What are the actual ranges for Q/V scaled scores?

Post your questions about customer service issues, GMAT exam policies, and GMAT exam structure. Get an official answer from GMAC, the organization behind the GMAT test!
This topic has expert replies

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:58 am
Location: New York City
Thanked: 188 times
Followed by:120 members
GMAT Score:770

by Tommy Wallach » Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:54 pm
Ron, only the great Oz is allowed to score above 51. Everyone knows that.

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 613
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:17 am
Location: madrid
Thanked: 171 times
Followed by:64 members
GMAT Score:790

by kevincanspain » Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:15 am
I think that Rebecca means that a quantitative verbal combination above 50,44 places a test-taker well within the 99th percentile. I was under the impression that the highest possible section score is currently 51, though higher section scores were possible long ago.

I have always found it interesting that 6 verbal section scores correspond to the 99th percentile, but that a 99th percentile quantitative score no longer not exists. That's probably how you should think about section scores above 51: currently, they are not awarded, even if a test-taker answers every question correctly.
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:05 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 26 times
Followed by:8 members
GMAT Score:730

by vomhorizon » Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:24 am
I do not think it would be possible to get anything above 51 if the max. you can get in GMAT PREP (By answering all the questions correctly) is a 51. If a score above 51 were possible then either the computer algorithm is different on the real test as compared to GMAT PREP or a score of 51+ is dependent on the type of questions thrown to you, and since those are not in control of the test taker the only difference between a person who get all the questions right and scores a 51 and another who scores a 51+ with all the questions correct would be mere chance (where the computer threw out slightly tougher questions to the second test taker) which seems hard to believe...
I think that Rebecca means that a quantitative verbal combination above 50,44 places a test-taker well within the 99th percentile.
Much lower individual score (In q for example) can propel you towards a 99th percentile range... Given that a 760 means 99th percentile here are some ways to achieve it :

- Q43 , V51
- Q48 , V46
- Q45 , V48

You can find a compilation of various overall scores here :

https://gmathints.com/gmat-info/gmatscores
"When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe, then you'll be successful." - Eric Thomas

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 613
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:17 am
Location: madrid
Thanked: 171 times
Followed by:64 members
GMAT Score:790

by kevincanspain » Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:20 am
What I understood is that a combination Q V above 50 44 will place a test-taker well within the 99th percentile (GMAT 760+) (such a combination is a sufficient condition for a 760+ GMAT score). Other combinations will do as well, as you correctly noted.
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:05 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 26 times
Followed by:8 members
GMAT Score:730

by vomhorizon » Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:00 am
What is interesting is that the Q Percentile keeps on getting better (More people scoring the highest possible 51.) and the Verbal percentile reaches a 90th percentile at just 40. Is it because more international participation in the GMAT or just due to the fact that many people are spending more time proportionally in quant when compared to the verbal ?
"When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe, then you'll be successful." - Eric Thomas

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 234
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 8:50 am
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:60 members

by arun@crackverbal » Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:01 am
Hi Ron,

I asked this question last week to Dr.Rudner during the GMAC Testprep Summit in India.

The answer was this is a legacy issue i.e. having a scale upto 60. The initial plan was to use the scale for future testing purpose. However the current scale gives a fairly accurate measure of performance they will not be using it in the future.

The lower end of the scale was inadvertently mentioned as 11 in his own blog. So the range will continue to be between 6 and 51.

Arun
Founder of CrackVerbal - India's fastest growing GMAT Prepration and MBA Admissions Consulting Company. https://gmat.crackverbal.com

Free Ebook on GMAT | GMAT Scoring, Study plan, top study mistakes etc
Download here: https://gmat.crackverbal.com/15-minute-gmat-guide

Good enough to get into Harvard? Or would be it ISB? Get a free profile report PDF mailed to you: https://applications.crackverbal.com/fre ... valuation/

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:27 am
arun@crackverbal wrote:the current scale gives a fairly accurate measure of performance they will not be using it in the future.
[...]
So the range will continue to be between 6 and 51.

Arun
see, now, that, THAT is what i've been looking for this whole time. jeez louise.

thanks!
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron