1000 SC - 255

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:01 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members

1000 SC - 255

by jangojess » Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:32 pm
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign substance.

(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at

OA - E
[spoiler]Do we need an adverb or an adj in this context???[/spoiler]
Trying hard!!!

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:27 pm

Re: 1000 SC - 255

by dingo001 » Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:54 pm
jangojess wrote:Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign substance.

(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at

OA - E
[spoiler]Do we need an adverb or an adj in this context???[/spoiler]
It seemed like E to me. What is the source?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:01 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members

Ans....

by jangojess » Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:57 pm
it is from the 1000 SC doc...ding, can u tell me why adj is preferred??
Trying hard!!!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 140
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:51 am
Location: India
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:3 members

Re: 1000 SC - 255

by farooq » Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:58 am
In addition to
you need to have an adverb to describe 'unlimited': seemingly - kill A, B, C
the correct idiom is "targeted..at"
Regards,
Farooq Farooqui.
London. UK

It is your Attitude, not your Aptitude, that determines your Altitude.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:04 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:620

by bmlaud » Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:33 am
E

seemingly -adv
unlimited - adj.
number - noun
"Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:47 pm
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign substance.

Adjectives modify nouns and pronouns. Adverbs modify adjectives, verbs, and other adverbs. The adverb seemingly, not the adjective seeming, should be used to modify the adjective unlimited. The idiomatic form to be used here is targeted . .. at rather than targeted ... to. Logic requires that each antibody is meant to deal individually with an invading microbe or foreign substance.

A The adjective seeming should instead be the adverb seemingly.

B The adjective seeming should instead be the adverb seemingly.

C The adjective seeming should instead be the adverb seemingly; the use of all instead of each does not make sense.

D The use of all instead of each does not make sense.

E Correct. This sentence correctly uses seemingly instead of seeming and each instead of all.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 221
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:24 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by mgmt_gmat » Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:21 am
IMO (E).. seemingly is adverb .. should be used.. targeted at .. is correct idiom here.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:02 am

by AManukyan » Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:35 am
komal wrote:Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign substance.

Adjectives modify nouns and pronouns. Adverbs modify adjectives, verbs, and other adverbs. The adverb seemingly, not the adjective seeming, should be used to modify the adjective unlimited. The idiomatic form to be used here is targeted . .. at rather than targeted ... to. Logic requires that each antibody is meant to deal individually with an invading microbe or foreign substance.

A The adjective seeming should instead be the adverb seemingly.

B The adjective seeming should instead be the adverb seemingly.

C The adjective seeming should instead be the adverb seemingly; the use of all instead of each does not make sense.

D The use of all instead of each does not make sense.

E Correct. This sentence correctly uses seemingly instead of seeming and each instead of all.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 6:42 am
Location: New delhi
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:7 members
GMAT Score:590

by varun289 » Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:03 am
main subject is Dr To/// discovery

so what he discovered ? and got price ?


body behaviour to anti bodies - unlimited number of antibodies

we need to modify this "unlimited number of antibodies" with adverb and

here

point to note is ALL VS EACH

so discory tells us that Dr talk about INDIVIDUAL so EACH , Option C gone

2/3 splits - AT Vs To - target At so option B/D gone

now left with E / A

IMO - E