If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1?
(1) x^n<x<x^(1/n)
(2)x^(n−1)>x^(2n−2)
Source: Manhattan
If n is a prime number.........Manhattan question
This topic has expert replies
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
1/x > 1 only if x is a POSITIVE FRACTION BETWEEN 0 AND 1.Mo2men wrote:If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1?
(1) x^n<x<x^(1/n)
(2)x^(n−1)>x^(2n−2)
Question stem, rephrased:
Is x a positive fraction between 0 and 1?
A prime number greater than 2 must be ODD.
Any odd exponent greater than 1 will have the same effect on the two statements.
Thus, the two statements can be rephrased with n=3, as follows:
x³ < x < x^(1/3)
x² > x�.
Statement 1: x³ < x < x^(1/3)
Case 1: x=-8
Here, x³=-512 and x^(1/3) = -2, with the result that the inequality in red becomes:
-512 < -8 < -2.
Case 2: x=1/8
Here, x³=1/512 and x^(1/3) = 2, with the result that the inequality in red becomes:
1/512 < 1/8 <1/2.
Since the answer to the question stem is NO in Case 1 but YES in Case 2, INSUFFICIENT.
Statement 2: x² > x�
Since the inequality in blue implies that x is NONZERO, x² > 0.
Thus, we can safely divide each side by x²:
x²/x² > x�/x²
1 > x²
x² < 1.
Here, it's possible that x is a positive fraction between 0 and 1 (in which case the answer to the question stem is YES) or a negative fraction between -1 and 0 (in which case the answer to the question stem is NO).
INSUFFICIENT.
Statements combined:
Of the two ranges for x that satisfy Statement 2 -- 0<x<1 and -1<x<0 -- only the first will satisfy Statement 1.
Thus, for both statements to be satisfied, x must be a positive fraction between 0 and 1, implying that the answer to the question stem is YES.
SUFFICIENT.
The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Piggybacking a bit, the second statement can be written this way:
x� � ¹ > (x� � ¹)²
We know that n is an odd prime, or n = 2m + 1, where m is some positive integer whose value we don't care about. Substituting, we have
x²��¹ � ¹ > (x²��¹ � ¹)²
or
x²� > (x²�)²
or
x²� > x��
Since x ≠0 (or else the inequality above is impossible), we can safely divide both sides by x²�, which must be positive (it's a nonzero square), to get 1 > x²�, or 1 > x > -1 with x ≠ 0.
x� � ¹ > (x� � ¹)²
We know that n is an odd prime, or n = 2m + 1, where m is some positive integer whose value we don't care about. Substituting, we have
x²��¹ � ¹ > (x²��¹ � ¹)²
or
x²� > (x²�)²
or
x²� > x��
Since x ≠0 (or else the inequality above is impossible), we can safely divide both sides by x²�, which must be positive (it's a nonzero square), to get 1 > x²�, or 1 > x > -1 with x ≠ 0.