BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Prime number

Expert replies
by chidcguy » Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:52 am
If N is a prime number greater than 3, what is the remainder when N is divided by 12?

(A) 0

(B) 1

(C) 2

(D) 3

(E) 5
Please do not post answer along with the Question you post/ask

Let people discuss the Questions with out seeing answers.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Carol » Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:55 am
when a smaller integer is divided by a larger integer, the quotient is 0

so, I picked 5 as a prime number bigger than 3 and

using the following formula:

n = xq + r

plugging the numbers into it:

5=12 x 0 + r ---> remainder 5


am I correct?
Last edited by Carol on Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by chidcguy » Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:03 pm
How about If Pick 7 and some one else picks 11 or 13
Please do not post answer along with the Question you post/ask

Let people discuss the Questions with out seeing answers.
Join the discussion

by egybs » Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:13 pm
where's this question from?

As stated, I don't think it makes sense.
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:14 pm
Clearly both 1 and 5 are possible remainders, as are 7 and 11. There's something wrong with the question. What's the source?
Join the discussion

by Carol » Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:29 pm
but the possible answers are: 0, 1,2,3,5.

so I picked 5 because they asked you for a prime number greater than 3, hence 5, right?


what's the OA ?
Join the discussion

by chidcguy » Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:50 pm
This is from a GMAT paper test. Answer is B. Did not make any sense to me and thats why I posted here to see if I was trapped.
Please do not post answer along with the Question you post/ask

Let people discuss the Questions with out seeing answers.
Join the discussion

by Carol » Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:21 pm
I would have faild as well...

according to the OA, I think:

the numerator must be greater than the dominator, for the quotient won't be zero!

again the formula:

n = xq + r

I chose 13 as the prime number greater than 3

and

13 = 12 x 1 + 1

I think this sounds correct this time. I think the question missed smth, they should have given us more data.

What do you think?
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:39 pm
Carol wrote: the numerator must be greater than the dominator, for the quotient won't be zero!
There's nothing wrong with having a quotient of zero in this question. All we know is that N is greater than 3. Unless some information is missing from the question itself, or something has been mistranscribed, there isn't enough information here to give a unique answer- there are four possible answers (1, 5, 7, 11). If you replace the number '12' in the question with a '2', however, then the answer would be B, since you'd know N was odd. That's the only quick adjustment I can think to make to the question if we want the question to make any sense.
Join the discussion

by mttorii » Thu Jun 26, 2008 4:20 pm
Carol,

Using your formula, It also works with 17 (prime number)
17 = 12 x 1 + 5 ... and therefore we have a different reminder.

Furthermore
25 = 12 x 2 + 1

So B should not be the answer because 25 is not a prime number.
Anyway this question sounds strange.
Join the discussion