/3_4c.htmamitamit2020 wrote:Any expert comments if the clause is restrictive or non-restrictive ..pl?
Beat The GMAT | The MBA Social Network
Community Management Team
Research Top GMAT Prep Courses:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-courses
Research The World's Top MBA Programs:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/school
Community Management Team
Research Top GMAT Prep Courses:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-courses
Research The World's Top MBA Programs:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/school
-
800guy
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:20 pm
- Thanked: 11 times
- Followed by:5 members
thats how i understand it toobeatthegmat wrote:It's my understanding that clauses beginning with "that" are restrictive and should not be separated by a comma: https://www.ucalgary.ca/UofC/eduweb/gram ... n/3_4c.htmamitamit2020 wrote:Any expert comments if the clause is restrictive or non-restrictive ..pl?
-
jayhawk2001
- Community Manager
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:51 pm
- Location: Silicon valley, California
- Thanked: 30 times
- Followed by:1 members
Hmm, getting rid of "a best-selling book" clause, we have
Jessica Mitford wrote The American Way of Death that led eventually to an official investigation of the funeral industry.
The commas as I see it pertain to the non-restrictive clause
"a best-selling book", which makes the part introduced by "that"
a restrictive clause.
I'm just plainly confused :-)
Jessica Mitford wrote The American Way of Death that led eventually to an official investigation of the funeral industry.
The commas as I see it pertain to the non-restrictive clause
"a best-selling book", which makes the part introduced by "that"
a restrictive clause.
I'm just plainly confused :-)
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Stacey Koprince
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2228
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
- Location: Montreal, Canada
- Thanked: 639 times
- Followed by:694 members
- GMAT Score:780
The additional info about the investigation is just that - extra info. The basic sentence is "she wrote a book" and we can understand that without the extra info of what happened after the book was written. Since the additional info isn't essential to the basic meaning of the core subject-verb-object, we use "which" instead of "that."
Think of it this way.
You're driving down my street looking for my house and I tell you:
- I'm in the third house, which is red.
- I'm in the third house that is red.
The first sentence tells you to look for the third house, which also just happens to be red. You can still understand the core subject-verb-object (I'm in the third house) without that last bit (even though you would lose some meaning - that the house is red - if you chopped it out).
The second sentence tells you to look for the third red house, which may or may not be the third house overall. If the second sentence is true, I need to use the word "that" or you won't properly understand the core subject-verb-object (I'm in the third house) b/c I'm not just in the third house, I'm in the third red house.
(Of course, I haven't told you what side of the street I'm on, but we'll ignore that for now.
)
If the sentence above really wanted to use "that" to make an essential modifier, it would basically be saying that there is more than one book by this title and so the sentence has to specify that she wrote the one that led to an official investigation etc. And that doesn't make sense.
Think of it this way.
You're driving down my street looking for my house and I tell you:
- I'm in the third house, which is red.
- I'm in the third house that is red.
The first sentence tells you to look for the third house, which also just happens to be red. You can still understand the core subject-verb-object (I'm in the third house) without that last bit (even though you would lose some meaning - that the house is red - if you chopped it out).
The second sentence tells you to look for the third red house, which may or may not be the third house overall. If the second sentence is true, I need to use the word "that" or you won't properly understand the core subject-verb-object (I'm in the third house) b/c I'm not just in the third house, I'm in the third red house.
(Of course, I haven't told you what side of the street I'm on, but we'll ignore that for now.
)If the sentence above really wanted to use "that" to make an essential modifier, it would basically be saying that there is more than one book by this title and so the sentence has to specify that she wrote the one that led to an official investigation etc. And that doesn't make sense.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT
Contributor to Beat The GMAT!
Learn more about me
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT
Contributor to Beat The GMAT!
Learn more about me
-
Cybermusings
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:29 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:2 members
If the above classification between which and that is true, then why is the following sentence considered correct:
Elephants emit low-frequency sounds, believed to originate from a small area on their foreheads, that they may use as a secret language to communicate with other members of the herd.
Elephants emit low-frequency sounds, believed to originate from a small area on their foreheads, that they may use as a secret language to communicate with other members of the herd.
