GMAT PREP DS

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:27 am
Location: New York

GMAT PREP DS

by sykedaddy » Fri Jul 06, 2007 4:01 pm
In the xy- plane, does the line with equation y=3x + 2 contain point (r,s)?

(1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0
(2) (4r-6-s) (3r+2-s)=0

I say that they equal each other....but get stuck going down that road...no variables...
No WAMMYs!!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 277
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by givemeanid » Fri Jul 06, 2007 4:16 pm
Does y=3x + 2 contain point (r,s)?
In other words, is s = 3r + 2.
Rearranging the equations, the question is whether 3r + 2 - s = 0?

(1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s) = 0
So, either 3r+2-s = 0 or 4r+9-s = 0
NOT SUFFICIENT.

(2) (4r-6-s) (3r+2-s) = 0
So, either 4r-6-s = 0 or 3r+2-s = 0
NOT SUFFICIENT.

Combining both, 3r+2-s = 0.
SUFFICIENT.


Answer is (C).
So It Goes

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 8:26 am

by eby_98 » Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:46 pm
Is (c) the correct answer?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 986
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:07 am
Location: India
Thanked: 51 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: GMAT PREP DS

by gabriel » Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:25 am
sykedaddy wrote:In the xy- plane, does the line with equation y=3x + 2 contain point (r,s)?

(1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0
(2) (4r-6-s) (3r+2-s)=0

I say that they equal each other....but get stuck going down that road...no variables...
DS questions go in the DS section :( ...

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:27 am
Location: New York

by sykedaddy » Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:18 am
Sorry...yes ans. is C
No WAMMYs!!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:04 pm

by bingojohn » Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:06 am
givemeanid wrote:Does y=3x + 2 contain point (r,s)?
In other words, is s = 3r + 2.
Rearranging the equations, the question is whether 3r + 2 - s = 0?

(1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s) = 0
So, either 3r+2-s = 0 or 4r+9-s = 0
NOT SUFFICIENT.

(2) (4r-6-s) (3r+2-s) = 0
So, either 4r-6-s = 0 or 3r+2-s = 0
NOT SUFFICIENT.

Combining both, 3r+2-s = 0.
SUFFICIENT.


Answer is (C).
What does the emphasized text above mean. In other words how do you combine the two equations to arrive at 3r + 2 - s = 0, definitively? Please explain.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 277
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by givemeanid » Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:18 am
3r+2-s = 0 is the only condition that is satisfied by BOTH 1 and 2.
So It Goes

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1052
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:30 am
Thanked: 335 times
Followed by:98 members

by Patrick_GMATFix » Fri May 21, 2010 10:45 am
The explanation below is pasted from a different thread

the Q tests your understanding that point (r,s) can belong to the line only if its coordinates fit the equation of the line. In other words we can rephrase this from "is (r,s) on line y=3x+2?" to "Is s=3r+2?"

This Q tests your understanding that the solution of a factored equation that is set to 0 is whatever values will make each factor 0. For instance, statemetn (1) tells us that (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s) = 0. This means that
a. 3r+2-s = 0 --> s=3r+2, or
b. 4r+9-s=0 --> s=4r+9

Since we don't know which is correct, we cannot answer the rephrase. Statement (2) will work the same way. Only when you merge the statements can you definitively know that s=3r+2. The correct answer is C

You can see a video of this solution for a step by step demo; this is QID 1088

-Patrick